Suppr超能文献

避孕措施供应调查中产品可得性估计的偏差:来自消费者计划生育市场(CM4FP)研究的证据。

Bias in product availability estimates from contraceptive outlet surveys: Evidence from the Consumer's Market for Family Planning (CM4FP) study.

机构信息

Population Services International, Nairobi, Kenya.

Biostat Global Consulting, Worthington, Ohio, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 30;17(8):e0271896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271896. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Area-based sampling approaches designed to capture pharmacies, drug shops, and other non-facility service delivery outlets are critical for accurately measuring the contraceptive service environment in contexts of increasing de-medicalization of contraceptive commodities and services. Evidence from other disciplines has demonstrated area-based estimates may be biased if there is spatial heterogeneity in product distribution, but this bias has not yet been assessed in the context of contraceptive supply estimates. The Consumer's Marker for Family Planning (CM4FP) study conducted censuses and product audits of contraceptive outlets across 12 study sites and 2-3 rounds of quarterly data collection in Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda. We assessed bias in estimates of contraceptive product availability by comparing estimates from simulations of area-based sampling approaches with census counts among all audited facilities for each study site and round of data collection. We found evidence of bias in estimates of contraceptive availability generated from simulated area-based sampling. Within specific study sites and rounds, we observed biased sampling estimates for several but not all contraceptive method types, with bias more likely to occur in sites with heterogeneity in both spatial distribution of outlets and product availability within outlets. In simulations varying size of enumeration areas (EA) and number of outlets sampled per EA, we demonstrated that the likelihood of substantial bias decreases as EA size decreases and as the number of outlets sampled per EA increases. Straightforward approaches such as increasing sample size per EA or applying statistical weights may be used to reduce area-based sampling bias, indicating a pragmatic way forward to improve estimates where design-based sampling is infeasible. Such approaches should be considered in development of improved methods for area-based estimates of contraceptive supply-side environments.

摘要

基于区域的抽样方法旨在涵盖药店、药房和其他非医疗机构服务点,对于准确衡量避孕服务环境至关重要,因为避孕商品和服务越来越呈现去医疗机构化趋势。其他学科的证据表明,如果产品分布存在空间异质性,基于区域的估计可能存在偏差,但这种偏差在避孕供应估计的背景下尚未得到评估。消费者计划生育标记物(CM4FP)研究在肯尼亚、尼日利亚和乌干达的 12 个研究地点进行了普查,并对避孕用品进行了产品审计,每季度进行 2-3 轮数据收集。我们通过比较基于区域抽样方法模拟得出的估计数与每个研究地点和数据收集轮次中所有经过审计的设施的普查计数,评估了避孕产品可得性估计数的偏差。我们发现,基于模拟的区域抽样方法得出的避孕可得性估计数存在偏差。在特定的研究地点和轮次中,我们观察到几种但不是所有避孕方法类型的抽样估计存在偏差,在网点空间分布和网点内产品可得性均存在异质性的地点,偏差更有可能发生。在不同大小的普查区(EA)和每个 EA 抽样网点数量的模拟中,我们证明,随着 EA 规模的缩小和每个 EA 抽样网点数量的增加,出现大量偏差的可能性降低。可以采用增加每个 EA 的样本量或应用统计权重等简单方法来减少基于区域的抽样偏差,这表明在设计抽样不可行的情况下,有一个切实可行的方法可以改进估计。在开发改进的基于区域的避孕供应方环境估计方法时,应考虑这些方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8baa/9426883/f0a43c9c0bbf/pone.0271896.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验