• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 ANFIS-PSO 模型的经皮冠状动脉介入术后主要不良心血管事件(MACCE)的智能预测。

Intelligent prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE) following percutaneous coronary intervention using ANFIS-PSO model.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Department of Biostatistics, Research Center for Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 4171-65175, Hamadan, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02825-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-022-02825-0
PMID:36042392
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9429694/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to use the hybrid method based on an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) to predict the long term occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) of patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study included a total of 220 patients (69 women and 151 men) who underwent PCI in Ekbatan medical center in Hamadan city, Iran, from March 2009 to March 2012. The occurrence and non-occurrence of MACCE, (including death, CABG, stroke, repeat revascularization) were considered as a binary outcome. The predictive performance of ANFIS model for predicting MACCE was compared with ANFIS-PSO and logistic regression.

RESULTS

During ten years of follow-up, ninety-six patients (43.6%) experienced the MACCE event. By applying multivariate logistic regression, the traditional predictors such as age (OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02-1.09), smoking (OR = 3.53, 95%CI: 1.61-7.75), diabetes (OR = 2.17, 95%CI: 2.05-16.20) and stent length (OR = 3.12, 95%CI: 1.48-6.57) was significantly predicable to MACCE. The ANFIS-PSO model had higher accuracy (89%) compared to the ANFIS (81%) and logistic regression (72%) in the prediction of MACCE.

CONCLUSION

The predictive performance of ANFIS-PSO is more efficient than the other models in the prediction of MACCE. It is recommended to use this model for intelligent monitoring, classification of high-risk patients and allocation of necessary medical and health resources based on the needs of these patients. However, the clinical value of these findings should be tested in a larger dataset.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在采用基于自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)和粒子群优化(PSO)的混合方法,预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和支架植入术的患者发生主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)的长期预后。

方法

本回顾性队列研究共纳入 220 名(69 名女性和 151 名男性)于 2009 年 3 月至 2012 年 3 月在伊朗哈马丹市埃克巴坦医疗中心接受 PCI 的患者。MACCE 的发生和未发生(包括死亡、CABG、卒中和再次血运重建)被视为二项结局。比较了 ANFIS 模型、ANFIS-PSO 模型和逻辑回归模型预测 MACCE 的预测性能。

结果

在十年的随访期间,96 名患者(43.6%)发生了 MACCE 事件。通过多变量逻辑回归,年龄(OR=1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.09)、吸烟(OR=3.53,95%CI:1.61-7.75)、糖尿病(OR=2.17,95%CI:2.05-16.20)和支架长度(OR=3.12,95%CI:1.48-6.57)等传统预测因素对 MACCE 有显著预测价值。与 ANFIS(81%)和逻辑回归(72%)相比,ANFIS-PSO 模型在预测 MACCE 方面具有更高的准确性(89%)。

