Suppr超能文献

关于午后小睡对认知影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analyses on the effects of afternoon napping on cognition.

作者信息

Leong Ruth L F, Lo June C, Chee Michael W L

机构信息

Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Sleep Med Rev. 2022 Oct;65:101666. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101666. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

Abstract

Naps are increasingly considered a means to boost cognitive performance. We quantified the cognitive effects of napping in 60 samples from 54 studies. 52 samples evaluated memory. We first evaluated effect sizes for all tests together, before separately assessing their effects on memory, vigilance, speed of processing and executive function. We next examined whether nap effects were moderated by study features of age, nap length, nap start time, habituality and prior sleep restriction. Naps showed significant benefits for the total aggregate of cognitive tests (Cohen's d = 0.379, CI = 0.296-0.462). Significant domain specific effects were present for declarative (Cohen's d = 0.376, CI = 0.269-0.482) and procedural memory (Cohen's d = 0.494, CI = 0.301-0.686), vigilance (Cohen's d = 0.610, CI = 0.291-0.929) and speed of processing (Cohen's d = 0.211, CI = 0.052-0.369). There were no significant moderation effects of any of the study features. Nap effects were of comparable magnitude across subgroups of each of the 5 moderators (Q values = 0.009 to 8.572, p values > 0.116). Afternoon naps have a small to medium benefit over multiple cognitive tests. These effects transcend age, nap duration and tentatively, habituality and prior nocturnal sleep.

摘要

小睡越来越被视为提高认知能力的一种方式。我们对来自54项研究的60个样本中小睡的认知效果进行了量化。52个样本评估了记忆力。我们首先一起评估了所有测试的效应量,然后分别评估它们对记忆力、警觉性、处理速度和执行功能的影响。接下来,我们研究了小睡效果是否受到年龄、小睡时长、小睡开始时间、习惯性和先前睡眠限制等研究特征的调节。小睡对认知测试的总体汇总显示出显著益处(科恩d值 = 0.379,置信区间 = 0.296 - 0.462)。陈述性记忆(科恩d值 = 0.376,置信区间 = 0.269 - 0.482)、程序性记忆(科恩d值 = 0.494,置信区间 = 0.301 - 0.686)、警觉性(科恩d值 = 0.610,置信区间 = 0.291 - 0.929)和处理速度(科恩d值 = 0.211,置信区间 = 0.052 - 0.369)存在显著的特定领域效应。没有任何研究特征产生显著的调节效应。在5个调节因素的每个亚组中,小睡效果的大小相当(Q值 = 0.009至8.572,p值 > 0.116)。下午小睡对多项认知测试有小到中等程度的益处。这些效果不受年龄、小睡时长的影响,暂时不受习惯性和先前夜间睡眠的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验