• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较二部式患者-医生网络的中心度测度:以阿片类镇痛药药物寻求为例的研究。

Comparing measures of centrality in bipartite patient-prescriber networks: A study of drug seeking for opioid analgesics.

机构信息

Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.

Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 30;17(8):e0273569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273569. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273569
PMID:36040880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9426918/
Abstract

Visiting multiple prescribers is a common method for obtaining prescription opioids for nonmedical use and has played an important role in fueling the United States opioid epidemic, leading to increased drug use disorder and overdose. Recent studies show that centrality of the bipartite network formed by prescription ties between patients and prescribers of opioids is a promising indicator for drug seeking. However, node prominence in bipartite networks is typically estimated with methods that do not fully account for the two-mode topology of the underlying network. Although several algorithms have been proposed recently to address this challenge, it is unclear how these algorithms perform on real-world networks. Here, we compare their performance in the context of identifying opioid drug seeking behaviors by applying them to massive bipartite networks of patients and providers extracted from insurance claims data. We find that two variants of bipartite centrality are significantly better predictors of subsequent opioid overdose than traditional centrality estimates. Moreover, we show that incorporating non-network attributes such as the potency of the opioid prescriptions into the measures can further improve their performance. These findings can be reproduced on different datasets. Our results demonstrate the potential of bipartiteness-aware indices for identifying patterns of high-risk behavior.

摘要

就诊多位医生是获取处方类阿片药物进行非医疗用途的常见方法,这种行为在美国阿片类药物泛滥中发挥了重要作用,导致药物使用障碍和过量用药的情况增加。最近的研究表明,由患者和开处方医生之间的处方联系形成的二分网络的中心性是一种有前途的觅药指标。然而,二分网络中节点的显著程度通常是使用未充分考虑底层网络的双模拓扑结构的方法来估计的。尽管最近已经提出了几种算法来解决这个问题,但尚不清楚这些算法在真实网络中的表现如何。在这里,我们通过将它们应用于从保险索赔数据中提取的大规模患者和提供者的二分网络,来比较它们在识别阿片类药物觅药行为方面的性能。我们发现,两种变体的二分中心性是随后阿片类药物过量的显著更好的预测指标,而不是传统的中心性估计。此外,我们表明,将非网络属性(如阿片类药物处方的效力)纳入这些指标中可以进一步提高它们的性能。这些发现可以在不同的数据集上重现。我们的研究结果表明,二分网络感知指标具有识别高风险行为模式的潜力。

相似文献

1
Comparing measures of centrality in bipartite patient-prescriber networks: A study of drug seeking for opioid analgesics.比较二部式患者-医生网络的中心度测度:以阿片类镇痛药药物寻求为例的研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 30;17(8):e0273569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273569. eCollection 2022.
2
New means, new measures: assessing prescription drug-seeking indicators over 10 years of the opioid epidemic.新方法,新措施:评估阿片类药物泛滥 10 年来的处方药物滥用指标。
Addiction. 2022 Jan;117(1):195-204. doi: 10.1111/add.15635. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
4
The effects of state rules on opioid prescribing in Indiana.印第安纳州的州法规对阿片类药物处方的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2830-6.
5
Association Between Receipt of Overlapping Opioid and Benzodiazepine Prescriptions From Multiple Prescribers and Overdose Risk.来自多个开处方者的重叠阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物处方与过量用药风险之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2120353. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20353.
6
Opioid Prescribing Behaviors - Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, 11 States, 2010-2016.阿片类药物处方行为-处方行为监测系统,11 个州,2010-2016 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020 Jan 31;69(1):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6901a1.
7
An Examination of Claims-based Predictors of Overdose from a Large Medicaid Program.对一个大型医疗补助计划中基于索赔的过量用药预测因素的考察。
Med Care. 2017 Mar;55(3):291-298. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000676.
8
THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC: MICHIGAN DOCTORS SEEKING SOLUTIONS.阿片类药物流行:密歇根州医生寻求解决方案。
Mich Med. 2017 Mar;116(2):16-19.
9
Vital Signs: Changes in Opioid Prescribing in the United States, 2006-2015.生命体征:2006 - 2015年美国阿片类药物处方的变化
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jul 7;66(26):697-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6626a4.
10
Trends in prior receipt of prescription opioid or adjuvant analgesics among patients with incident opioid use disorder or opioid-related overdose from 2006 to 2016.2006 年至 2016 年期间,新发阿片类药物使用障碍或阿片类药物相关过量患者中,预先使用处方类阿片或辅助类镇痛药的趋势。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107600. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107600. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.卫生服务研究中多层次患者共享网络措施的范围综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Jun;82(3):203-224. doi: 10.1177/10775587241304140. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
2
Network analysis of U.S. non-fatal opioid-involved overdose journeys, 2018-2023.2018 - 2023年美国非致命性阿片类药物过量使用历程的网络分析
Appl Netw Sci. 2024;9(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s41109-024-00661-z. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
3
BiRank: Fast and Flexible Ranking on Bipartite Networks with R and Python.

