School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Center for Behavioral Health and Justice, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(12):1828-1836. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2115853. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
Provider attitudes can be a powerful reinforcer of stigma toward medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). This study examines attitudes toward MOUD among substance use treatment providers and identifies personal and professional characteristics associated with more positive attitudes. Treatment providers (N = 570) working at publicly-funded substance use programs in Michigan self-administered a web-based survey (November 2020 through July 2021), reporting their socio-demographics, professional experience, and attitudes toward MOUD. Linear regression was used to identify factors associated with general attitudes toward MOUD and three logistic regression models were calculated to identify factors associated with perceptions of each medication. Half of providers considered methadone an effective treatment (53.0%); 62.9% considered buprenorphine effective, and 70.3% considered naltrexone effective. Receipt of training (B = 1.433, = .009) and serving pregnant women or women with children (B = 1.662, < .001) were associated with more positive attitudes toward MOUD. Providers with advanced degrees were more likely to consider methadone (OR = 2.264, = .006), buprenorphine (OR = 2.192, = .009), and naltrexone (OR = 2.310, = .011) effective. Rural providers were more likely to consider naltrexone effective (OR = 2.708, = .003). Providers working with criminal legal populations were more likely to consider buprenorphine (OR = 2.948, = .041) and naltrexone (OR = 4.108, = .010) effective, but not methadone. Treatment providers' attitudes remain poorly aligned with the evidence base. Increased efforts are needed to address attitudes toward MOUD among the specialized treatment workforce.
提供者的态度可能是对阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物治疗产生污名化的强大因素。本研究考察了物质使用治疗提供者对 MOUD 的态度,并确定了与更积极的态度相关的个人和专业特征。在密歇根州接受公共资助的物质使用项目工作的治疗提供者(N=570)自行进行了一项基于网络的调查(2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 7 月),报告了他们的社会人口统计学、专业经验和对 MOUD 的态度。线性回归用于确定与 MOUD 一般态度相关的因素,计算了三个逻辑回归模型以确定与每种药物的认知相关的因素。一半的提供者认为美沙酮是一种有效的治疗方法(53.0%);62.9%的人认为丁丙诺啡有效,70.3%的人认为纳曲酮有效。接受培训(B=1.433, =.009)和为孕妇或有子女的妇女服务(B=1.662, <.001)与对 MOUD 的更积极态度相关。具有高等学历的提供者更有可能认为美沙酮(OR=2.264, =.006)、丁丙诺啡(OR=2.192, =.009)和纳曲酮(OR=2.310, =.011)有效。农村提供者更有可能认为纳曲酮有效(OR=2.708, =.003)。与刑事法律人群接触的提供者更有可能认为丁丙诺啡(OR=2.948, =.041)和纳曲酮(OR=4.108, =.010)有效,但不是美沙酮。治疗提供者的态度仍然与证据基础严重不符。需要加大力度解决专门治疗人员队伍对 MOUD 的态度问题。