结论

与其他模型相比,ANFIS-PSO 模型在预测 MACCE 方面的预测性能更优。建议根据患者的需求,使用该模型进行智能监测、高危患者分类和必要医疗资源的分配。然而,这些发现的临床价值需要在更大的数据集上进行检验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9184/9429694/fcb3a9ea27a7/12872_2022_2825_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9184/9429694/1bbc6857324b/12872_2022_2825_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9184/9429694/8b3a6f632a94/12872_2022_2825_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9184/9429694/fcb3a9ea27a7/12872_2022_2825_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9184/9429694/1bbc6857324b/12872_2022_2825_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9184/9429694/8b3a6f632a94/12872_2022_2825_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9184/9429694/fcb3a9ea27a7/12872_2022_2825_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Intelligent prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE) following percutaneous coronary intervention using ANFIS-PSO model.基于 ANFIS-PSO 模型的经皮冠状动脉介入术后主要不良心血管事件(MACCE)的智能预测。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02825-0.
2
Risk factors associated with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a 10-year follow-up comparing random survival forest and Cox proportional-hazards model.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要不良心脑血管事件的相关危险因素:一项比较随机生存森林模型和Cox比例风险模型的10年随访研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01834-1.
3
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with reduced ejection fraction.射血分数降低的患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;161(3):1022-1031.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.159. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
4
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
5
Three-year clinical outcome of unprotected left main coronary artery disease patients complicated with chronic kidney disease treated by coronary artery bypass graft versus percutaneous coronary intervention.未经保护的左主干冠状动脉疾病合并慢性肾脏病患者经冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 3 年临床结果。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Feb;190(1):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02257-9. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
6
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
7
Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery).三维分叉角度对左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 5 年预后的影响:SYNTAX 试验(紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏搭桥术的联合治疗)的一项亚组研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.009.
8
Multiarterial grafts improve the rate of early major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing coronary revascularization: analysis of 12 615 patients with multivessel disease.多动脉旁路移植可改善多支血管病变患者冠状动脉血运重建术后早期主要心脏和脑血管不良事件的发生率:12615 例患者分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;52(4):746-752. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx171.
9
Predictive value of ACEF II score in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease undergoing one-stop hybrid coronary revascularization.ACEF II 评分在一站式杂交冠状动脉血运重建治疗多支血管病变患者中的预测价值。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Oct 10;21(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02299-6.
10
Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial.糖尿病患者复杂冠状动脉疾病的治疗:SYNTAX 试验比较旁路手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt017. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined prediction value of coronary plaque burden, serum creatinine, MLR and NLR in reinfarction risk after PCI in middle-aged and elderly patients with myocardial infarction.心肌梗死中老年患者PCI术后再梗死风险中冠状动脉斑块负荷、血清肌酐、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值及中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的联合预测价值
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jun 24;30(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02804-z.
2
Comparison of machine learning models with conventional statistical methods for prediction of percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的机器学习模型与传统统计方法的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04746-0.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of Left Main Revascularization after Percutaneous Intervention or Bypass Surgery.经皮介入治疗或旁路手术后左主干血运重建的结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Apr 12;2022:6496777. doi: 10.1155/2022/6496777. eCollection 2022.
2
Risk Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Occurrence Within 6 Months After Coronary Revascularization: Machine Learning Study.冠状动脉血运重建后6个月内主要不良心血管事件发生的风险预测:机器学习研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Apr 20;10(4):e33395. doi: 10.2196/33395.
3
In-hospital and 1-Year Outcomes of Repeated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-stent Restenosis With Acute Coronary Syndrome Presentation.
Predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要心脑血管不良事件的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04896-4.
4
Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu decoction improves hemorheology and inhibits inflammatory response after PCI for acute myocardial infarction.黄芪桂枝五物汤改善急性心肌梗死后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的血液流变学并抑制炎症反应。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 May 15;15(5):3686-3696. eCollection 2023.
急性冠脉综合征患者支架内再狭窄行重复经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的院内及 1 年结局。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2022 Jun 1;21(2):87-92. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000283. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
4
Modeling the diagnosis of coronary artery disease by discriminant analysis and logistic regression: a cross-sectional study.采用判别分析和逻辑回归对冠心病进行诊断建模:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01823-8.
5
Comparing clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention in real world practice in Iranian population.在伊朗人群的现实临床实践中,比较接受冠状动脉搭桥术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者的临床结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02521-z.
6
Artificial Intelligence to Improve Risk Prediction with Nuclear Cardiac Studies.人工智能提升核素心肌灌注显像风险预测能力。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Apr;24(4):307-316. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01649-w. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
Real-World Treatment Selection Factors and 7-Year Clinical Outcomes between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Left Main Disease.左主干病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的真实世界治疗选择因素及7年临床结局
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 19;11(3):503. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030503.
8
Five-year outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with complex coronary artery disease.患有复杂冠状动脉疾病的八旬老人冠状动脉搭桥术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的五年结局
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 May;70(5):419-429. doi: 10.1007/s11748-021-01711-4. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
9
Risk factors associated with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a 10-year follow-up comparing random survival forest and Cox proportional-hazards model.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要不良心脑血管事件的相关危险因素:一项比较随机生存森林模型和Cox比例风险模型的10年随访研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01834-1.
10
Improved adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based on modified glowworm swarm and differential evolution optimization algorithm for medical diagnosis.基于改进萤火虫群和差分进化优化算法的改进自适应神经模糊推理系统用于医学诊断
Neural Comput Appl. 2021;33(13):7649-7660. doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-05507-0. Epub 2020 Nov 24.