• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多阶段供应商评估的概率方法:序数优先法中的置信水平测量

Probabilistic Approach to Multi-Stage Supplier Evaluation: Confidence Level Measurement in Ordinal Priority Approach.

作者信息

Mahmoudi Amin, Javed Saad Ahmed

机构信息

Department of Construction and Real Estate, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096 China.

School of Business, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044 China.

出版信息

Group Decis Negot. 2022;31(5):1051-1096. doi: 10.1007/s10726-022-09790-1. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10726-022-09790-1
PMID:36042813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9409630/
Abstract

A popular framework of the supplier selection process is usually characterized by problem definition, criteria formulation, supplier screening, and supplier selection. The literature review suggested limitations of this framework as it ignores the screening of criteria (beyond criteria weighing) and evaluators (buyers) and its inability to guide the supplier selection problems where a measure of confidence or trust is needed to confirm the reliability of the selected supplier. While extending de Boer's influential supplier selection framework, the current study argues that the supplier selection problem is not merely about ranking suppliers based on given criteria; instead, it involves evaluating criteria and evaluators as well. Guided by the theory of statistics and the Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA), the study pioneers a probabilistic approach of supplier evaluation and selection under incomplete information using a novel Confidence Level measure. The study suggests, the probability that a supplier shortlisted for selection is actually the optimum choice or not can be explained through a probability distribution, called W-distribution, therefore, confidently preventing the decision-makers from selecting the sub-optimum suppliers. The study presents a novel contribution to the theory of multiple-attribute decision-making through the OPA. The proposed approach can help build intelligent decision support systems to aid managers while providing them with early warning tools and suggestions to improve confidence in their selection.

