• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估肺癌筛查项目网站上可供卫生专业人员和潜在参与者获取的信息:横断面研究。

Assessing Information Available for Health Professionals and Potential Participants on Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites: Cross-sectional Study.

作者信息

Dodd Rachael H, Zhang Chenyue, Sharman Ashleigh R, Carlton Julie, Tang Ruijin, Rankin Nicole M

机构信息

School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Cancer. 2022 Aug 30;8(3):e34264. doi: 10.2196/34264.

DOI:10.2196/34264
PMID:36040773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9472061/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) updated recommendations for lung cancer screening in 2021, adjusting the age of screening to 50 years (from 55 years) and reducing the number of pack-years used to estimate total firsthand cigarette smoke exposure to 20 (from 30). With many individuals using the internet to find health care information, it is important to understand what information is available for individuals contemplating lung cancer screening.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the eligibility criteria and information available on lung cancer screening program websites for both health professionals and potential screening participants.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional analysis of 151 lung cancer screening program websites of academic (n=76) and community medical centers (n=75) in the United States with information for health professionals and potential screening participants was conducted in March 2021. Presentation of eligibility criteria for potential screening participants and presence of information available specific to health professionals about lung cancer screening were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included presentation of information about cost and smoking cessation, inclusion of an online risk assessment tool, mention of any clinical guidelines, and use of multimedia to present information.

RESULTS

Eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening was included in nearly all 151 websites (n=142, 94%), as well as age range (n=139, 92.1%) and smoking history (n=141, 93.4%). Age was only consistent with the latest recommendations in 14.5% (n=22) of websites, and no websites had updated smoking history. Half the websites (n=76, 50.3%) mentioned screening costs as related to the type of insurance held. A total of 23 (15.2%) websites featured an online assessment tool to determine eligibility. The same proportion (n=23, 15.2%) hosted information specifically for health professionals. In total, 44 (29.1%) websites referred to smoking cessation, and 46 (30.5%) websites used multimedia to present information, such as short videos or podcasts.

CONCLUSIONS

Most websites of US lung cancer screening programs provide information about eligibility criteria, but this is not consistent and has not been updated across all websites following the latest USPSTF recommendations. Online resources require updating to present standardized information that is accessible for all.

摘要

背景

肺癌是全球癌症死亡的主要原因。美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)于2021年更新了肺癌筛查建议,将筛查年龄调整为50岁(从55岁),并将用于估计首次直接接触香烟总暴露量的包年数减少至20(从30)。鉴于许多人通过互联网查找医疗保健信息,了解为考虑进行肺癌筛查的个人提供了哪些信息非常重要。

目的

本研究旨在评估学术机构(n = 76)和社区医疗中心(n = 75)的151个肺癌筛查项目网站上可供医疗专业人员和潜在筛查参与者获取的资格标准和信息。

方法

2021年3月,对美国151个肺癌筛查项目网站进行了描述性横断面分析,这些网站包括学术机构(n = 76)和社区医疗中心(n = 75),提供了针对医疗专业人员和潜在筛查参与者的信息。潜在筛查参与者资格标准的呈现以及针对医疗专业人员的肺癌筛查特定信息的存在是主要结果。次要结果包括成本和戒烟信息的呈现、在线风险评估工具的纳入、对任何临床指南的提及以及使用多媒体呈现信息。

结果

几乎所有151个网站(n = 142,94%)都包含肺癌筛查的资格标准,以及年龄范围(n = 139,92.1%)和吸烟史(n = 141,93.4%)。年龄仅在14.5%(n = 22)的网站上与最新建议一致,且没有网站更新吸烟史。一半的网站(n = 76,50.3%)提到了与所持保险类型相关的筛查成本。共有23个(15.2%)网站设有在线评估工具来确定资格。相同比例(n = 23,15.2%)的网站提供了专门针对医疗专业人员的信息。总共有44个(29.1%)网站提到了戒烟,46个(30.5%)网站使用多媒体呈现信息,如短视频或播客。

结论

美国肺癌筛查项目的大多数网站提供了有关资格标准的信息,但这并不一致,且并非所有网站都根据USPSTF的最新建议进行了更新。在线资源需要更新,以提供所有人都能获取的标准化信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f92/9472061/caac8b6e0386/cancer_v8i3e34264_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f92/9472061/caac8b6e0386/cancer_v8i3e34264_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f92/9472061/caac8b6e0386/cancer_v8i3e34264_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Information Available for Health Professionals and Potential Participants on Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites: Cross-sectional Study.评估肺癌筛查项目网站上可供卫生专业人员和潜在参与者获取的信息:横断面研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Aug 30;8(3):e34264. doi: 10.2196/34264.
2
Cross-sectional review of US websites providing lung cancer screening recommendations following the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force updates.美国预防服务工作组 2021 年更新后提供肺癌筛查建议的美国网站的横断面回顾。
Clin Imaging. 2023 Jul;99:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.03.012. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
3
Evaluation of the Informational Content and Readability of US Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites.评估美国肺癌筛查计划网站的信息内容和可读性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1920431. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20431.
4
Assessment of Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites.肺癌筛查计划网站评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):824-830. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0111.
5
United States lung cancer screening program websites: radiology representation, multimedia and multilingual content.美国肺癌筛查项目网站:放射学呈现、多媒体及多语言内容。
Clin Imaging. 2022 Jun;86:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
6
Evaluation of Population-Level Changes Associated With the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Recommendations in Community-Based Health Care Systems.评估与 2021 年美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查建议相关的基于社区的医疗保健系统中的人群水平变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128176. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28176.
7
8
Evaluation of USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines Among African American Adult Smokers.对非裔美国成年吸烟者中美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查指南的评估
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;5(9):1318-1324. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1402.
9
Pack-Year Cigarette Smoking History for Determination of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility. Comparison of the Electronic Medical Record versus a Shared Decision-making Conversation.吸烟包年数在肺癌筛查资格中的应用。电子病历与共享决策对话的比较。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug;14(8):1320-1325. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-984OC.
10
Assessment of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility on NCI-Designated Cancer Center Websites.评估 NCI 指定癌症中心网站的肺癌筛查资格。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Dec;37(6):1849-1854. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02051-w. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing health sector websites assessment instrument: Challenges and pitfalls.开发卫生部门网站评估工具:挑战与陷阱。
Eval Program Plann. 2022 Jun;92:102065. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102065. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
2
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
3
Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377.
4
Addressing Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Healthcare Access. An Official American Thoracic Society Statement.解决肺癌筛查资格和医疗保健获取方面的差异。美国胸科学会官方声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 1;202(7):e95-e112. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202008-3053ST.
5
"We Just Never Have Enough Time": Clinician Views of Lung Cancer Screening Processes and Implementation.“我们总是时间不够用”:临床医生对肺癌筛查流程及实施情况的看法
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jun 4. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-262OC.
6
Assessment of Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites.肺癌筛查计划网站评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):824-830. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0111.
7
Use of an Online Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Patient Decision Aid in Primary Care Practices.在线乳腺癌风险评估和患者决策辅助工具在初级保健实践中的应用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jun;29(6):763-769. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8143. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
8
Evaluation of the Informational Content and Readability of US Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites.评估美国肺癌筛查计划网站的信息内容和可读性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1920431. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20431.
9
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial.随机试验中 CT 容积筛查降低肺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):503-513. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911793. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
10
Lung Cancer Screening Uptake in the United States.美国肺癌筛查的接受情况。
Chest. 2020 Jan;157(1):236-238. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.08.2176.