Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador-Zubirán (INCMyN-SZ, Mexico City, Mexico.
Emergency Medicine Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador-Zubirán (INCMyN-SZ), Mexico City, Mexico.
J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Jul;30(6):931-940. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221122098. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
Patients and physicians can naturally adopt hybrid healthcare models that combine face-to-face consultations with telemedicine. The study's objective was to compare the impact of two healthcare interventions, hybrid care modality and face-to-face consultation, on the patient-reported outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients, during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Consecutive outpatients reincorporated to a clinic previously in lockdown were invited to a non-inferiority, randomized study (October 2020--May 2022). Patients were randomized to 6 months of face-to-face consultation or hybrid care modality (intervention period-1) and then the converse modality (intervention period-2). The primary outcome was disease activity/severity behavior (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3). Additional patient-reported outcomes were disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index), quality-of-life (World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire-brief version), adherence and satisfaction with medical care, and treatment recommendation. Sample size calculation established 55 patients/healthcare interventions.
There were 138 patients invited to participate, 130 agreed and 121 completed their study participation. Sixty-one and 60 patients respectively, received face-to-face consultation and hybrid care modality over intervention period-1. Patients were primarily middle-aged females (90.1%), with (median, IQR) 12 (9-16) years of education, long-standing disease, working (62.8%), receiving disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (96.7%), and corticosteroids (61.2%). Patients had low disease activity (median Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3: 2.7) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index score that translated into the absence of disability, while quality of life was compromised. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients assigned to each healthcare intervention. Differences in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 behavior were below the non-inferiority margin. Results considered the order in which patients received the intervention and baselines scores, and extended to the patient-reported outcomes left.
Hybrid care modality was non-inferior to in-person consultations in achieving patient-reported outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
患者和医生可以自然采用混合医疗模式,将面对面咨询与远程医疗相结合。本研究的目的是比较两种医疗干预措施,即混合护理模式和面对面咨询,对 COVID-19 大流行期间类风湿关节炎患者的患者报告结局的影响。
连续重新纳入以前处于封锁状态的诊所的门诊患者被邀请参加一项非劣效性、随机研究(2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 5 月)。患者被随机分为 6 个月的面对面咨询或混合护理模式(干预期-1),然后是相反的模式(干预期-2)。主要结局是疾病活动/严重程度行为(常规评估患者指数数据 3)。额外的患者报告结局包括残疾(健康评估问卷残疾指数)、生活质量(世界卫生组织生活质量问卷-简短版)、对医疗护理的依从性和满意度以及治疗建议。样本量计算确定了 55 名患者/医疗干预。
共邀请 138 名患者参加,130 名同意,121 名完成了研究参与。分别有 61 名和 60 名患者在干预期-1 期间接受了面对面咨询和混合护理模式。患者主要为中年女性(90.1%),接受过(中位数,IQR)12 年(9-16 年)教育,疾病持续时间长,工作(62.8%),接受疾病修正抗风湿药物(96.7%)和皮质类固醇(61.2%)。患者疾病活动度低(常规评估患者指数数据 3 的中位数:2.7),健康评估问卷残疾指数评分表明无残疾,而生活质量受损。分配给每种医疗干预的患者的基线特征相似。常规评估患者指数数据 3 行为的差异低于非劣效性边界。结果考虑了患者接受干预的顺序和基线评分,并扩展到了剩余的患者报告结局。
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,混合护理模式在类风湿关节炎患者的患者报告结局方面不亚于面对面咨询。