• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区样本中关系困扰和亲密伴侣暴力的重叠。

Overlap of relationship distress and intimate partner violence in community samples.

机构信息

Family Translational Research Group.

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2023 Feb;37(1):37-44. doi: 10.1037/fam0001031. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1037/fam0001031
PMID:36048072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9870926/
Abstract

Mixed-gender couples presenting for couple therapy are at 2-3 times higher risk for physical intimate partner violence (IPV) than community couples. However, it is unclear if this elevation of relative risk is the same in the general population because relationship distress and treatment-seeking are often confounded. We used archival data from three representative U.S. civilian samples and one representative U.S. Air Force sample to test the hypothesis that clinically significant relationship distress is associated with increased risk of various forms of IPV. In these community samples, those in mixed-gender distressed relationships were at 2-3 times higher risk than those in nondistressed relationships for any physical IPV during the past year and at 3-6 times higher risk for clinically significant psychological and physical IPV during the past year. Given that the increase in IPV risk is similar for individuals in distressed community relationships and therapy-seeking relationships, the prior findings of the elevated rates of IPV in clinical samples are unlikely to be due to therapy-seeking. Although epidemiological risk involves statistical, not causal, associations, the increased co-occurrence of IPV in distressed mixed-gender couples fits with numerous theories of IPV and has implications for both screening and future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

混合性别伴侣接受夫妻治疗的身体亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)风险比社区伴侣高 2-3 倍。然而,由于关系困扰和寻求治疗往往混淆不清,尚不清楚这种相对风险的升高是否在普通人群中相同。我们使用来自三个具有代表性的美国平民样本和一个具有代表性的美国空军样本的档案数据来检验以下假设:临床显著的关系困扰与各种形式的 IPV 风险增加有关。在这些社区样本中,与无困扰关系相比,处于混合性别困扰关系中的人在过去一年中任何身体 IPV 的风险高 2-3 倍,在过去一年中具有临床意义的心理和身体 IPV 的风险高 3-6 倍。鉴于困扰社区关系和寻求治疗关系中的个体的 IPV 风险增加相似,临床样本中 IPV 率升高的先前发现不太可能是由于寻求治疗。虽然流行病学风险涉及统计而非因果关系,但困扰的混合性别伴侣中 IPV 的发生率增加与许多 IPV 理论相符,对筛查和未来研究都具有意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Overlap of relationship distress and intimate partner violence in community samples.社区样本中关系困扰和亲密伴侣暴力的重叠。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Feb;37(1):37-44. doi: 10.1037/fam0001031. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
2
Couples with Intimate Partner Violence Seeking Relationship Help: Associations and Implications for Self-Help and Online Interventions.夫妻暴力寻求关系帮助:对自助和在线干预的关联和影响。
Fam Process. 2018 Jun;57(2):293-307. doi: 10.1111/famp.12291. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
3
Exploring Alcohol Use and IPV Among Couples Presenting to Couple Therapy: A Brief Note.探讨夫妻共同接受夫妻治疗中酒精使用与 IPV 之间的关系:简要说明。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jun;36(11-12):NP5772-NP5783. doi: 10.1177/0886260518807220. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
4
The heterogeneity of intimate partner violence and its associations with distressed couples' emotional communication.亲密伴侣暴力的异质性及其与苦恼夫妻情感沟通的关系。
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Oct;38(7):1051-1062. doi: 10.1037/fam0001242. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
5
The role of intimate partner violence and relationship satisfaction in couples' interpersonal emotional arousal.亲密伴侣暴力和关系满意度在夫妻人际情绪唤起中的作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Apr;36(3):385-395. doi: 10.1037/fam0000911. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
6
Intimate partner violence in female same-gender couples: An investigation of actor-partner correlates within the past year.女性同性伴侣中的亲密伴侣暴力:过去一年中伴侣间的关联因素调查。
Psychol Trauma. 2022 Jul;14(5):759-768. doi: 10.1037/tra0001041. Epub 2021 May 6.
7
Examining strength at home couples to prevent intimate partner violence on a military installation: A randomized controlled trial.在军事设施上检查家庭伴侣的力量以预防亲密伴侣暴力:一项随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Apr;92(4):202-212. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000863. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
8
Strength at Home Couples program to prevent military partner violence: A randomized controlled trial.“家庭力量”项目预防军人伴侣暴力:一项随机对照试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Nov;84(11):935-945. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000129. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
9
Identifying unique and shared risk factors for physical intimate partner violence and clinically-significant physical intimate partner violence.识别身体亲密伴侣暴力及具有临床意义的身体亲密伴侣暴力的独特和共同风险因素。
Aggress Behav. 2015 May;41(3):227-41. doi: 10.1002/ab.21565.
10
Prevalence of Self-Reported Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Among Military Personnel: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.军人中自我报告的亲密伴侣暴力受害率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020 Jul;21(3):586-609. doi: 10.1177/1524838018782206. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Intimate Partner Violence Within the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Associations Among Veterans.2019冠状病毒病大流行第一年期间的亲密伴侣暴力行为:退伍军人中的纵向关联
Psychol Violence. 2024;14(5):335-344. doi: 10.1037/vio0000514.
2
Couple Conflict Behavior: Disentangling Associations With Relationship Dissatisfaction and Intimate Partner Violence.夫妻冲突行为:理清与关系不满和亲密伴侣暴力的关联
J Fam Issues. 2023 Nov;44(11):2997-3016. doi: 10.1177/0192513x221123787. Epub 2022 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Categories and health impacts of intimate partner violence in the World Health Organization multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence.《世界卫生组织多国妇女健康和家庭暴力研究中亲密伴侣暴力的类别和健康影响》。
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 May 17;50(2):652-662. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa220.
2
High sensitivity and specificity screening for clinically significant intimate partner violence.高灵敏度和特异性筛选具有临床意义的亲密伴侣暴力。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Feb;35(1):80-91. doi: 10.1037/fam0000781. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Self-reporting DSM-5/ICD-11 clinically significant intimate partner violence and child abuse: Convergent and response process validity.DSM-5/ICD-11 自我报告的临床显著亲密伴侣暴力和儿童虐待:聚合和反应过程有效性。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):101-111. doi: 10.1037/fam0000560. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.筛查亲密伴侣暴力、虐待老人和虐待弱势成年人:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2018 Oct 23;320(16):1688-1701. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13212.
5
Recent intimate partner violence against women and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.近期亲密伴侣对女性的暴力行为与健康:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 28;8(7):e019995. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019995.
6
Trauma and PTSD in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys.世界卫生组织世界心理健康调查中的创伤与创伤后应激障碍
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Oct 27;8(sup5):1353383. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1353383. eCollection 2017.
7
Provider Screening and Counseling for Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review of Practices and Influencing Factors.医疗机构筛查和咨询亲密伴侣暴力行为:实践与影响因素的系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017 Dec;18(5):479-495. doi: 10.1177/1524838016637080. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
8
Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review.婚姻质量与健康:一项元分析综述
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):140-187. doi: 10.1037/a0031859. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
9
Changes in negative attributions during couple therapy for abusive behavior: relations to changes in satisfaction and behavior.夫妻虐待行为治疗过程中负性归因的变化:与满意度和行为变化的关系。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2012 Jun;38 Suppl 1:117-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00264.x. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
10
Allostatic processes in the family.家庭中的适应过程。
Dev Psychopathol. 2011 Aug;23(3):921-38. doi: 10.1017/S095457941100040X.