• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用自动区域设计来开发癌症报告的地理区域。

Developing Geographic Areas for Cancer Reporting Using Automated Zone Design.

作者信息

Tatalovich Zaria, Stinchcomb David G, Ng Diane, Yu Mandi, Lewis Denise R, Zhu Li, Feuer Eric J Rocky

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 19;191(12):2109-2119. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac155.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwac155
PMID:36043397
Abstract

The reporting and analysis of population-based cancer statistics in the United States has traditionally been done for counties. However, counties are not ideal for analysis of cancer rates, due to wide variation in population size, with larger counties having considerable sociodemographic variation within their borders and sparsely populated counties having less reliable estimates of cancer rates that are often suppressed due to confidentiality concerns. There is a need and an opportunity to utilize zone design procedures in the context of cancer surveillance to generate coherent, statistically stable geographic units that are more optimal for cancer reporting and analysis than counties. To achieve this goal, we sought to create areas within each US state that are: 1) similar in population size and large enough to minimize rate suppression; 2) sociodemographically homogeneous; 3) compact; and 4) custom crafted to represent areas that are meaningful to cancer registries and stakeholders. The resulting geographic units reveal the heterogeneity of rates that are hidden when reported at the county-level while substantially reducing the need to suppress data. We believe this effort will facilitate more meaningful comparative analysis of cancer rates for small geographic areas and will advance the understanding of cancer burden in the United States.

摘要

在美国,基于人群的癌症统计数据的报告和分析传统上是针对县进行的。然而,县并不适合用于癌症发病率分析,这是因为人口规模差异很大,较大的县境内存在相当大的社会人口统计学差异,而人口稀少的县对癌症发病率的估计往往不太可靠,这些估计常常因保密问题而被压制。在癌症监测的背景下,有必要且有机会利用区域设计程序来生成连贯、统计稳定的地理单元,这些单元比县更适合用于癌症报告和分析。为实现这一目标,我们试图在美国每个州内创建这样的区域:1)人口规模相似且足够大,以尽量减少发病率压制;2)社会人口统计学上同质;3)紧凑;4)经过定制,以代表对癌症登记处和利益相关者有意义的区域。由此产生的地理单元揭示了在县级报告时隐藏的发病率异质性,同时大幅减少了压制数据的必要性。我们相信,这项工作将有助于对小地理区域的癌症发病率进行更有意义的比较分析,并将推动对美国癌症负担的理解。

相似文献

1
Developing Geographic Areas for Cancer Reporting Using Automated Zone Design.使用自动区域设计来开发癌症报告的地理区域。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 19;191(12):2109-2119. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac155.
2
Development of Sub-County Cancer Reporting Zones in Delaware and Example Use Case for Targeted Interventions.特拉华州县级以下癌症报告区的发展及针对性干预的示例用例。
Dela J Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;10(3):26-29. doi: 10.32481/djph.2024.08.08. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Geostatistical analysis of disease data: accounting for spatial support and population density in the isopleth mapping of cancer mortality risk using area-to-point Poisson kriging.疾病数据的地统计分析:在使用面积到点的泊松克里金法绘制癌症死亡风险等值线图时考虑空间支持和人口密度。
Int J Health Geogr. 2006 Nov 30;5:52. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-5-52.
4
Invasive Cancer Incidence, 2004-2013, and Deaths, 2006-2015, in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Counties - United States.2004 - 2013年美国非都市和都市县的侵袭性癌症发病率以及2006 - 2015年的死亡情况
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Jul 7;66(14):1-13. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6614a1.
5
Geographic disparities of cardiovascular and cancer mortality in the USA: 1981-2019.美国心血管疾病和癌症死亡率的地域差异:1981-2019 年。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):799-803. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad089.
6
Potentially Excess Deaths from the Five Leading Causes of Death in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Counties - United States, 2010-2017.大都市和县和非大都市县五个主要死因的潜在超额死亡人数-美国,2010-2017 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Nov 8;68(10):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6810a1.
7
The geographic distribution of measles in the United States, 1980 through 1989.1980年至1989年美国麻疹的地理分布情况。
JAMA. 1992 Apr 8;267(14):1936-41.
8
The association between breast cancer capacity and resources with incidence and mortality in Arizona's low populous counties.亚利桑那州人口较少的县的乳腺癌能力和资源与发病率和死亡率之间的关系。
Rural Remote Health. 2021 Jul;21(3):6357. doi: 10.22605/RRH6357. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
9
Surveillance for certain health behaviors among states and selected local areas--behavioral risk factor surveillance system, United States, 2004.美国2004年各州及部分地方地区特定健康行为监测——行为危险因素监测系统
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 Jul 14;55(7):1-124.
10
A look at the gynecologic oncologist workforce - Are we meeting patient demand?妇科肿瘤学家劳动力队伍考察 - 我们是否满足患者需求?
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Nov;163(2):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer incidence data at the ZIP Code Tabulation Area level in the United States interpolated by Monte Carlo simulation with multiple constraints.美国邮政编码分区层面的癌症发病率数据,通过具有多重约束的蒙特卡洛模拟进行插值。
Sci Data. 2025 May 30;12(1):909. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05254-8.
2
Enhancing Catchment Area Tools: A De-Identification Method for Integrating Clinical Trial Data with Cancer InFocus.增强集水区工具:一种将临床试验数据与癌症聚焦信息整合的去识别方法。
Prev Oncol Epidemiol. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.1080/28322134.2024.2388564. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
3
Development of Sub-County Cancer Reporting Zones in Delaware and Example Use Case for Targeted Interventions.
特拉华州县级以下癌症报告区的发展及针对性干预的示例用例。
Dela J Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;10(3):26-29. doi: 10.32481/djph.2024.08.08. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Interinstitutional Approach to Advancing Geospatial Technologies for US Cancer Centers.美国癌症中心推进地理空间技术的机构间方法。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Aug;8:e2400099. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00099.
5
Biological Basis of Breast Cancer-Related Disparities in Precision Oncology Era.精准肿瘤学时代乳腺癌相关差异的生物学基础。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Apr 8;25(7):4113. doi: 10.3390/ijms25074113.
6
Capturing emergency dispatch address points as geocoding candidates to quantify delimited confidence in residential geolocation.将紧急调度地址点捕获为地理编码候选点,以量化住宅地理位置的有限置信度。
Int J Health Geogr. 2023 Sep 26;22(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12942-023-00347-2.
7
Feasibility of visualizing cancer incidence data at sub-county level: Findings from 21 National Program of Cancer Registries.以县级为单位可视化癌症发病数据的可行性:来自 21 个全国癌症登记项目的结果。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;45:100564. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2023.100564. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
8
Disparities in cancer incidence by rurality in California.加利福尼亚农村地区癌症发病率的差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Apr 11;115(4):385-393. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac238.