Suppr超能文献

用于高通量蛋白质组分析的稳健的毛细管和微流液相色谱-串联质谱方法

Robust Capillary- and Micro-Flow Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods for High-Throughput Proteome Profiling.

作者信息

Sui Xintong, Wu Qiong, Cui Xiaozhen, Wang Xi, Zhang Luobin, Deng Nan, Bian Yangyang, Xu Ruilian, Tian Ruijun

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.

Department of Oncology, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen 518020, China.

出版信息

J Proteome Res. 2022 Oct 7;21(10):2472-2480. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00405. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

Abstract

Capillary- and micro-flow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (capLC-MS/MS and μLC-MS/MS) is becoming a valuable alternative to nano-flow LC-MS/MS due to its high robustness and throughput. The systematic comparison of capLC-MS/MS and μLC-MS/MS systems for global proteome profiling has not been reported yet. Here, the capLC-MS/MS (150 μm i.d. column, 1 μL/min) and μLC-MS/MS (1 mm i.d. column, 50 μL/min) systems were both established based on UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano coupled to an Orbitrap Exploris 240 by integrating with different flowmeters. We evaluated both systems in terms of sensitivity, analysis throughput, separation efficiency, and robustness. capLC-MS/MS was about 10 times more sensitive than μLC-MS/MS at different gradient lengths. Compared with capLC-MS/MS, μLC-MS/MS was able to achieve higher analysis throughput and separation efficiency. During the 7 days' long-term performance test, both systems showed good reproducibility of chromatographic full width (RSD < 3%), retention time (RSD < 0.4%), and protein identification (RSD < 3%). These results demonstrate that capLC-MS/MS is more suitable for high-throughput analysis of clinical samples with a limited starting material. When enough samples are available, μLC-MS/MS is preferred. Together, capLC and μLC coupled to Orbitrap Exploris 240 with moderate sensitivity should well meet the needs of large-cohort clinical proteomic analysis.

摘要

毛细管流和微流液相色谱-串联质谱法(capLC-MS/MS和μLC-MS/MS)因其高稳健性和通量,正成为纳米流LC-MS/MS的一种有价值的替代方法。目前尚未见关于capLC-MS/MS和μLC-MS/MS系统用于全球蛋白质组分析的系统比较报道。在此,capLC-MS/MS(内径150μm柱,1μL/min)和μLC-MS/MS(内径1mm柱,50μL/min)系统均基于与不同流量计集成的UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano与Orbitrap Exploris 240联用建立。我们从灵敏度、分析通量、分离效率和稳健性方面对这两种系统进行了评估。在不同梯度长度下,capLC-MS/MS的灵敏度比μLC-MS/MS高约10倍。与capLC-MS/MS相比,μLC-MS/MS能够实现更高的分析通量和分离效率。在为期7天的长期性能测试中,两种系统在色谱峰全宽(RSD<3%)、保留时间(RSD<0.4%)和蛋白质鉴定(RSD<3%)方面均表现出良好的重现性。这些结果表明,capLC-MS/MS更适合于起始材料有限的临床样品的高通量分析。当有足够的样品时,优先选择μLC-MS/MS。总之,capLC和μLC与具有适度灵敏度的Orbitrap Exploris 240联用应能很好地满足大样本队列临床蛋白质组分析的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验