• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国在 COVID-19 大流行期间增加了精神病院的强制性措施。

Increase in coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Centers for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg, Ravensburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 31;17(8):e0264046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264046. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0264046
PMID:36044407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9432719/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the pandemic in 2020 caused changes in psychiatric hospital cases, the percentage of patients exposed to coercive interventions, and aggressive incidents.

METHODS

We used the case registry for coercive measures of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg, comprising case-related data on mechanical restraint, seclusion, physical restraint, and forced medication in each of the State's 31 licensed hospitals treating adults, to compare data from 2019 and 2020.

RESULTS

The number of cases in adult psychiatry decreased by 7.6% from 105,782 to 97,761. The percentage of involuntary cases increased from 12.3 to 14.1%, and the absolute number of coercive measures increased by 4.7% from 26,269 to 27,514. The percentage of cases exposed to any kind of coercive measure increased by 24.6% from 6.5 to 8.1%, and the median cumulative duration per affected case increased by 13.1% from 12.2 to 13.8 hrs, where seclusion increased more than mechanical restraint. The percentage of patients with aggressive incidents, collected in 10 hospitals, remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

While voluntary cases decreased considerably during the pandemic, involuntary cases increased slightly. However, the increased percentage of patients exposed to coercion is not only due to a decreased percentage of voluntary patients, as the duration of coercive measures per case also increased. The changes that indicate deterioration in treatment quality were probably caused by the multitude of measures to manage the pandemic. The focus of attention and internal rules as well have shifted from prevention of coercion to prevention of infection.

摘要

目的

探讨 2020 年大流行是否导致精神病院病例、接受强制性干预的患者比例和攻击事件发生变化。

方法

我们使用巴登-符腾堡州的强制性措施病例登记册,该登记册包含了该州 31 家成人精神病治疗许可医院中每例机械约束、隔离、身体约束和强制用药的与病例相关数据,以比较 2019 年和 2020 年的数据。

结果

成人精神病学的病例数从 105782 例降至 97761 例,下降了 7.6%。非自愿病例的比例从 12.3%上升到 14.1%,强制性措施的绝对数量从 26269 例增加到 27514 例,增加了 4.7%。暴露于任何类型强制性措施的病例比例从 6.5%上升到 8.1%,增加了 24.6%,每个受影响病例的累积持续时间中位数增加了 13.1%,从 12.2 小时增加到 13.8 小时,其中隔离的增加超过了机械约束。在 10 家医院收集的攻击事件患者比例保持不变。

结论

虽然大流行期间自愿病例数量大幅下降,但非自愿病例略有增加。然而,暴露于强制性措施的患者比例增加不仅是由于自愿患者比例下降,因为每个病例的强制性措施持续时间也增加了。表明治疗质量恶化的变化可能是由于多种大流行管理措施造成的。关注的重点和内部规则也从预防强制转变为预防感染。

