Suppr超能文献

比较序贯器官衰竭评估评分和心脏手术评分系统对急诊急性主动脉夹层手术后死亡率的预测。

Comparison of sequential organ failure assessment score and cardiac surgery score systems for mortality prediction after emergency acute aortic dissection surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Kartal Koşuyolu High Speciality Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Türkiye.

Department of Cardiology, Kartal Koşuyolu High Speciality Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Türkiye.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Sep;28(9):1298-1304. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.27845.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is one of the most mortal cardiovascular diseases and requires urgent diagnosis and surgery. The patient's clinical findings, complications, and patient's history are closely related to mortality rates. Cardiac surgery score (CASUS) is a scoring system which is calculated by considering the special pathophysiological conditions of patients undergoing cardiac surgery and predicts post-operative results with high accuracy.

METHODS

Following the ethical approval from institutional ethics committee (ID: 2021/7/496), the data of consecutive 50 ATAAD patients who underwent emergent surgery in our hospital between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, were evaluated. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and CASUS scores were calculated using the worst values of the daily laboratory and neurological status for both in admission to emergency department and during intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up period. The average and the total values of these scores were recorded for pre-operative, post-operative 1st day, and for the categorical data were defined as frequency and percentage. We used the Mann-Whitney U test for the independent continuous data comparisons and Pearson Chi-Square or Fisher exact test for categorical data comparison whole ICU period. Continuous data were presented as median and interquartile ranges (25-75th).

RESULTS

The study comprised 50 patients, the rate of death was 34% (n=17). In total group, there were hypertension 72% (n=36), diabetes mellitus 24% (n=12), initial hemoglobin 12.5 g/dL (10.7-14.1, 25-75th), creatinine 1.09 mg/dL (0.85-1.33, 25-75th), and 72% (n=36) of these patients were male. The CASUSmean and SOFAmean scores were higher in the death-group when compared with the group who survived (12.9 [9.5-13.8, 25-75th], 3 [2-5, 25-75th]; 8 [6.1-9.2, 25-75th], 2.6 (2-4.5, 25-75th], p<0.001, respectively]. CASUSmean was independently associated with the 1-month mortality in model 1 (HR 1.25 [1.14-1.37] (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

According to our results increase in CASUS mean was the main predictor of 1 month mortality. When CASUS mean exceeds 8.3 the patient should be followed up more carefully for major adverse events including death.

摘要

背景

急性 A 型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)是最致命的心血管疾病之一,需要紧急诊断和手术。患者的临床发现、并发症和病史与死亡率密切相关。心脏手术评分(CASUS)是一种评分系统,通过考虑接受心脏手术患者的特殊病理生理状况来计算,能够非常准确地预测术后结果。

方法

在获得机构伦理委员会的伦理批准(ID:2021/7/496)后,我们评估了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在我院接受紧急手术的连续 50 例 ATAAD 患者的数据。在急诊科入院和重症监护病房(ICU)随访期间,使用每日实验室和神经状态的最差值计算序贯器官衰竭评估和 CASUS 评分。记录这些评分的平均值和总和,用于术前、术后第 1 天,并将分类数据定义为频率和百分比。我们使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行独立的连续数据比较,使用 Pearson Chi-Square 或 Fisher 精确检验进行整个 ICU 期间的分类数据比较。连续数据以中位数和四分位距(25-75 分位)表示。

结果

该研究包括 50 例患者,死亡率为 34%(n=17)。在总组中,高血压占 72%(n=36),糖尿病占 24%(n=12),初始血红蛋白为 12.5g/dL(10.7-14.1,25-75 分位),肌酐为 1.09mg/dL(0.85-1.33,25-75 分位),72%(n=36)的患者为男性。与存活组相比,死亡组的 CASUS 平均评分和 SOFA 平均评分更高(12.9[9.5-13.8,25-75 分位],3[2-5,25-75 分位];8[6.1-9.2,25-75 分位],2.6(2-4.5,25-75 分位],p<0.001)。在模型 1 中,CASUS 平均评分与 1 个月死亡率独立相关(HR 1.25[1.14-1.37](p<0.001)。

结论

根据我们的结果,CASUS 平均评分的增加是 1 个月死亡率的主要预测因素。当 CASUS 平均值超过 8.3 时,应更密切地监测患者是否发生包括死亡在内的重大不良事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c7/10315962/ef82b6fc15b0/TJTES-28-1298-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验