Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Department of Philosophy, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 30;12(8):e055656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055656.
There are many case studies of corporations that have worked to undermine health policy implementation. It is unclear whether countries that are more exposed to corporate financial influence are systematically less likely to implement robust health policies that target firms' financial interests. We aim to assess the association between corporate financial influence and implementation of WHO-recommended policies to constrain sales, marketing and consumption of tobacco, alcohol and unhealthy foods.
We will perform a cross-sectional analysis of 172 WHO Member States using national datasets from 2015, 2017 and 2020. We will use random effects generalised least squares regression to test the association between implementation status of 12 WHO-recommended tobacco, alcohol and diet policies, and , a metric that combines disclosure of campaign donations, public campaign finance, corporate campaign donations, legislature corrupt activities, disclosure by politicians and executive oversight. We will control for GDP per capita, population aged >65 years (%), urbanisation (%), level of democracy, continent, ethno-linguistic fractionalisation, legal origin, UN-defined 'Small Island Developing States' and Muslim population (%) (to capture alcohol policy differences). We will include year dummies to address the possibility of a spurious relationship between the outcome variable and the independent variables of interests. For example, there may be an upward global trend in policy implementation that coincides with an upward global trend in the regulation of lobbying and campaign finance.
As this study uses publicly available data, ethics approval is not required. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication in the academic literature. All data, code and syntax will be made publicly available on GitHub.
有许多关于企业破坏卫生政策实施的案例研究。目前尚不清楚,那些更容易受到企业财务影响的国家,是否更不可能系统地实施针对企业财务利益的强有力的卫生政策。我们旨在评估企业财务影响与实施世界卫生组织(WHO)建议的限制烟草、酒精和不健康食品销售、营销和消费的政策之间的关联。
我们将使用 2015 年、2017 年和 2020 年的国家数据集,对 172 个世界卫生组织成员国进行横断面分析。我们将使用随机效应广义最小二乘法回归,检验 12 项世界卫生组织建议的烟草、酒精和饮食政策的实施情况与 的关联, 是一个综合了竞选捐款披露、公共竞选融资、企业竞选捐款、立法机构腐败活动、政客披露和行政监督的指标。我们将控制人均国内生产总值、65 岁以上人口(%)、城市化(%)、民主程度、大陆、民族语言分裂、法律渊源、联合国定义的“小岛屿发展中国家”和穆斯林人口(%)(以捕捉酒精政策差异)。我们将包括年份哑变量,以解决因结果变量与利益相关的独立变量之间存在虚假关系的可能性。例如,政策实施的全球上升趋势可能与游说和竞选融资监管的全球上升趋势同时出现。
由于本研究使用的是公开可用的数据,因此不需要伦理批准。作者没有利益冲突需要申报。研究结果将提交给同行评议的期刊,发表在学术文献中。所有数据、代码和语法都将在 GitHub 上公开。