Department of Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, Zagreb, Croatia.
School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Updates Surg. 2022 Dec;74(6):1933-1941. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01368-5. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
Several scoring systems exist for the management of acute appendicitis (AA) during pregnancy. However, the systems are based on the nonpregnant adult population. The aim of this study was to create a highly accurate scoring system that can be applied to pregnant women and to compare it to the most commonly used scores in general population and pregnant women. The creation and subsequent implementation of a highly accurate score system could shorten the diagnostic period and minimize the use of (ionizing) diagnostic imaging allowing the selection of the best treatment approach in pregnant patients with acute appendicitis. A single-center, retrospective cohort observational study was conducted at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. Data were extracted from medical records of pregnant patients with suspected AA from January 2010 to December 2020. A total of 59 pregnant patients diagnosed with AA during pregnancy were identified, 41 were treated surgically, and 18 had non-surgical management. The main objective of our study was the detection of predictive factors of AA during pregnancy. Anorexia, pain migration to the right lower quadrant, rebound pain, axillary temperature over 37.3 °C, CRP/platelet ratio > 0.0422, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio > 7.182, and ultrasonic signs of AA were scored. Scoring in Appendicitis TriMOdal Score (ATMOS) consists of positive clinical parameter, each bringing 1 point and other parameters mentioned above that bring 2 points each. The score ranges from 0 to 10. Our model of ATMOS yields a high area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.963. The positive likelihood ratio is 9.97 (95% CI 2.64-38.00), and the negative likelihood ratio is 0.1 (95% CI 0.03-0.31), meaning that 94% of cases with ATMOS > 4 have AA, while less than 13% with an ATMOS ≤ 4 have the diagnosis of AA. The potential of ATMOS differentiating AA during pregnancy was demonstrated. Future prospective, randomized trials are needed to evaluate its accuracy and whether it should be used instead of Alvarado or Tzanakis scores in clinical decision-making.Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT05202483. Date of registration: January 21, 2022.
目前存在几种用于管理妊娠期急性阑尾炎(AA)的评分系统。然而,这些系统都是基于非妊娠成年人人群的数据。本研究的目的是创建一种高度准确的评分系统,可应用于孕妇,并将其与普通人群和孕妇中最常用的评分进行比较。创建和随后实施高度准确的评分系统可以缩短诊断时间,最大限度地减少(电离)诊断成像的使用,从而为患有急性阑尾炎的孕妇选择最佳的治疗方法。这是一项在克罗地亚萨格勒布大学医院中心进行的单中心、回顾性队列观察研究。研究人员从 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间疑似患有 AA 的孕妇的医疗记录中提取了数据。共确定了 59 例妊娠期诊断为 AA 的孕妇,其中 41 例接受了手术治疗,18 例接受了非手术治疗。我们的研究的主要目的是检测妊娠期 AA 的预测因素。厌食、疼痛向右下腹转移、反弹痛、腋窝温度超过 37.3°C、C 反应蛋白/血小板比值>0.0422、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值>7.182 和超声 AA 征象被评分。在阑尾炎三联评分(ATMOS)中,阳性临床参数各记 1 分,上述其他参数各记 2 分。评分范围为 0 至 10。我们的 ATMOS 模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.963。阳性似然比为 9.97(95%CI 2.64-38.00),阴性似然比为 0.1(95%CI 0.03-0.31),这意味着 94%的 ATMOS>4 病例患有 AA,而 ATMOS≤4 的病例中不到 13%的诊断为 AA。该研究证明了 ATMOS 可用于区分妊娠期 AA。需要未来的前瞻性、随机试验来评估其准确性,以及它是否应该用于替代 Alvarado 或 Tzanakis 评分进行临床决策。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT05202483。注册日期:2022 年 1 月 21 日。