Is Gene Editing Harmless? Two Arguments for Gene Editing.
作者信息
Savulescu Julian, Alonso Marcos
机构信息
Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford.
Murdoch Children's Research Institute.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Sep;22(9):23-28. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2105432.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Is Gene Editing Harmless? Two Arguments for Gene Editing.基因编辑无害吗？关于基因编辑的两种观点。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Sep;22(9):23-28. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2105432.
2
The Enduring Allure of Person-Affecting Arguments for Reproductive Technologies.生殖技术中影响人的论点的持久魅力。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Sep;22(9):44-46. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2105425.
3
Gene editing and the health of future generations.基因编辑与后代健康。
J R Soc Med. 2017 Jul;110(7):276-279. doi: 10.1177/0141076817705616. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
4
What Are the Wider Implications of Sparrow's Benefit Argument?
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Sep;22(9):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2105433.
5
Human Dignity and Gene Editing: Additional Support for Raposo's Arguments.人的尊严与基因编辑：对拉波索论点的进一步支持。
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Jun;17(2):165-168. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-09969-8. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
6
Human dignity and gene editing: Using human dignity as an argument against modifying the human genome and germline is a logical fallacy.人类尊严与基因编辑：将人类尊严作为反对修改人类基因组和生殖系的论据是一种逻辑谬误。
EMBO Rep. 2018 Oct;19(10). doi: 10.15252/embr.201846789. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
7
Let Us Assume That Gene Editing is Safe-The Role of Safety Arguments in the Gene Editing Debate.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Jan;28(1):100-111. doi: 10.1017/S0963180118000439.
8
Why gene editing isn't the answer.为什么基因编辑不是答案。
J R Soc Med. 2017 Jul;110(7):280-282. doi: 10.1177/0141076817706278. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
9
Understanding opposition to human gene editing理解反对人类基因编辑
Politics Life Sci. 2020 Nov 18;39(2):154-166. doi: 10.1017/pls.2020.12.
10
Major CRISPR patent decision won't end tangled dispute.重大CRISPR专利裁决不会终结复杂的争端。
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7901):373-374. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00629-y.
Zotero 插件