• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国治疗共享患者的医院之间的电子连接。

Electronic Connectivity Among US Hospitals Treating Shared Patients.

机构信息

Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC.

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2022 Dec 1;60(12):880-887. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001773. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001773
PMID:36049157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9645543/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing electronic health information exchange (HIE) between provider organizations is a top policy priority that has been pursued by establishing varied types of networks.

OBJECTIVES

To measure electronic connectivity enabled by these networks, including community, electronic health record vendor, and national HIE networks, across US hospitals weighted by the volume of shared patients and identify characteristics that predict connectivity.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of 1721 hospitals comprising 16,344 hospital pairs and 6,492,232 shared patients from 2018 CareSet Labs HOP data and national hospital surveys.

SUBJECTS

Pairs of US acute care hospitals that delivered care to 11 or more of the same fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2018.

MEASURES

Whether a patient was treated by a pair of hospitals connected through participation in the same HIE network ("connected hospitals") or not connected because the hospitals participated in different networks, only 1 participated, or both did not participate.

RESULTS

Sixty-four percent of shared patients were treated by connected hospitals. Of the remaining shared patients, 14% were treated by hospital pairs that participated in different HIE networks, 21% by pairs in which only 1 hospital participated in an HIE network, and 2% by pairs in which neither participated. Patients treated by pairs with at least 1 for-profit hospital, and by pairs located in competitive markets, were less likely to be treated by connected hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

While the majority of shared patients received care from connected hospitals, remaining gaps could be filled by connecting HIE networks to each other and by incentivizing certain types of hospitals that may not participate because of competitive concerns.

摘要

背景

增加医疗机构之间的电子健康信息交换(HIE)是一项首要政策,通过建立各种类型的网络来实现这一目标。

目的

通过衡量这些网络(包括社区、电子病历供应商和国家 HIE 网络)在全美医院中的电子连接能力,这些网络以共享患者的数量为权重,并确定预测连接性的特征。

研究设计

对 2018 年 CareSet Labs HOP 数据和全国医院调查中包含的 1721 家医院、16344 对医院和 6492222 名共享患者进行的横断面分析。

研究对象

2018 年为 11 名或以上相同医疗保险受益人的同一组患者提供服务的美国急性护理医院对。

测量指标

患者是否由通过参与相同 HIE 网络而连接的一对医院(“连接医院”)或由于医院参与不同网络、只有 1 家医院参与、或两家医院均不参与而未连接来治疗。

结果

64%的共享患者由连接医院治疗。其余的共享患者中,14%由参与不同 HIE 网络的医院对治疗,21%由仅 1 家医院参与 HIE 网络的医院对治疗,2%由两家医院均未参与的医院对治疗。由至少有 1 家营利性医院的医院对和位于竞争市场的医院对治疗的患者,不太可能由连接医院治疗。

结论

虽然大多数共享患者接受了连接医院的治疗,但通过将 HIE 网络相互连接,并激励那些可能因竞争担忧而不参与的特定类型的医院,可以填补剩余的差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d798/9645543/b3e85a29956a/mlr-60-880-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d798/9645543/fdccdb10594d/mlr-60-880-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d798/9645543/9ce8cbe0d1d8/mlr-60-880-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d798/9645543/b3e85a29956a/mlr-60-880-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d798/9645543/fdccdb10594d/mlr-60-880-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d798/9645543/9ce8cbe0d1d8/mlr-60-880-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d798/9645543/b3e85a29956a/mlr-60-880-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Electronic Connectivity Among US Hospitals Treating Shared Patients.美国治疗共享患者的医院之间的电子连接。
Med Care. 2022 Dec 1;60(12):880-887. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001773. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
Electronic connectivity between hospital pairs: impact on emergency department-related utilization.医院间的电子连接:对急诊科相关利用的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):15-23. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad204.
3
Gaps in health information exchange between hospitals that treat many shared patients.医院之间在治疗许多共同患者的健康信息交流方面存在差距。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1114-1121. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy089.
4
Engagement In Hospital Health Information Exchange Is Associated With Vendor Marketplace Dominance.参与医院健康信息交换与供应商市场主导地位相关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jul 1;35(7):1286-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1215.
5
Electronic Health Information Exchange At Discharge From Inpatient Psychiatric Care In Acute Care Hospitals.急性护理医院住院精神科护理出院时的电子健康信息交换
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jun;39(6):958-967. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00985.
6
The Impact of Health Information Exchange on In-Hospital and Postdischarge Mortality in Older Adults with Alzheimer Disease Readmitted to a Different Hospital Within 30 Days of Discharge: Cohort Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.健康信息交换对出院30天内再次入住不同医院的阿尔茨海默病老年患者住院期间及出院后死亡率的影响:医疗保险受益人的队列研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Mar 10;6:e41936. doi: 10.2196/41936.
7
Use of Electronic Health Information Technology in a National Sample of Hospitals That Provide Specialty Substance Use Care.电子健康信息技术在提供专业物质使用护理的全国医院样本中的使用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Dec 1;72(12):1370-1376. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000816. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
8
Successes and Barriers of Health Information Exchange Participation Across Hospitals in South Carolina From 2014 to 2020: Longitudinal Observational Study.2014年至2020年南卡罗来纳州各医院健康信息交换参与情况的成功与障碍:纵向观察研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Sep 28;11:e40959. doi: 10.2196/40959.
9
Investing in Post-Acute Care Transitions: Electronic Information Exchange Between Hospitals and Long-Term Care Facilities.投资于急性后期护理过渡:医院与长期护理机构之间的电子信息交换。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jan;18(1):30-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
10
Mind the gap: the potential of alternative health information exchange.注意差距:替代健康信息交流的潜力。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jan;25(1):32-38.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital Health Information Exchange Network Density and Predictors Across U.S. Hospital Referral Regions.美国医院转诊区域的医院健康信息交换网络密度及预测因素
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Mar;16(2):463-471. doi: 10.1055/a-2516-1692. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Electronic connectivity between hospital pairs: impact on emergency department-related utilization.医院间的电子连接:对急诊科相关利用的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):15-23. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad204.