• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生机构可达性措施对刚果民主共和国金沙萨现代避孕措施使用的影响。

The influence of health facility-level access measures on modern contraceptive use in Kinshasa, DRC.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.

Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236018. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0236018
PMID:32701979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7377448/
Abstract

Expanding access to family planning (FP) is a principal objective of global family planning efforts and has been a driving force of national family planning programs in recent years. Many country programs are working alongside with the international family planning community to expand access to modern contraceptives. However, there is a challenging need for measuring all aspects of access. Measuring access usually requires linking information from multiple sources (e.g., individual women and facilities). To assess the influence of access to family planning services on modern contraceptive use among women, we link four rounds of individual women and service delivery points survey data from PMA2020 in Kinshasa. Multilevel logistics regression on pooled data is performed to test the influence of facility-level access factors on individual-level contraceptive use. We add variables tailored from a conceptual framework to cover elements of access to family planning: administrative access, geographic or physical access, economic access or affordability, cognitive access, service quality, and psychological access. We find that the effect of community and facility-level access factors varies extensively but having fewer stocked-out facilities and more facilities with long-acting permanent methods (LAPM) increases the odds of using modern contraceptives among women in Kinshasa. Our study shows that reliable supply chain with a broad array of method mix will increase the odds of modern contraceptive use at community level among women in Kinshasa. Using to community-oriented practices and service delivery along with empowering women to make health-related decisions should become a priority of family planning programs and international stakeholders in the country.

摘要

扩大计划生育(FP)的可及性是全球计划生育工作的主要目标,也是近年来国家计划生育项目的推动力量。许多国家项目正在与国际计划生育界合作,以扩大现代避孕药具的可及性。然而,衡量可及性的各个方面存在着具有挑战性的需求。衡量可及性通常需要将来自多个来源(例如,个体妇女和设施)的信息联系起来。为了评估计划生育服务可及性对妇女使用现代避孕药具的影响,我们将 PMA2020 在金沙萨的四轮个体妇女和服务提供点调查数据联系起来。对汇总数据进行多层次逻辑回归,以检验设施层面可及性因素对个体层面避孕药具使用的影响。我们添加了根据概念框架量身定制的变量,以涵盖计划生育可及性的各个要素:行政可及性、地理或物理可及性、经济可及性或负担能力、认知可及性、服务质量和心理可及性。我们发现,社区和设施层面可及性因素的影响广泛,但库存不足的设施减少和具有长效永久方法(LAPM)的设施增多,都会增加金沙萨妇女使用现代避孕药具的几率。我们的研究表明,可靠的供应链和广泛的方法组合将增加金沙萨社区层面妇女使用现代避孕药具的几率。以社区为导向的实践和服务提供,以及赋予妇女做出与健康相关的决策的权力,应该成为计划生育项目和国家国际利益相关者的优先事项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f2/7377448/854074ea92fd/pone.0236018.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f2/7377448/870f7be1cbdd/pone.0236018.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f2/7377448/854074ea92fd/pone.0236018.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f2/7377448/870f7be1cbdd/pone.0236018.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f2/7377448/854074ea92fd/pone.0236018.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of health facility-level access measures on modern contraceptive use in Kinshasa, DRC.卫生机构可达性措施对刚果民主共和国金沙萨现代避孕措施使用的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236018. eCollection 2020.
2
Family Planning Supply Environment in Kinshasa, DRC: Survey Findings and Their Value in Advancing Family Planning Programming.金沙萨计划生育供应环境:调查结果及其在推进计划生育规划方面的价值。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Dec 17;3(4):630-45. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00298. Print 2015 Dec.
3
Assessing the contraceptive supply environment in Kinshasa, DRC: trend data from PMA2020.评估刚果民主共和国金沙萨的避孕供应环境:来自 PMA2020 的趋势数据。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Mar 1;33(2):155-162. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx134.
4
Effectiveness of post-partum family planning interventions on contraceptive use and method mix at 1 year after childbirth in Kinshasa, DR Congo (Yam Daabo): a single-blind, cluster-randomised controlled trial.刚果民主共和国金沙萨产后计划生育干预措施对产后 1 年避孕方法使用和方法组合的效果(Yam Daabo):一项单盲、整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Mar;8(3):e399-e410. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30546-7. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
5
Differences in family planning outcomes between military and general populations in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a cross-sectional analysis.刚果民主共和国金沙萨的军人和普通人群在计划生育结局方面的差异:一项横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e022295. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022295.
6
Individual, community and service environment factors associated with modern contraceptive use in five Sub-Saharan African countries: A multilevel, multinomial analysis using geographically linked data from PMA2020.个体、社区和服务环境因素与撒哈拉以南非洲五个国家现代避孕方法使用的关联:使用 PMA2020 的地理关联数据进行的多层次多项分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218157. eCollection 2019.
7
Effect of Family Planning Counseling After Delivery on Contraceptive Use at 24 Weeks Postpartum in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.刚果民主共和国金沙萨产后计划生育咨询对产后24周避孕措施使用情况的影响
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Apr;23(4):530-537. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2667-y.
8
Task-shifting and family planning continuation: contraceptive trajectories of women who received their method at a community-based event in Kinshasa, DRC.任务转移与计划生育延续:在刚果民主共和国金沙萨的一个社区活动中获得方法的女性的避孕轨迹。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 30;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01571-6.
9
Trends in contraceptive prevalence rates in sub-Saharan Africa since the 2012 London Summit on Family Planning: results from repeated cross-sectional surveys.撒哈拉以南非洲地区自 2012 年计划生育问题伦敦峰会以来的避孕普及率趋势:来自重复横断面调查的结果。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul;7(7):e904-e911. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30200-1. Epub 2019 May 17.
10
Determinants of the use of contraceptive methods by adolescents in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: results of a cross-sectional survey.刚果民主共和国青少年使用避孕方法的决定因素:一项横断面调查的结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Nov 28;22(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02084-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cohort Profile: The Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) panel surveys.队列简介:行动绩效监测(PMA)小组调查
Int J Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 16;54(1). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae180.
2
Factors that influence modern contraceptive use among women aged 35 to 49 years and their male partners in Gomoa West District, Ghana: a qualitative study.加纳戈莫阿西区35至49岁女性及其男性伴侣现代避孕方法使用的影响因素:一项定性研究
Trop Med Health. 2023 Aug 3;51(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41182-023-00531-x.
3
Bias in product availability estimates from contraceptive outlet surveys: Evidence from the Consumer's Market for Family Planning (CM4FP) study.

