Am J Manag Care. 2022 Aug;28(6 Spec No.):SP316-SP323. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89209.
Pharmacy benefit managers use measures like the medication possession ratio (MPR) as a performance/quality metric to evaluate specialty pharmacies and assess direct and indirect remuneration clawback fees. Abundant evidence shows that measuring MPR does not correlate with patients' experiences while on oral cancer oncolytics and does not accurately reflect their clinical outcomes. The authors demonstrate that as an alternative to MPR, the Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute's Rx To Go in-house pharmacy offers value; it uses a multifaceted approach to comprehensively evaluate the services that specialty oncology pharmacies provide to patients with cancer who are being treated with oral oncolytics.
医药福利管理公司使用药物持有率(MPR)等指标作为评估专科药房的绩效/质量指标,并评估直接和间接薪酬追回费用。大量证据表明,衡量 MPR 与患者接受口服癌症治疗药物期间的体验不相关,也不能准确反映他们的临床结果。作者证明,作为 MPR 的替代方案,佛罗里达癌症专家和研究所的 Rx To Go 内部药房提供了价值;它采用多方面的方法来全面评估为接受口服癌症治疗药物的癌症患者提供的专科肿瘤药房服务。