Suppr超能文献

右心室不应期作为心动过速诱发的决定因素

Refractoriness as a determinant of tachycardia inducibility in the right ventricle.

作者信息

Somberg J C, Schwartz J

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1987 Aug;114(2):311-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90496-0.

Abstract

The use of more than one right ventricular site for programmed electrical stimulation has been reported to increase the number of patients in whom ventricular tachycardia can be provoked. To determine a possible reason for these observations, programmed ventricular tachycardia studies were evaluated in 316 patients (185 men and 131 women) with a mean age of 63 +/- 7 years who presented with ventricular tachycardia or cardiac arrest. The underlying cardiac disease was atherosclerosis (81%), cardiomyopathy (15%), valvular heart disease (3%), and miscellaneous conditions (1%). Programmed electrical stimulation studies employed a six-beat pacing train, at a cycle length of 500 msec with the introduction of one to three premature stimuli at twice diastolic threshold at the right ventricular apex. If ventricular tachycardia at the right ventricular apex could not be provoked in a patient, the study was repeated at the right ventricular outflow tract. A total of 36 patients were studied at the right ventricular outflow tract. Eleven (31%) were provoked into ventricular tachycardia, while 25 (69%) were not. No difference existed between the QRS, QT, and QTc intervals between those having ventricular tachycardia provoked at the outflow tract compared to those without inducible tachycardia at the right ventricular outflow tract. The effective refractory period was 280 +/- 5 msec at the right ventricular outflow tract in those patients not inducible, and 226 +/- 4 msec in those inducible (p less than 0.05). We defined the change in ventricular refractory period as the difference in the effective refractory period at the right ventricular outflow tract minus the effective refractory period at the right ventricular apex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

据报道,使用多个右心室部位进行程序性电刺激可增加能诱发出室性心动过速的患者数量。为了确定这些观察结果的可能原因,对316例(185例男性和131例女性)平均年龄为63±7岁、出现室性心动过速或心脏骤停的患者进行了程序性室性心动过速研究。基础心脏疾病为动脉粥样硬化(81%)、心肌病(15%)、瓣膜性心脏病(3%)和其他情况(1%)。程序性电刺激研究采用六次起搏脉冲序列,周期长度为500毫秒,在右心室尖处以舒张期阈值的两倍引入一至三个期前刺激。如果在患者右心室尖部不能诱发出室性心动过速,则在右心室流出道重复该研究。共有36例患者在右心室流出道进行了研究。11例(31%)诱发出室性心动过速,而25例(69%)未诱发。与右心室流出道未诱发出心动过速的患者相比,右心室流出道诱发出室性心动过速的患者在QRS、QT和QTc间期方面没有差异。在右心室流出道,未诱发出室性心动过速的患者有效不应期为280±5毫秒,诱发出室性心动过速的患者有效不应期为226±4毫秒(p<0.05)。我们将心室不应期的变化定义为右心室流出道有效不应期减去右心室尖部有效不应期的差值。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验