本文引用的文献

1
Bypassing health facilities in rural Mozambique: spatial, institutional, and individual determinants.绕过莫桑比克农村地区的卫生设施:空间、机构和个体决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3834-y.
2
Differences in family planning outcomes between military and general populations in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a cross-sectional analysis.刚果民主共和国金沙萨的军人和普通人群在计划生育结局方面的差异:一项横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e022295. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022295.
3
Partner Support for Family Planning and Modern Contraceptive Use in Luanda, Angola.
避孕措施供应调查中产品可得性估计的偏差:来自消费者计划生育市场(CM4FP)研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 30;17(8):e0271896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271896. eCollection 2022.
4
Maternal education level and maternal healthcare utilization in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: an analysis of the multiple indicator cluster survey 2017/18.刚果民主共和国孕产妇教育水平和孕产妇医疗保健利用情况:2017/18 年多指标类集调查分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):850. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06854-x.
安哥拉罗安达地区伴侣对计划生育及现代避孕方法使用的支持
Afr J Reprod Health. 2017 Jun;21(2):35-48. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2017/v21i2.5.
4
Family Planning in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Encouraging Momentum, Formidable Challenges.刚果民主共和国的计划生育:鼓励势头,巨大挑战。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Mar 30;6(1):40-54. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00346. Print 2018 Mar 21.
5
PMA2020: Rapid Turn-Around Survey Data to Monitor Family Planning Service and Practice in Ten Countries.2020年避孕药具市场评估:利用快速周转调查数据监测十个国家的计划生育服务与实践情况
Stud Fam Plann. 2017 Sep;48(3):293-303. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12031. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
6
Factors Influencing Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区避孕药具使用的影响因素:一项系统综述。
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2017 Jan;37(2):79-91. doi: 10.1177/0272684X16685254. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
Measuring Access to Family Planning: Conceptual Frameworks and DHS Data.衡量计划生育服务的可及性:概念框架与人口与健康调查数据
Stud Fam Plann. 2016 Jun;47(2):145-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2016.00059.x.
8
Why women bypass front-line health facility services in pursuit of obstetric care provided elsewhere: a case study in three rural districts of Tanzania.为何女性绕过一线医疗机构服务转而寻求其他地方提供的产科护理:坦桑尼亚三个农村地区的案例研究
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Apr;21(4):504-14. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12672. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
Social network- and community-level influences on contraceptive use: evidence from rural Poland.社交网络和社区层面因素对避孕措施使用的影响:来自波兰农村地区的证据
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 May 22;282(1807):20150398. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0398.
10
Aligning goals, intents, and performance indicators in family planning service delivery.在计划生育服务提供中协调目标、意图和绩效指标。
Stud Fam Plann. 2015 Mar;46(1):97-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2015.00017.x.