Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Theory Biosci. 2022 Nov;141(4):349-364. doi: 10.1007/s12064-022-00378-6. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
How did Chinese scientific intellectuals react to the dispute over evolutionary mechanisms during the period of the "eclipse of Darwinism"? This is my focal question. To answer it, I survey the attitudes of three groups of people toward the debate in the early decades of the twentieth century: Chinese paleontologists and their general embrace of the anti-Darwinian position, a group of non-specialists (or semi-specialists) and their assertion of a "revival of Lamarckism," and the American-trained Chinese biologists and their typical agnostic stance toward the antagonism between Darwinism and the mutation theory. Different concerns or motivations underlay these three different stances. There were also interesting attempts by biologists like Chen Zhen to exploit some recreational breeding traditions like goldfish breeding peculiar to China to participate in the dispute more directly.
中国科学知识分子在“达尔文主义的衰落”时期如何看待进化机制的争论?这是我的焦点问题。为了回答这个问题,我调查了 20 世纪早期三组人对这场争论的态度:中国古生物学家及其对反达尔文主义立场的普遍接受,一群非专业人士(或半专业人士)及其对“拉马克主义复兴”的断言,以及受美国训练的中国生物学家及其对达尔文主义与突变理论之间对立的典型不可知立场。这三种不同立场的背后是不同的关注点或动机。生物学家陈桢等也有趣地试图利用金鱼养殖等中国特有的一些娱乐性养殖传统,更直接地参与到这场争论中。