Muluneh Zelalem Belayneh, Chavulak Jacinta, Lee Den-Ching A, Petrakis Melissa, Haines Terry P
School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
College of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, Dilla University, Dila, Ethiopia.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;60(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02739-6. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
The main purpose of this review was to (1) identify thematic elements within definitions used by recently published literature to describe the constructs of physical/mechanical restraint, seclusion and chemical restraint in adult mental health inpatient units.
We conducted a comprehensive literature search of six databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL-Plus). In this review, we conducted content analysis to synthesize evidence to understand and compare the commonalities and discrepancies in conceptual elements that were incorporated within the definitions of different forms of restrictive care practices.
A total of 95 studies that provided definitions for different forms of restrictive care practices [physical/mechanical restraint (n = 72), seclusion (n = 65) and chemical restraint (n = 19)] were included in this review. Significant variations existed in the conceptual domains presented within the applied definitions of physical/mechanical restraint, seclusion, and chemical restraint. Conceptual themes identified in this review were methods of restrictive care practice, reasons and desired outcomes, the extent of patient restriction during restrictive care practice episodes, timing (duration, frequency, and time of the day), the level of patient autonomy, and the personnel implementing these practices.
Inconsistencies in the terminologies and conceptual boundaries used to describe the constructs of different forms of restrictive care practices underscore the need to move forward in endorsing consensus definitions that reflect the diverse perspectives, ensuring clarity and consistency in practice and research. This will assist in validly measuring and comparing the actual trends of restrictive care practice use across different healthcare institutions and jurisdictions.
本综述的主要目的是:(1)在近期发表的文献所使用的定义中,识别用于描述成人心理健康住院单元中身体/机械约束、隔离和化学约束概念的主题元素。
我们对六个数据库(Scopus、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Embase和CINAHL-Plus)进行了全面的文献检索。在本综述中,我们进行了内容分析,以综合证据,理解和比较不同形式的限制性护理实践定义中所包含的概念元素的共性和差异。
本综述共纳入95项为不同形式的限制性护理实践[身体/机械约束(n = 72)、隔离(n = 65)和化学约束(n = 19)]提供定义的研究。身体/机械约束、隔离和化学约束的应用定义中所呈现的概念领域存在显著差异。本综述中确定的概念主题包括限制性护理实践方法、原因和预期结果、限制性护理实践期间患者受限程度、时间(持续时间、频率和一天中的时间)、患者自主水平以及实施这些实践的人员。
用于描述不同形式的限制性护理实践概念的术语和概念边界不一致,这突出表明需要进一步认可反映不同观点的共识定义,以确保实践和研究的清晰性和一致性。这将有助于有效衡量和比较不同医疗机构和司法管辖区内限制性护理实践的实际使用趋势。