• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是什么推动了计划生育专业人员的知识寻求、分享和应用?来自非洲、亚洲和美国的行为证据。

What Drives Knowledge Seeking, Sharing, and Use Among Family Planning Professionals? Behavioral Evidence From Africa, Asia, and the United States.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Busara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Aug 30;10(4). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00036.

DOI:10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00036
PMID:36041846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9426987/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To contribute to strengthening family planning and reproductive health (FP/RH) programs by identifying behavioral factors that influence FP/RH professionals' knowledge management (KM) behaviors.

METHODS

We conducted an online survey, in-depth interviews, and cocreation workshops between July 2019 and June 2020 with a convenience sample of FP/RH professionals in Africa, Asia, and the United States to explore their KM behaviors. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the survey data and inductive thematic analysis for the interviews, and we synthesized participant inputs from selected cocreation activities.

RESULTS

The samples consisted of 273 survey respondents, 23 interviewees, and 69 cocreation workshop participants. There were no significant differences in how professionals seek and share information by gender, role, or geographic region, except related to language barriers among Francophone professionals. FP/RH professionals reported using both digital sources and their professional networks to seek and share information. Choice overload and cognitive overload (when people are presented with too much information and in a way that is hard to understand, respectively) act as barriers as they seek and use information. Too many information sources lead to frustration and inaction and best practices are often not contextualized or specific enough for application. Positive KM organizational cultures help facilitate effective information sharing, but reluctance to share information persists due to fear of losing comparative advantage. FP/RH professionals noted that such barriers result in duplication of effort and lack of advancement in FP/RH programs.

CONCLUSION

To improve overall program impact, KM interventions in FP/RH and global health should reduce cognitive and choice overload, especially by curating and sharing practical, actionable information with essential details on context and how programs are implemented so that others can apply or adapt the learnings. Programs should use incentives to foster motivation to share this type of information.

摘要

目的

通过识别影响计划生育和生殖健康(FP/RH)专业人员知识管理(KM)行为的行为因素,为加强计划生育和生殖健康方案做出贡献。

方法

我们于 2019 年 7 月至 2020 年 6 月间采用便利抽样方法,对非洲、亚洲和美国的 FP/RH 专业人员进行了在线调查、深入访谈和共创工作坊,以探讨他们的 KM 行为。我们使用描述性统计分析来分析调查数据,并对访谈进行归纳主题分析,综合了部分共创活动中参与者的投入。

结果

样本包括 273 名调查对象、23 名访谈对象和 69 名共创工作坊参与者。除了讲法语的专业人员存在语言障碍外,专业人员的性别、角色或地理区域对他们获取和分享信息的方式没有显著差异。FP/RH 专业人员报告称,他们既使用数字资源,也利用专业网络来获取和分享信息。信息过载和认知过载(分别指人们面对过多信息且难以理解的情况)会阻碍他们获取和使用信息。过多的信息来源会导致沮丧和无所作为,而最佳实践通常无法根据具体情况进行调整或具体应用。积极的 KM 组织文化有助于促进有效的信息共享,但由于担心失去相对优势,专业人员仍然不愿分享信息。FP/RH 专业人员指出,这些障碍导致 FP/RH 方案的工作重复且缺乏进展。

结论

为了提高整体方案的影响力,FP/RH 和全球健康中的 KM 干预措施应减少认知和选择过载,尤其是通过策划和分享实用、可操作的信息,并提供有关背景和方案实施方式的关键细节,以便其他人可以应用或调整学习内容。方案应使用激励措施来促进分享此类信息的动机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49c/9426987/72dc1e6e0c1a/GH-GHSP220079F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49c/9426987/b72006399fbb/GH-GHSP220079F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49c/9426987/f95ff83ae9a5/GH-GHSP220079F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49c/9426987/72dc1e6e0c1a/GH-GHSP220079F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49c/9426987/b72006399fbb/GH-GHSP220079F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49c/9426987/f95ff83ae9a5/GH-GHSP220079F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49c/9426987/72dc1e6e0c1a/GH-GHSP220079F003.jpg

