• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国胃肠病学家和内镜医师对人工智能的认知调查

Survey on the perceptions of UK gastroenterologists and endoscopists to artificial intelligence.

作者信息

Kader Rawen, Baggaley Rebecca F, Hussein Mohamed, Ahmad Omer F, Patel Nisha, Corbett Gareth, Dolwani Sunil, Stoyanov Danail, Lovat Laurence B

机构信息

Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 17;13(5):423-429. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101994. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1136/flgastro-2021-101994
PMID:36046492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9380773/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

With the potential integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice, it is essential to understand end users' perception of this novel technology. The aim of this study, which was endorsed by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), was to evaluate the UK gastroenterology and endoscopy communities' views on AI.

METHODS

An online survey was developed and disseminated to gastroenterologists and endoscopists across the UK.

RESULTS

One hundred four participants completed the survey. Quality improvement in endoscopy (97%) and better endoscopic diagnosis (92%) were perceived as the most beneficial applications of AI to clinical practice. The most significant challenges were accountability for incorrect diagnoses (85%) and potential bias of algorithms (82%). A lack of guidelines (92%) was identified as the greatest barrier to adopting AI in routine clinical practice. Participants identified real-time endoscopic image diagnosis (95%) as a research priority for AI, while the most perceived significant barriers to AI research were funding (82%) and the availability of annotated data (76%). Participants consider the priorities for the BSG AI Task Force to be identifying research priorities (96%), guidelines for adopting AI devices in clinical practice (93%) and supporting the delivery of multicentre clinical trials (91%).

CONCLUSION

This survey has identified views from the UK gastroenterology and endoscopy community regarding AI in clinical practice and research, and identified priorities for the newly formed BSG AI Task Force.

摘要

背景与目的

随着人工智能(AI)有可能融入临床实践,了解终端用户对这项新技术的看法至关重要。本研究得到了英国胃肠病学会(BSG)的认可,旨在评估英国胃肠病学和内镜检查领域对AI的看法。

方法

开展了一项在线调查,并将其分发给英国各地的胃肠病学家和内镜医师。

结果

104名参与者完成了调查。内镜检查质量的改善(97%)和更好的内镜诊断(92%)被认为是AI在临床实践中最有益的应用。最显著的挑战是对错误诊断负责(85%)和算法的潜在偏差(82%)。缺乏指南(92%)被确定为在常规临床实践中采用AI的最大障碍。参与者将实时内镜图像诊断(95%)确定为AI的研究重点,而AI研究最明显的障碍是资金(82%)和标注数据的可用性(76%)。参与者认为BSG AI特别工作组的优先事项是确定研究重点(96%)、临床实践中采用AI设备的指南(93%)以及支持多中心临床试验的开展(91%)。

