• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯胺酮、硫酸镁和丙泊酚在上消化道内镜检查患者中镇静效果的比较:双盲随机临床试验

Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Ketamine, Magnesium Sulfate, and Propofol in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Shafiee Hamed, Riahipour Farahnaz, Hormati Ahmad, Ahmadpour Sajjad, Habibi Mohammad Amin, Vahedian Mostafa, Aminnejad Reza, Saeidi Mohammad

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.

MD, Associated Professor of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2023;22(8):1259-1266. doi: 10.2174/1871527321666220831093652.

DOI:10.2174/1871527321666220831093652
PMID:36045520
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopy provides valuable diagnostic information and intervention therapies for gastroenterologists. Therefore, various drugs have been used to induce sedation in patients undergoing endoscopy, whereas none have been considered preferred by endoscopists. In the current study, we decided to use the combination of magnesium sulfate, ketamine, and their synergistic effects for creating partial analgesia to increase the satisfaction of endoscopists and patients.

METHODS

This study is a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial that investigates the sedative effect of ketamine, magnesium sulfate, and propofol in endoscopy. Patients were selected from individuals over 12 years old and with American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status I or II. The study was performed on 210 patients classified as ASA (I have no underlying disease) or II (with underlying controlled disease). The whole group was relieved of pain through sedation according to Ramsay criteria, satisfaction with the operation, duration, recovery, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, and decreased oxygen saturation were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were enrolled in our study, including 51 patients (midazolam and propofol), 55 patients (midazolam and ketamine), and 49 patients (midazolam and ketamine and magnesium). The results showed that preoperative heart rate, intraoperative systolic blood pressure, intraoperative diastolic blood pressure, postoperative heart rate, postoperative systolic blood pressure, and postoperative heart rate were significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The satisfaction of the endoscopic was achieved to a great extent, mainly in the group receiving midazolam and propofol and in the group receiving midazolam and ketamine. In most cases, the satisfaction of the endoscopic was acceptable, and the low satisfaction of the endoscopic was more in the group receiving midazolam. Ketamine and magnesium were observed. The two compounds midazolam-ketamine, and midazolam-propofol, have a more favorable effect than the combination of midazolam, ketamine, and magnesium.

摘要

背景

内镜检查为胃肠病学家提供了有价值的诊断信息和干预治疗方法。因此,多种药物已被用于在内镜检查患者中诱导镇静,但尚无一种被内镜医师视为首选。在本研究中,我们决定使用硫酸镁、氯胺酮及其协同作用来产生部分镇痛效果,以提高内镜医师和患者的满意度。

方法

本研究是一项双盲随机临床试验,旨在研究氯胺酮、硫酸镁和丙泊酚在内镜检查中的镇静效果。患者选自12岁以上且美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I或II级的个体。该研究对210例被分类为ASA(I级:无基础疾病)或II级(有基础疾病但病情得到控制)的患者进行。根据拉姆齐标准,通过镇静使整个组缓解疼痛,比较手术满意度、持续时间、恢复情况、恶心呕吐、低血压和氧饱和度降低情况。

结果

我们的研究共纳入155例患者,包括51例(咪达唑仑和丙泊酚)、55例(咪达唑仑和氯胺酮)和49例(咪达唑仑、氯胺酮和镁)。结果显示,术前心率、术中收缩压、术中舒张压、术后心率、术后收缩压和术后心率在各组之间存在显著差异。