相似文献

1
Increase in coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic.德国在 COVID-19 大流行期间增加了精神病院的强制性措施。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 31;17(8):e0264046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264046. eCollection 2022.
2
[Effects of the Decision of the German Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint in 2018 : Coercive measures in the psychiatric hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg in 2019 compared to the years 2015-2017].[德国宪法法院2018年裁决对机械约束的影响:2019年巴登-符腾堡州精神病院的强制措施与2015 - 2017年的比较]
Nervenarzt. 2022 Jul;93(7):706-712. doi: 10.1007/s00115-022-01267-5. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
3
Reduction of coercive measures under routine conditions in psychiatric hospitals 2004-2019: Strong effects in old age psychiatry, much less in general psychiatry.2004-2019 年常规情况下精神病院强制性措施的减少:老年精神病学影响较大,一般精神病学影响较小。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 20;63(1):e102. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.104.
4
[The Case Register for Coercive Measures According to the Law on Assistance for Persons with Mental Diseases of Baden-Wuerttemberg: Conception and First Evaluation].[巴登-符腾堡州《精神疾病患者救助法》强制医疗措施病例登记册:构想与首次评估]
Psychiatr Prax. 2019 Mar;46(2):82-89. doi: 10.1055/a-0665-6728. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
5
Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.法医精神病学中的自由限制与强制手段
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 5;11:146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00146. eCollection 2020.
6
Effect of the introduction of immediate judge's decisions in 2018 on the use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany: a population-based study.2018年引入即时法官裁决对德国精神病院强制手段使用的影响:一项基于人群的研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Nov 4;11:100233. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100233. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
[Recording and reducing coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals].[精神病院强制措施的记录与减少]
Psychiatr Prax. 2004 Nov;31 Suppl 1:S18-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828420.
8
Association Between Restriction of Involuntary Medication and Frequency of Coercive Measures and Violent Incidents.非自愿用药限制与强制措施及暴力事件发生频率之间的关联
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Dec 1;67(12):1315-1320. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500476. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
9
Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.监测强制性措施使用情况的方法学问题。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Nov-Dec;34(6):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
10
[Impact of the Temporaneous Lack of Legal Basis for Involuntary Treatment on the Frequency of Aggressive Incidents, Seclusion and Restraint among Patients with Chronic Schizophrenic Disorders].[慢性精神分裂症患者非自愿治疗临时缺乏法律依据对攻击事件、隔离和约束频率的影响]
Psychiatr Prax. 2015 Jul;42(5):260-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1370069. Epub 2014 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Surveying Child and Adolescent Inpatient Psychiatric Units: Demographics, Policies, and Practice.儿童和青少年住院精神科病房调查:人口统计学、政策与实践
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2024.2426178.
2
Factors associated with seclusion and restraint on admission to forensic psychiatric hospitals: A 10-year retrospective study.法医精神病医院入院时与隔离和约束相关的因素:一项10年回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0328164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328164. eCollection 2025.
3
Drug utilization in geriatric psychiatric patients in the emergency department-a cohort study under real-world conditions.急诊科老年精神病患者的药物使用——一项真实世界条件下的队列研究
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2025 May 16;15:20451253251339373. doi: 10.1177/20451253251339373. eCollection 2025.
4
Mechanical restraint in inpatient psychiatric settings: A systematic review of international prevalence, associations, outcomes, and reduction strategies.住院精神科环境中的机械约束:国际患病率、关联因素、结局及减少策略的系统评价
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25;68(1):e57. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2453.
5
[The current legal practice of judicial review of restraints].[当前对限制措施进行司法审查的法律实践]
Nervenarzt. 2025 Sep;96(5):496-499. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01779-2. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
6
Seclusion and mechanical restraint in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: an increased use in mental health settings.2019冠状病毒病大流行后隔离与机械约束措施:在精神卫生环境中的使用增加
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 4;15:1428599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1428599. eCollection 2024.
7
[Mental healthcare in South Tyrol].[南蒂罗尔的精神卫生保健]
Nervenarzt. 2025 Jul;96(4):355-361. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01755-w. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
8
Variations in definitions used for describing restrictive care practices (seclusion and restraint) in adult mental health inpatient units: a systematic review and content analysis.成人精神科住院病房中用于描述限制性护理措施(隔离和约束)的定义差异:一项系统评价和内容分析
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;60(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02739-6. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
9
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of restraint and seclusion interventions in Ontario emergency departments: A population-based study.新冠疫情对安大略省急诊部门约束和隔离干预措施使用的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0302164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302164. eCollection 2024.
10
Impact of COVID-19-Related Social Distancing on the Incidence of Inpatient Aggression at a Public Psychiatric Hospital.新型冠状病毒肺炎相关社交距离措施对一家公立精神病医院住院患者攻击行为发生率的影响
Cureus. 2023 Nov 26;15(11):e49440. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49440. eCollection 2023 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
"Our Patients Are Different": Predictors of Seclusion and Restraint in 31 Psychiatric Hospitals.“我们的患者与众不同”:31家精神病医院中隔离与约束措施的预测因素
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 26;13:791333. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.791333. eCollection 2022.
2
Effect of the introduction of immediate judge's decisions in 2018 on the use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany: a population-based study.2018年引入即时法官裁决对德国精神病院强制手段使用的影响:一项基于人群的研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Nov 4;11:100233. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100233. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on involuntary and urgent inpatient admissions for psychiatric disorders in a German-wide hospital network.COVID-19 大流行对德国范围内医院网络中精神障碍非自愿和紧急住院治疗的影响。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Oct;142:140-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.052. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
4
Utilization of Inpatient Mental Health Care in the Rhineland During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间莱茵兰地区住院精神卫生保健的利用情况。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 30;9:593307. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.593307. eCollection 2021.
5
[Changes in the Practice of Involuntary Hospitalization During the COVID-19 Pandemic - Experiences and Opinions of Chief Psychiatrists].[新冠疫情期间非自愿住院治疗的实践变化——首席精神科医生的经验与观点]
Psychiatr Prax. 2022 May;49(4):180-187. doi: 10.1055/a-1406-7265. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
6
Emergency hospital admissions for psychiatric disorders in a German-wide hospital network during the COVID-19 outbreak.在新冠疫情期间,德国范围内医院网络中因精神疾病而进行的急诊入院情况。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;56(8):1469-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02091-z. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
7
[Implementation and evaluation of a telephone hotline for professional mental health first aid during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany].[德国新冠疫情期间专业心理健康急救电话热线的实施与评估]
Nervenarzt. 2022 Jan;93(1):24-33. doi: 10.1007/s00115-021-01089-x. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
8
Silver linings: Observed reductions in aggression and use of restraints and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient care during COVID-19.一线希望:在 COVID-19 期间,精神科住院患者的攻击行为以及约束和隔离的使用观察到减少。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Apr;29(2):381-385. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12752. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
9
Incidents of aggression in German psychiatric hospitals: Is there an increase?德国精神病院的攻击事件:是否有所增加?
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 5;16(1):e0245090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245090. eCollection 2021.
10
Reduction of coercive measures under routine conditions in psychiatric hospitals 2004-2019: Strong effects in old age psychiatry, much less in general psychiatry.2004-2019 年常规情况下精神病院强制性措施的减少:老年精神病学影响较大,一般精神病学影响较小。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 20;63(1):e102. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.104.