摘要

供应商选择过程的一个流行框架通常具有问题定义、标准制定、供应商筛选和供应商选择等特点。文献综述表明了该框架的局限性,因为它忽略了标准(除标准权重外)和评估者(采购方)的筛选,并且无法指导在需要某种置信度或信任度来确认所选供应商可靠性的情况下的供应商选择问题。在扩展德布尔有影响力的供应商选择框架时,当前研究认为供应商选择问题不仅仅是根据给定标准对供应商进行排名;相反,它还涉及对标准和评估者的评估。在统计学理论和序数优先法(OPA)的指导下,该研究开创了一种在信息不完整情况下使用新颖的置信水平度量进行供应商评估和选择的概率方法。该研究表明,入围选择的供应商实际上是否为最佳选择的概率可以通过一种称为W分布的概率分布来解释,因此,可以自信地防止决策者选择次优供应商。该研究通过OPA对多属性决策理论做出了新颖贡献。所提出的方法可以帮助构建智能决策支持系统,以协助管理人员,同时为他们提供预警工具和建议,以提高他们选择的置信度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/842b22478dc8/10726_2022_9790_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/835fc2011b3c/10726_2022_9790_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/5c43f5e17e10/10726_2022_9790_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/9cfbb79361d8/10726_2022_9790_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/d0dc7e6c20a7/10726_2022_9790_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/00afd70d3af5/10726_2022_9790_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/3831b04697c1/10726_2022_9790_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/1266a69878c9/10726_2022_9790_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/32d717d7ff2a/10726_2022_9790_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/9392d3f2330b/10726_2022_9790_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/48b72462d375/10726_2022_9790_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/e95585f9fbc0/10726_2022_9790_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/d16f3113d761/10726_2022_9790_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/6e665f8968dc/10726_2022_9790_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/8e8a493afe31/10726_2022_9790_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/842b22478dc8/10726_2022_9790_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/835fc2011b3c/10726_2022_9790_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/5c43f5e17e10/10726_2022_9790_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/9cfbb79361d8/10726_2022_9790_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/d0dc7e6c20a7/10726_2022_9790_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/00afd70d3af5/10726_2022_9790_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/3831b04697c1/10726_2022_9790_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/1266a69878c9/10726_2022_9790_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/32d717d7ff2a/10726_2022_9790_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/9392d3f2330b/10726_2022_9790_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/48b72462d375/10726_2022_9790_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/e95585f9fbc0/10726_2022_9790_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/d16f3113d761/10726_2022_9790_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/6e665f8968dc/10726_2022_9790_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/8e8a493afe31/10726_2022_9790_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a4/9409630/842b22478dc8/10726_2022_9790_Fig15_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Probabilistic Approach to Multi-Stage Supplier Evaluation: Confidence Level Measurement in Ordinal Priority Approach.多阶段供应商评估的概率方法:序数优先法中的置信水平测量
Group Decis Negot. 2022;31(5):1051-1096. doi: 10.1007/s10726-022-09790-1. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
2
Clustering sustainable suppliers in the plastics industry: A fuzzy equivalence relation approach.聚类可持续供应商在塑料行业:模糊等价关系方法。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118811. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118811. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
3
Multicriteria Decision Making in Supply Chain Management Using FMEA and Hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE Algorithms.使用 FMEA 和混合层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法的供应链管理中的多准则决策
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;23(8):4041. doi: 10.3390/s23084041.
4
Green supplier selection for textile industry: a case study using BWM-TODIM integration under interval type-2 fuzzy sets.基于区间型 2 模糊集的 BWM-TODIM 集成方法在纺织业绿色供应商选择中的应用:案例研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(45):64793-64817. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13832-7. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
5
Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Hospital.综合多准则决策方法解决供应商选择问题:医院案例研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Oct 10;2019:5614892. doi: 10.1155/2019/5614892. eCollection 2019.
6
A supplier selection model in pharmaceutical supply chain using PCA, Z-TOPSIS and MILP: A case study.基于 PCA、Z-TOPSIS 和 MILP 的制药供应链供应商选择模型:案例研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 15;13(8):e0201604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201604. eCollection 2018.
7
Supplier selection in healthcare supply chain management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy rough decision-making approach.新冠疫情期间医疗供应链管理中的供应商选择:一种新型模糊粗糙决策方法
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Jan 12:1-43. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04529-2.
8
An optimized multi-attribute decision-making approach to construction supply chain management by using complex picture fuzzy soft set.一种基于复杂图像模糊软集的建筑供应链管理优化多属性决策方法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Aug 30;9:e1540. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1540. eCollection 2023.
9
Performance measurement for green supplier selection based on data envelopment analysis.基于数据包络分析的绿色供应商选择绩效评价。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(30):45960-45970. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17897-2. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
10
A methodology for supplier selection under the curse of dimensionality problem based on fuzzy quality function deployment and interval data envelopment analysis.基于模糊质量功能部署和区间数据包络分析的维度诅咒下供应商选择方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0253917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253917. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) for performance measurement of healthcare construction projects: Ordinal Priority Approach.医疗建设项目绩效评估的大规模群体决策(LSGDM):序数优先法
Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022;52(12):13781-13802. doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-04094-y. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
A novel project portfolio selection framework towards organizational resilience: Robust Ordinal Priority Approach.一种面向组织韧性的新型项目组合选择框架:稳健序贯优先方法。
Expert Syst Appl. 2022 Feb;188:116067. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116067. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
2
New extension of ordinal priority approach for multiple attribute decision-making problems: design and analysis.多属性决策问题中序数优先方法的新扩展:设计与分析
Complex Intell Systems. 2022;8(6):4955-4970. doi: 10.1007/s40747-022-00721-w. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
Performance Evaluation of Construction Sub-contractors using Ordinal Priority Approach.
使用序数优先法对建筑分包商进行绩效评估。
Eval Program Plann. 2022 Apr;91:102022. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102022. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Adopting distributed ledger technology for the sustainable construction industry: evaluating the barriers using Ordinal Priority Approach.采用分布式账本技术推动可持续建筑行业发展:运用序数优先法评估障碍。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(7):10495-10520. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16376-y. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
5
Now is the time to press the reset button: Helping India's companies to become more resilient and effective in overcoming the impacts of COVID-19, climate changes and other crises.现在是按下重置按钮的时候了:帮助印度企业在克服新冠疫情、气候变化和其他危机的影响方面更具韧性和成效。
J Clean Prod. 2021 Jan 20;280:124466. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124466. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
Sustainable circular supplier selection: A novel hybrid approach.可持续循环供应商选择:一种新的混合方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 20;722:137936. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137936. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
7
Supplier selection based on a neural network model using genetic algorithm.基于遗传算法的神经网络模型的供应商选择
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2009 Sep;20(9):1504-19. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2009.2027321. Epub 2009 Aug 18.