本文引用的文献

1
BiRank: Fast and Flexible Ranking on Bipartite Networks with R and Python.BiRank:使用R和Python在二分网络上进行快速灵活的排序
J Open Source Softw. 2020;5(51). doi: 10.21105/joss.02315. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
2
New means, new measures: assessing prescription drug-seeking indicators over 10 years of the opioid epidemic.新方法,新措施:评估阿片类药物泛滥 10 年来的处方药物滥用指标。
Addiction. 2022 Jan;117(1):195-204. doi: 10.1111/add.15635. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Co-prescription network reveals social dynamics of opioid doctor shopping.
BiRank:使用R和Python在二分网络上进行快速灵活的排序
J Open Source Softw. 2020;5(51). doi: 10.21105/joss.02315. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
共处方网络揭示了阿片类药物医生滥开处方的社会动态。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 25;14(10):e0223849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223849. eCollection 2019.
4
Opioid-Prescribing Patterns of Emergency Physicians and Risk of Long-Term Use.急诊医生的阿片类药物处方模式与长期使用风险
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):663-673. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1610524.
5
Prescription drug monitoring programs, nonmedical use of prescription drugs, and heroin use: Evidence from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health.处方药监测项目、处方药的非医疗使用及海洛因使用:来自全国药物使用和健康调查的证据
Addict Behav. 2017 Jun;69:65-77. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
6
Opioid analgesic and benzodiazepine prescribing among Medicaid-enrollees with opioid use disorders: The influence of provider communities.医疗补助计划中患有阿片类药物使用障碍的参保者的阿片类镇痛剂和苯二氮䓬类药物处方:医疗服务提供者群体的影响
J Addict Dis. 2017 Jan-Mar;36(1):14-22. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2016.1211784. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
7
Social network analysis of duplicative prescriptions: One-month analysis of medical facilities in Japan.重复处方的社会网络分析:日本医疗机构的一个月分析
Health Policy. 2016 Mar;120(3):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
8
Relationship between Nonmedical Prescription-Opioid Use and Heroin Use.非医疗处方阿片类药物使用与海洛因使用之间的关系。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 14;374(2):154-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1508490.
9
Nonmedical Prescription Opioid Use and Use Disorders Among Adults Aged 18 Through 64 Years in the United States, 2003-2013.非医疗目的处方阿片类药物使用和 18-64 岁美国成年人使用障碍:2003-2013 年。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 13;314(14):1468-78. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11859.
10
Provider Patient-Sharing Networks and Multiple-Provider Prescribing of Benzodiazepines.医疗服务提供者患者共享网络与苯二氮䓬类药物的多医疗服务提供者处方开具
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):164-171. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3470-8. Epub 2015 Jul 18.