Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.
Madison ENT & Facial Plastic Surgery, New York, New York.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct 1;148(10):940-946. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2293.
Nasal valve collapse is a primary cause of nasal airway obstruction (NAO). Patients with NAO and nasal valve collapse experience a variety of symptoms that lower their quality of life, such as nasal congestion, headache, sleep disturbance, daytime sleepiness, and snoring.
To determine if active treatment of the nasal valve with a temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TCRF) device, previously demonstrated superior to a sham procedure at 3 months, was safe and associated with sustained improvements in symptoms of NAO through 12 months.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial, patients in 16 centers in the US with index procedures between August and December 2020 were assigned to TCRF device treatment of the nasal valve or a sham control procedure (no RF energy). Patients had a baseline Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale score of 55 or greater with nasal valve collapse as the primary or substantial contributor to NAO. After primary end point evaluation at 3 months, eligible patients in the sham control arm crossed over to active treatment. Data analysis was performed between April and May 2022.
Patients were treated bilaterally with the TCRF device at 4 or fewer nonoverlapping areas on the nasal mucosa at the junction of the upper and lower lateral cartilage on the lateral nasal wall.
The primary end point measure was responder rate, defined as 20% or greater reduction in NOSE Scale score or 1 or greater reduction in NOSE Scale clinical severity category.
A total of 108 patients received active treatment (77 as index active treatment, 31 after crossover). The mean (SD) age of patients was 48.5 (12.3) years; 66 (61.1%) were women. The combined group of patients receiving active treatment had a mean baseline NOSE Scale score of 76.3 (95% CI, 73.6-79.1). At 12 months (n = 88), the responder rate was 89.8% (95% CI, 81.7%-94.5%). The NOSE Scale score improved from baseline (mean change, -44.9 [95% CI, -52.1 to -37.7]). No device/procedure-related serious adverse events were reported.
In this follow-up of a cohort from a randomized clinical trial, the minimally invasive TCRF device, previously demonstrated to be superior to a sham procedure, was safe and associated with improvement in symptoms of NAO through 12 months postprocedure.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04549545.
鼻阀塌陷是鼻气道阻塞 (NAO) 的主要原因。患有 NAO 和鼻阀塌陷的患者会出现多种症状,这些症状会降低他们的生活质量,例如鼻塞、头痛、睡眠障碍、白天嗜睡和打鼾。
确定先前在 3 个月时显示优于假手术的经温控射频 (TCRF) 设备主动治疗鼻阀是否安全,并与 12 个月时 NAO 症状的持续改善相关。
设计、地点和参与者:在一项前瞻性、多中心、单盲、随机临床试验中,美国 16 个中心的患者在 2020 年 8 月至 12 月期间进行了索引程序,他们被分配到 TCRF 设备治疗鼻阀或假对照程序(无射频能量)。患者的基线鼻腔阻塞症状评估 (NOSE) 量表评分为 55 或更高,并且鼻阀塌陷是 NAO 的主要或主要原因。在 3 个月时进行主要终点评估后,假对照臂中的合格患者交叉到主动治疗。数据分析于 2022 年 4 月至 5 月进行。
患者在外侧鼻壁的上下外侧软骨交界处的鼻黏膜上用 TCRF 设备以 4 个或更少的非重叠区域进行双侧治疗。
主要终点测量指标是应答率,定义为 NOSE 量表评分降低 20%或更多,或 NOSE 量表临床严重程度类别降低 1 个或更多。
共有 108 名患者接受了积极治疗(77 名作为索引积极治疗,31 名交叉后)。患者的平均(SD)年龄为 48.5(12.3)岁;66 名(61.1%)为女性。接受积极治疗的联合组患者的基线 NOSE 量表评分为 76.3(95%CI,73.6-79.1)。在 12 个月时(n=88),应答率为 89.8%(95%CI,81.7%-94.5%)。NOSE 量表评分从基线(平均变化,-44.9[95%CI,-52.1 至-37.7])改善。未报告与设备/程序相关的严重不良事件。
在这项随机临床试验队列的随访中,先前证明优于假手术的微创 TCRF 设备是安全的,并与术后 12 个月时 NAO 症状的改善相关。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04549545。