• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

均匀多属性决策方法:属性间的权衡是否重要?

The Homogeneous MADM Methods: Is Trade-Off between Attributes Important?

机构信息

Department of Management, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Department of Management, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.

出版信息

Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 21;2022:8629986. doi: 10.1155/2022/8629986. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/8629986
PMID:36045955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9420562/
Abstract

Compensatory multiattribute decision-making (MADM) methods are founded on the trade-offs between attributes, allowing an alternative to compensate for its weakness in an attribute with its strength in another attribute. We call them heterogeneous MADM methods because they generally consider the unlimited trade-off between attributes. In other words, they even allow that very poor performance of an attribute to be compensated by the strong performance of another attribute. However, this may not be acceptable to decision makers (DMs). They may accept the limited trade-offs between attributes, making them more homogeneous. In these situations, MADM methods should be modified to consider the limited trade-offs between attributes. This modification comes with some conceptual and technical difficulties. This study presents some examples to show the concept of limited trade-offs clearly and presents a modified version of the simple additive weighting (SAW) method, H-SAW, considering the limited trade-offs between attributes. We also integrate H-SAW and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) methods to supplier selection and illustrate the real application of H-SAW method.

摘要

补偿型多属性决策 (MADM) 方法基于属性之间的权衡,允许替代品在一个属性上的弱点被另一个属性上的优势所弥补。我们称它们为异类 MADM 方法,因为它们通常考虑属性之间的无限权衡。换句话说,它们甚至允许一个属性的非常差的性能被另一个属性的强大性能所弥补。然而,这可能不能被决策者 (DMs) 所接受。他们可能接受属性之间的有限权衡,使它们更具同质性。在这些情况下,MADM 方法应该进行修改,以考虑属性之间的有限权衡。这种修改带来了一些概念和技术上的困难。本研究通过一些例子清楚地展示了有限权衡的概念,并提出了一种基于属性之间有限权衡的简单加性加权 (SAW) 方法的修正版本,即 H-SAW。我们还将 H-SAW 和模糊层次分析法 (FAHP) 方法集成起来,用于供应商选择,并说明了 H-SAW 方法的实际应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f0a/9420562/86118d413e9b/CIN2022-8629986.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f0a/9420562/9d8ab2cbd898/CIN2022-8629986.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f0a/9420562/1f6b99691a1a/CIN2022-8629986.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f0a/9420562/86118d413e9b/CIN2022-8629986.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f0a/9420562/9d8ab2cbd898/CIN2022-8629986.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f0a/9420562/1f6b99691a1a/CIN2022-8629986.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f0a/9420562/86118d413e9b/CIN2022-8629986.003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Homogeneous MADM Methods: Is Trade-Off between Attributes Important?均匀多属性决策方法:属性间的权衡是否重要?
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 21;2022:8629986. doi: 10.1155/2022/8629986. eCollection 2022.
2
A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy.可持续能源背景下加权法和多准则方法的综合分析
Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran). 2021;18(6):1591-1616. doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-02922-7. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MADM method based on TOPSIS and grey correlation analysis.基于TOPSIS和灰色关联分析的区间值直觉模糊多属性决策方法
Math Biosci Eng. 2020 Aug 18;17(5):5584-5603. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020300.
4
Multi-attribute decision making method using advanced Pythagorean fuzzy weighted geometric operator and their applications for real estate company selection.基于先进毕达哥拉斯模糊加权几何算子的多属性决策方法及其在房地产公司选择中的应用
Heliyon. 2021 Jun 17;7(6):e07340. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07340. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Compatibility and correlation of multi-attribute decision making: a case of industrial relocation.多属性决策的兼容性与相关性:以产业转移为例
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Feb 28:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04603-9.
6
Even swaps: a rational method for making trade-offs.偶数交换:一种进行权衡的合理方法。
Harv Bus Rev. 1998 Mar-Apr;76(2):137-8, 143-8, 150.
7
Hybridized fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy weighted average for identifying optimal design concept.用于识别最优设计概念的混合模糊层次分析法和模糊加权平均数法
Heliyon. 2020 Jan 22;6(1):e03182. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03182. eCollection 2020 Jan.
8
A 2-order additive fuzzy measure identification method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic interaction degree and its application in credit assessment.一种基于犹豫模糊语言交互度的二阶加性模糊测度识别方法及其在信用评估中的应用
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 14;14(1):8617. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58919-6.
9
Topic selection for health technology assessment: An approach combining multiple attribute decision making and decision rules.卫生技术评估的主题选择:一种结合多属性决策和决策规则的方法。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Mar 27;35:40. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.40. eCollection 2021.
10
An optimized multi-attribute decision-making approach to construction supply chain management by using complex picture fuzzy soft set.一种基于复杂图像模糊软集的建筑供应链管理优化多属性决策方法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Aug 30;9:e1540. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1540. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainable circular supplier selection: A novel hybrid approach.可持续循环供应商选择:一种新的混合方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 20;722:137936. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137936. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
2
Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends.多准则决策分析在环境科学中的应用及发展趋势:十年回顾。
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 1;409(19):3578-94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
3
Equitable allocation of livers for orthotopic transplantation: an application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
原位肝移植肝脏的公平分配:层次分析法的应用
Eur J Oper Res. 1990;48(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90060-o.