Schlüter M, Kunze K P, Kuck K H
Z Kardiol. 1987 Apr;76(4):217-22.
To assess the validity of train stimulation for the prevention of accessory pathway mediated atrioventricular tachycardia, thirteen patients were studied. Tachycardia was induced from high right atrium and coronary sinus by means of single extrastimuli; preventive stimulation at high right atrium and coronary sinus consisted of the delivery of a train of ten or eleven stimuli 10 ms apart, following the tachycardia initiating stimulus. Preventive train stimulation at the site of tachycardia induction was successful in all patients when the train exceeded the atrial effective refractory period of the initiating stimulus to achieve single atrial capture within the "preventive zone". In patients with a left-sided accessory pathway in whom tachycardia was induced from the coronary sinus, preventive stimulation at high right atrium failed because of interatrial conduction delay. It is concluded that train stimulation is an effective mode of prevention of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, yet preventive stimulation should be performed as close as possible to the reentry circuit to reduce interatrial conduction delay.
为评估串刺激预防房室旁道介导的房室性心动过速的有效性,对13例患者进行了研究。通过单个期外刺激从高位右心房和冠状窦诱发心动过速;高位右心房和冠状窦的预防性刺激包括在心动过速起始刺激后,发放一串10个或11个刺激,刺激间期为10毫秒。当串刺激超过起始刺激的心房有效不应期,在“预防区”内实现单次心房夺获时,在心动过速诱发部位进行预防性串刺激在所有患者中均成功。在从冠状窦诱发心动过速的左侧旁道患者中,由于房间传导延迟,高位右心房的预防性刺激失败。结论是,串刺激是预防房室折返性心动过速的有效方式,但预防性刺激应尽可能靠近折返环路进行,以减少房间传导延迟。