Department of Pediatrics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 May 24;36(20):e136. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e136.
Sedative upper endoscopy is similar in pediatrics and adults, but it is characteristically more likely to lead to respiratory failure. Although recommended guidelines for pediatric procedural sedation are available within South Korea and internationally, Korean pediatric endoscopists use different drugs, either alone or in combination, in practice. Efforts are being made to minimize the risk of sedation while avoiding procedural challenges. The purpose of this study was to collect and analyze data on the sedation methods used by Korean pediatric endoscopists to help physicians perform pediatric sedative upper endoscopy (PSUE).
The PSUE procedures performed in 15 Korean pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopic units within a year were analyzed. Drugs used for sedation were grouped according to the method of use, and the depth of sedation was evaluated based on the Ramsay scores. The procedures and their complications were also assessed.
In total, 734 patients who underwent PSUE were included. Sedation and monitoring were performed by an anesthesiologist at one of the institutions. The sedative procedures were performed by a pediatric endoscopist at the other 14 institutions. Regarding the number of assistants present during the procedures, 36.6% of procedures had one assistant, 38.8% had 2 assistants, and 24.5% had 3 assistants. The average age of the patients was 11.6 years old. Of the patients, 19.8% had underlying diseases, 10.0% were taking medications such as epilepsy drugs, and 1.0% had snoring or sleep apnea history. The average duration of the procedures was 5.2 minutes. The subjects were divided into 5 groups as follows: 1) midazolam + propofol + ketamine (M + P + K): n = 18, average dose of 0.03 + 2.4 + 0.5 mg/kg; 2) M + P: n = 206, average dose of 0.06 + 2.1 mg/kg; 3) M + K: n = 267, average dose of 0.09 + 0.69 mg/kg; 4) continuous P infusion for 20 minutes: n = 15, average dose of 6.6 mg/kg; 5) M: n = 228, average dose of 0.11 mg/kg. The average Ramsay score for the five groups was 3.7, with significant differences between the groups ( < 0.001). Regarding the adverse effects, desaturation and increased oxygen supply were most prevalent in the M + K group. Decreases and increases in blood pressure were most prevalent in the M + P + K group, and bag-mask ventilation was most used in the M + K group. There were no reported incidents of intubation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A decrease in oxygen saturation was observed in 37 of 734 patients, and it significantly increased in young patients ( = 0.001) and when ketamine was used ( = 0.014). Oxygen saturation was also correlated with dosage ( = 0.037). The use of ketamine ( < 0.001) and propofol ( < 0.001) were identified as factors affecting the Ramsay score in the logistic regression analysis.
Although the drug use by Korean pediatric endoscopists followed the recommended guidelines to an extent, it was apparent that they combined the drugs or reduced the doses depending on the patient characteristics to reduce the likelihood of respiratory failure. Inducing deep sedation facilitates comfort during the procedure, but it also leads to a higher risk of complications.
镇静性上消化道内镜检查在儿科和成人中相似,但更有可能导致呼吸衰竭。尽管韩国和国际上都有儿科程序镇静推荐指南,但韩国儿科内镜医生在实践中使用不同的药物,单独或联合使用。正在努力最大限度地降低镇静风险,同时避免程序挑战。本研究的目的是收集和分析韩国儿科内镜医生使用的镇静方法的数据,以帮助医生进行小儿镇静性上消化道内镜检查(PSUE)。
分析了一年内韩国 15 个儿科胃肠内镜单位进行的 PSUE 程序。根据使用方法将镇静药物分组,并根据 Ramsay 评分评估镇静深度。还评估了程序及其并发症。
共有 734 名接受 PSUE 的患者入选。在一个机构中,由麻醉师进行镇静和监测。在其他 14 个机构中,由儿科内镜医生进行镇静程序。关于程序中存在的助手数量,36.6%的程序有 1 个助手,38.8%有 2 个助手,24.5%有 3 个助手。患者的平均年龄为 11.6 岁。19.8%的患者有基础疾病,10.0%正在服用癫痫药物等药物,1.0%有打鼾或睡眠呼吸暂停史。程序的平均持续时间为 5.2 分钟。受试者分为以下 5 组:1)咪达唑仑+异丙酚+氯胺酮(M+P+K):n=18,平均剂量为 0.03+2.4+0.5mg/kg;2)M+P:n=206,平均剂量为 0.06+2.1mg/kg;3)M+K:n=267,平均剂量为 0.09+0.69mg/kg;4)持续 20 分钟输注异丙酚:n=15,平均剂量为 6.6mg/kg;5)M:n=228,平均剂量为 0.11mg/kg。五组的平均 Ramsay 评分为 3.7,组间差异有统计学意义(<0.001)。关于不良反应,M+K 组最常见的是血氧饱和度降低和氧气供应增加。M+P+K 组最常见的是血压下降和升高,M+K 组最常用的是气囊面罩通气。没有报告插管或心肺复苏的事件。734 名患者中有 37 名血氧饱和度下降,年轻患者(=0.001)和使用氯胺酮时(=0.014)明显增加。血氧饱和度与剂量呈正相关(=0.037)。在逻辑回归分析中,使用氯胺酮(<0.001)和异丙酚(<0.001)被确定为影响 Ramsay 评分的因素。
尽管韩国儿科内镜医生的用药在一定程度上遵循了推荐的指南,但他们根据患者的特点联合使用药物或减少剂量,以降低呼吸衰竭的可能性。诱导深度镇静可在程序中提供舒适感,但也会导致更高的并发症风险。