相似文献

1
What Drives Knowledge Seeking, Sharing, and Use Among Family Planning Professionals? Behavioral Evidence From Africa, Asia, and the United States.是什么推动了计划生育专业人员的知识寻求、分享和应用?来自非洲、亚洲和美国的行为证据。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Aug 30;10(4). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00036.
2
[Family planning programs and birth control in the third world].[第三世界的计划生育项目与节育]
Demogr Inf. 1991:17-34, 153.
3
Quality of care: from concept to action. A way ahead for sub-Saharan Africa FP and RH programmes.医疗服务质量:从概念到行动。撒哈拉以南非洲计划生育与生殖健康项目的前行之路。
Afr J Fertil Sexual Reprod Heal. 1996 Dec;1(2):85-91.
4
Demonstrating. FP / RH.演示。卵泡期/黄体期。
Integration. 1998 Spring(55):6-9.
5
[Propaganda work is still a weak link in rural family planning].宣传工作仍是农村计划生育工作中的薄弱环节。
Ren Kou Xue Kan. 1991 Feb(1):63-4.
6
Effects on Career Development From Sharing One's Story: Young Professionals' Experiences With Family Planning Voices.分享个人经历对职业发展的影响:年轻专业人士在计划生育宣传活动中的经历
Health Promot Pract. 2020 May;21(3):336-339. doi: 10.1177/1524839920902758. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
7
Male partner influence on family planning and contraceptive use: perspectives from community members and healthcare providers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省社区成员和医疗保健提供者对男性伴侣在计划生育和避孕措施使用方面的影响:观点。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 25;16(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0749-y.
8
The buzz outside the clinics: conversations and contraception in Nyanza Province, Kenya.诊所外的热议:肯尼亚尼扬扎省的对话与避孕措施
Stud Fam Plann. 1997 Dec;28(4):290-307.
9
The community as a driving force.社区作为驱动力。
JOICFP News. 1993 Dec(234):4-5.
10
The power of women's and men's Social Networks to catalyse normative and behavioural change: evaluation of an intervention addressing Unmet need for Family Planning in Benin.女性和男性社会网络促进规范和行为改变的力量:评估一项针对贝宁计划生育未满足需求的干预措施。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12681-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging a Partnership to Disseminate and Implement What Works in Family Planning and Reproductive Health: The Implementing Best Practices (IBP) Initiative.利用伙伴关系传播和实施计划生育和生殖健康方面的有效做法:实施最佳实践倡议(IBP)。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 29;7(1):12-19. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00236. Print 2019 Mar 22.
2
Knowledge Management Framework for Emerging Infectious Diseases Preparedness and Response: Design and Development of Public Health Document Ontology.新兴传染病防范与应对的知识管理框架:公共卫生文档本体的设计与开发
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Oct 11;6(10):e196. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7904.
3
Programme Reporting Standards (PRS) for improving the reporting of sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health programmes.
改善性健康、生殖健康、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康项目报告的项目报告标准
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 3;17(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0384-7.
4
Looking Through a Social Lens: Conceptualising Social Aspects of Knowledge Management for Global Health Practitioners.透过社会视角:为全球卫生从业者构建知识管理的社会层面概念
J Public Health Res. 2017 Apr 18;6(1):761. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2017.761. eCollection 2017 Apr 13.
5
When knowledge is demotivating: subjective knowledge and choice overload.当知识令人沮丧时:主观知识与选择过载。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;25(9):1739-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797614539165. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
6
Meeting the health information needs of health workers: what have we learned?满足卫生工作者的健康信息需求:我们学到了什么?
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 2:23-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.666626.
7
Empowering people and organizations through information.通过信息赋予人们和组织力量。
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 2:1-4. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.670553.