结论

本次调查确定了英国胃肠病学和内镜检查领域对临床实践和研究中AI的看法,并确定了新成立的BSG AI特别工作组的优先事项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49e/9380773/e50d2b14aa37/flgastro-2021-101994f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49e/9380773/06a5e0a65977/flgastro-2021-101994f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49e/9380773/967d7bd6133f/flgastro-2021-101994f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49e/9380773/4d44b2be96e9/flgastro-2021-101994f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49e/9380773/e50d2b14aa37/flgastro-2021-101994f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49e/9380773/06a5e0a65977/flgastro-2021-101994f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49e/9380773/967d7bd6133f/flgastro-2021-101994f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49e/9380773/4d44b2be96e9/flgastro-2021-101994f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b49e/9380773/e50d2b14aa37/flgastro-2021-101994f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Survey on the perceptions of UK gastroenterologists and endoscopists to artificial intelligence.英国胃肠病学家和内镜医师对人工智能的认知调查
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 17;13(5):423-429. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101994. eCollection 2022.
2
Physician perceptions on the current and future impact of artificial intelligence to the field of gastroenterology.医生对人工智能当前和未来对胃肠病学领域影响的看法。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Apr;99(4):483-489.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.053. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
3
Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology.关于人工智能在内窥镜检查中的当前应用情况、解决障碍以及推动胃肠病学领域人工智能发展的共识声明。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jan;101(1):2-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.003. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
Proceedings from the First Global Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Summit.第一届全球人工智能消化内镜峰会会议录。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Oct;92(4):938-945.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.044. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
5
Position statement on priorities for artificial intelligence in GI endoscopy: a report by the ASGE Task Force.胃肠内镜人工智能优先事项立场声明:美国胃肠内镜学会特别工作组报告
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Oct;92(4):951-959. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.035. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
6
Beauty Is in the AI of the Beholder: Are We Ready for the Clinical Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Radiography? An Exploratory Analysis of Perceived AI Knowledge, Skills, Confidence, and Education Perspectives of UK Radiographers.美在观察者的人工智能之中:我们是否准备好将人工智能临床整合到放射成像中?对英国放射技师的人工智能知识、技能、信心和教育观点的探索性分析。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Nov 11;3:739327. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.739327. eCollection 2021.
7
Risk Perception, Acceptance, and Trust of Using AI in Gastroenterology Practice in the Asia-Pacific Region: Web-Based Survey Study.亚太地区胃肠病学实践中使用人工智能的风险认知、接受度和信任度:基于网络的调查研究
JMIR AI. 2024 Mar 7;3:e50525. doi: 10.2196/50525.
8
Charting a path forward for clinical research in artificial intelligence and gastroenterology.绘制人工智能与胃肠病学临床研究的前进道路。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(1):4-12. doi: 10.1111/den.13974. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
9
Modeling the influence of attitudes, trust, and beliefs on endoscopists' acceptance of artificial intelligence applications in medical practice.模拟态度、信任和信念对内镜医师在医疗实践中接受人工智能应用的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 28;11:1301563. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1301563. eCollection 2023.
10
Artificial Intelligence in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.人工智能在上消化道内镜中的应用。
Dig Dis. 2022;40(4):395-408. doi: 10.1159/000518232. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Provider Attitudes and Perceptions on Using Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.结肠镜检查中医疗服务提供者对使用人工智能的态度和认知:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Gastro Hep Adv. 2025 Jul 11;4(10):100746. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100746. eCollection 2025.
2
Survey on the perceptions of Asian endoscopists to artificial intelligence.亚洲内镜医师对人工智能的认知调查
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jul 29;5(1):313. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01030-2.
3
Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Among Gastroenterologists in Italy: A National Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using convolutional neural networks.基于卷积神经网络的结直肠息肉光学诊断
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 21;27(35):5908-5918. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i35.5908.
2
Novel artificial intelligence-driven software significantly shortens the time required for annotation in computer vision projects.新型人工智能驱动软件显著缩短了计算机视觉项目中注释所需的时间。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Apr;9(4):E621-E626. doi: 10.1055/a-1341-0689. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
3
DECIDE-AI: new reporting guidelines to bridge the development-to-implementation gap in clinical artificial intelligence.
意大利胃肠病学家对人工智能的认知:一项全国性调查。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;17(8):1353. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081353.
4
Deep Learning for Image Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Esophageal Cancer.深度学习在食管癌诊断与管理中的图像分析应用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;16(19):3285. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193285.
5
Risk Perception, Acceptance, and Trust of Using AI in Gastroenterology Practice in the Asia-Pacific Region: Web-Based Survey Study.亚太地区胃肠病学实践中使用人工智能的风险认知、接受度和信任度:基于网络的调查研究
JMIR AI. 2024 Mar 7;3:e50525. doi: 10.2196/50525.
6
Human-artificial intelligence interaction in gastrointestinal endoscopy.胃肠内镜检查中的人机交互
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Mar 16;16(3):126-135. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.126.
7
Clinical impact of artificial intelligence-based solutions on imaging of the pancreas and liver.基于人工智能的解决方案对胰腺和肝脏成像的临床影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 7;29(9):1427-1445. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i9.1427.
DECIDE-AI:弥合临床人工智能从研发到应用差距的新报告指南。
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):186-187. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01229-5.
4
Artificial intelligence and computational pathology.人工智能与计算病理学。
Lab Invest. 2021 Apr;101(4):412-422. doi: 10.1038/s41374-020-00514-0. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
5
Deep learning-enabled medical computer vision.基于深度学习的医学计算机视觉。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Jan 8;4(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00376-2.
6
Establishing key research questions for the implementation of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a modified Delphi method.确立人工智能在结肠镜检查中应用的关键研究问题:一项改良 Delphi 法研究。
Endoscopy. 2021 Sep;53(9):893-901. doi: 10.1055/a-1306-7590. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
7
Assessing perspectives on artificial intelligence applications to gastroenterology.评估人工智能在胃肠病学领域应用的相关观点。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Apr;93(4):971-975.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.029. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
8
Physician sentiment toward artificial intelligence (AI) in colonoscopic practice: a survey of US gastroenterologists.结肠镜检查实践中医生对人工智能(AI)的看法:对美国胃肠病学家的一项调查。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1379-E1384. doi: 10.1055/a-1223-1926. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study.计算机辅助检测辅助结肠镜检查与常规白光结肠镜检查在前瞻性串联研究中的腺瘤检出率较低。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Oct;159(4):1252-1261.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
Developing specific reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies assessing AI interventions: The STARD-AI Steering Group.为评估人工智能干预措施的诊断准确性研究制定特定报告指南:STARD-AI指导小组。
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):807-808. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0941-1.