结论

在内镜检查满意度方面在很大程度上得以实现,主要是在接受咪达唑仑和丙泊酚的组以及接受咪达唑仑和氯胺酮的组。在大多数情况下,内镜检查满意度是可以接受的,内镜检查满意度较低的情况更多出现在接受咪达唑仑的组中。观察到氯胺酮和镁。咪达唑仑 - 氯胺酮以及咪达唑仑 - 丙泊酚这两种组合比咪达唑仑、氯胺酮和镁的组合具有更有利的效果。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Ketamine, Magnesium Sulfate, and Propofol in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.氯胺酮、硫酸镁和丙泊酚在上消化道内镜检查患者中镇静效果的比较:双盲随机临床试验
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2023;22(8):1259-1266. doi: 10.2174/1871527321666220831093652.
2
Addition of low-dose ketamine to midazolam-fentanyl-propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.在咪达唑仑-芬太尼-丙泊酚镇静基础上联合小剂量氯胺酮用于结肠镜检查:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Jun;27(4):301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
3
Procedural Sedation for Pediatric Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Korea.韩国儿科上消化道内镜检查的程序性镇静。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 May 24;36(20):e136. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e136.
4
Propofol target-controlled infusion for sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comparison of propofol alone versus propofol-fentanyl-midazolam.丙泊酚靶控输注用于镇静胃肠内镜检查:丙泊酚单用与丙泊酚 - 芬太尼 - 咪达唑仑的比较
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 Nov;31(11):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
5
Comparison of dexmedetomidine-propofol and ketamine-propofol administration during sedation-guided upper gastrointestinal system endoscopy.在镇静引导下进行上消化道系统内镜检查期间右美托咪定-丙泊酚与氯胺酮-丙泊酚给药的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e23317. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023317.
6
A comparison of sedation with midazolam-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl during endoscopy in children: a randomized trial.儿童内镜检查期间咪达唑仑-氯胺酮与丙泊酚-芬太尼镇静效果的比较:一项随机试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;29(1):112-118. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000751.
7
Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Propofol-Fentanyl Versus Propofol-Ketamine During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中丙泊酚-芬太尼与丙泊酚-氯胺酮的镇静和镇痛效果:一项双盲随机临床试验
Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Aug 22;6(5):e39835. doi: 10.5812/aapm.39835. eCollection 2016 Oct.
8
[Propofol-ketamine versus dexmedetomidine-ketamine for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial].[丙泊酚-氯胺酮与右美托咪定-氯胺酮用于小儿上消化道内镜检查镇静的随机临床试验]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020 Nov-Dec;70(6):620-626. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
9
A Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam on Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endosonography Outside the Operating Room.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑对非手术室胃肠内镜检查患者镇静效果的比较
Anesth Pain Med. 2023 May 1;13(3):e109721. doi: 10.5812/aapm-109721. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Comparison of the effects and side-effects of sedation with propofol versus midazolam plus pethidine in patients undergoing endoscopy in Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz.阿瓦士伊玛目霍梅尼医院接受内镜检查患者中丙泊酚与咪达唑仑加哌替啶镇静效果及副作用的比较
Prz Gastroenterol. 2018;13(3):228-233. doi: 10.5114/pg.2018.78288. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Binaural Beats on Anxiety and Tolerance in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Without Sedation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.双耳节拍对未使用镇静剂的上消化道内镜检查患者焦虑及耐受性的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Integr Complement Med. 2024 Dec;30(12):1209-1216. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0804. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
2
Woven endo bridge device for recurrent intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于复发性颅内动脉瘤的编织型腔内桥接装置:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Dec;37(6):688-698. doi: 10.1177/19714009241247457. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
3
Safety of geriatric patients undergoing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with deep sedation: a retrospective study.
老年患者在深度镇静下接受支气管内超声引导经支气管针吸活检的安全性:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug 16;23(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02241-7.
4
Global Trends of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Anesthesia/Sedation: A Bibliometric Study (from 2001 to 2022).全球胃肠内镜麻醉/镇静的趋势:一项文献计量学研究(2001年至2022年)
J Pain Res. 2023 Jul 15;16:2393-2406. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S408811. eCollection 2023.
5
Bronchoscopist-Directed Continuous Flow Propofol Based Analgosedation during Flexible Interventional Bronchoscopy and EBUS.在可弯曲介入性支气管镜检查和超声支气管镜检查期间由支气管镜医师指导的基于丙泊酚的持续血流镇痛镇静
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 22;12(13):4223. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134223.