Division of Nephrology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):383-391. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04310422. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is a vital, supportive treatment for patients with critical illness and severe AKI. The optimal timing, dose, and modality of KRT have been studied extensively, but gaps in knowledge remain. With respect to modalities, continuous KRT and intermittent hemodialysis are well-established options, but prolonged intermittent KRT is becoming more prevalent worldwide, particularly in emerging countries. Compared with continuous KRT, prolonged intermittent KRT offers similar hemodynamic stability and overall cost savings, and its intermittent nature allows patients time off therapy for mobilization and procedures. When compared with intermittent hemodialysis, prolonged intermittent KRT offers more hemodynamic stability, particularly in patients who remain highly vulnerable to hypotension from aggressive ultrafiltration over a shorter duration of treatment. The prescription of prolonged intermittent KRT can be tailored to patients' progression in their recovery from critical illness, and the frequency, flow rates, and duration of treatment can be modified to avert hemodynamic instability during de-escalation of care. Dosing of prolonged intermittent KRT can be extrapolated from urea kinetics used to calculate clearance for continuous KRT and intermittent hemodialysis. Practice variations across institutions with respect to terminology, prescription, and dosing of prolonged intermittent KRT create significant challenges, especially in creating specific drug dosing recommendations during prolonged intermittent KRT. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, prolonged intermittent KRT was rapidly implemented to meet the KRT demands during patient surges in some of the medical centers overwhelmed by sheer volume of patients with AKI. Ideally, implementation of prolonged intermittent KRT at any institution should be conducted in a timely manner, with judicious planning and collaboration among nephrology, critical care, dialysis and intensive care nursing, and pharmacy leadership. Future analyses and clinical trials with respect to prescription and delivery of prolonged intermittent KRT and clinical outcomes will help to guide standardization of practice.
肾脏替代治疗(KRT)是危重病和严重急性肾损伤患者的重要支持性治疗。KRT 的最佳时机、剂量和方式已经得到了广泛的研究,但知识仍存在空白。就方式而言,连续 KRT 和间歇性血液透析是成熟的选择,但在全球范围内,尤其是在新兴国家,长时间间歇性 KRT 越来越流行。与连续 KRT 相比,长时间间歇性 KRT 提供了相似的血流动力学稳定性和总体成本节约,其间歇性特点使患者有时间在治疗期间进行活动和手术。与间歇性血液透析相比,长时间间歇性 KRT 提供了更稳定的血流动力学,特别是在那些因在较短的治疗时间内进行积极超滤而仍然非常容易低血压的患者中。长时间间歇性 KRT 的处方可以根据患者从危重病中恢复的进展情况进行调整,治疗的频率、流速和持续时间可以进行修改,以避免在护理降级期间出现血流动力学不稳定。长时间间歇性 KRT 的剂量可以从用于计算连续 KRT 和间歇性血液透析清除率的尿素动力学中推断出来。不同机构在长时间间歇性 KRT 的术语、处方和剂量方面存在实践差异,这带来了重大挑战,特别是在制定长时间间歇性 KRT 期间的特定药物剂量建议时。在 2019 年冠状病毒病大流行期间,一些医疗中心因急性肾损伤患者数量过多而不堪重负,为满足患者激增的 KRT 需求,迅速实施了长时间间歇性 KRT。理想情况下,任何机构实施长时间间歇性 KRT 都应及时进行,需要肾脏病学、重症监护、透析和重症监护护理以及药剂科领导层之间进行明智的规划和协作。关于长时间间歇性 KRT 的处方和交付以及临床结果的未来分析和临床试验将有助于指导实践的标准化。