Stoeckle James H, Davies Faith E, Williams Louis, Boyle Eileen M, Morgan Gareth J
Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2021;2(4):355-373. doi: 10.37349/etat.2021.00050. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) has dramatically changed over the last three decades, moving from no US Food and Drug Administration approvals and two active drug classes to over 19 drug approvals and at least eight different active classes. The advances seen in MM therapy have relied on both a structured approach to obtaining new labels and cautious off-label drug use. Although there are country and regional differences in drug approval processes, many of the basic principles behind off-label drug use in MM can be summarized into four main categories: 1) use of a therapy prior to the current approval regulations; 2) widespread use of a therapy following the release of promising clinical trial results but prior to drug approval; 3) use of a cheap therapy supported by clinical safety and efficacy data but without commercial backing; and 4) niche therapies for small well-defined patient populations where large clinical trials with sufficient power may be difficult to perform. This review takes a historical approach to discuss how off-label drug use has helped to shape the current treatment approach for MM.
在过去三十年中,多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的治疗格局发生了巨大变化,从没有美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的批准且仅有两类有效药物,发展到有超过19种药物获批且至少有八种不同的有效药物类别。MM治疗方面取得的进展既依赖于获得新标签的结构化方法,也依赖于谨慎的超说明书用药。尽管药物审批程序存在国家和地区差异,但MM超说明书用药背后的许多基本原则可归纳为四大类:1)在当前批准规定之前使用某种疗法;2)在有前景的临床试验结果发布后但在药物获批之前广泛使用某种疗法;3)使用有临床安全性和有效性数据支持但无商业支持的廉价疗法;4)针对明确的小患者群体的小众疗法,这类疗法可能难以开展有足够效力的大型临床试验。本综述采用历史方法来探讨超说明书用药如何塑造了当前MM的治疗方法。