Centre de recherche du Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'Île-de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; École d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Centre de recherche du Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'Île-de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Centre de recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Département de psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J Neurol Sci. 2022 Oct 15;441:120377. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120377. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
Diffusion imaging (DWI) is considered an optimal technique to detect hyperacute cerebral ischemia and has thus enriched the clinical management of patients with suspected stroke. Researchers have taken this technique beyond with Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)-extracted measures, which have been proposed as biomarkers of stroke progression. A large body of literature report on the correlates between pathophysiological events, such as cytotoxic and vasogenic edema, and diffusion changes in the brain. However, a unified picture of these changes, and their exploration as stroke pathology progression biomarkers, remains to be done. We present here a narrative review on the different pathophysiological events underlying stroke from onset until late subacute stages and its relation to different brain edema forms. Studies included in this review used either DWI and/or DTI analysis in hyperacute (<24 h), acute (1-7 days), early subacute (7-30 days) and/or late subacute (1-6 months) phase of stroke, including human and animal models. Our conclusions are that diffusion measures should be considered as a potential proxy measure for stroke neuroinflammation status, specially in early stages of the disease. Furthermore, we suggest that the choice of diffusion measures and the interpretation of their changes, in both research and clinical settings, need to be linked to the different stroke phases to account correctly for the progression, and eventual resolution, of neuroinflammation.
扩散成像(DWI)被认为是检测超急性脑缺血的最佳技术,从而丰富了疑似中风患者的临床管理。研究人员已经将该技术扩展到弥散张量成像(DTI)提取的测量中,这些测量已被提出作为中风进展的生物标志物。大量文献报告了病理生理事件(如细胞毒性和血管源性水肿)与脑扩散变化之间的相关性。然而,这些变化及其作为中风病理进展生物标志物的探索仍然有待完成。我们在这里呈现了一篇关于从发病到晚期亚急性期的不同病理生理事件及其与不同脑水肿形式的关系的叙述性综述。本综述中纳入的研究在中风的超急性期(<24 小时)、急性期(1-7 天)、早期亚急性期(7-30 天)和/或晚期亚急性期(1-6 个月)中使用了 DWI 和/或 DTI 分析,包括人类和动物模型。我们的结论是,扩散测量值可被视为中风神经炎症状态的潜在替代指标,特别是在疾病的早期阶段。此外,我们建议在研究和临床环境中,扩散测量值的选择及其变化的解释需要与不同的中风阶段相关联,以正确解释神经炎症的进展和最终的缓解。