• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创食管切除术后的生活质量:一项横断面研究。

Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Van Daele Elke, Stuer Eefje, Vanommeslaeghe Hanne, Ceelen Wim, Pattyn Piet, Pape Eva

机构信息

Department of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Medicine and Health Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2022;39(4):153-161. doi: 10.1159/000526832. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1159/000526832
PMID:36049474
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgery remains essential in the curative treatment of esophageal cancer (EC), but it is known for its high morbidity and impaired health-related QoL. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was introduced to reduce surgical trauma and improve QoL.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate long-term HRQoL after MIE in comparison with the general population. HRQoL assessment was based on three questionnaires: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core 30 (QLQ-C30, version 3), the EORTC QLQ Oesophago Gastric 25 (QLQ-OG25), and the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form 34 (SCNS-SF34). Results were compared to a healthy reference population.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty eligible MIE patients were identified, of whom met the inclusion criteria, and 49 completed all questionnaires. Patients reported a significantly better mean score on the global health status and QoL than the healthy reference population (71.5 ± 15.1 vs. 66.1 ± 21.7; p = 0.016). However, patients scored significantly worse about functioning (physical, role, and social) (p < 0.05), fatigue (p = 0.021), eating, dysphagia, pain and discomfort, reflux, appetite loss, weight loss, coughing, and taste (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: EC survivors can reach a high global health status and QoL at least 1 year after MIE, despite long-term functional, nutritional, and gastrointestinal complaints. Patients provided written informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ghent University Hospital (identifier: ID B670201940737).

摘要

引言

手术仍是食管癌(EC)根治性治疗的重要手段,但其以高发病率和健康相关生活质量受损而闻名。微创食管切除术(MIE)的引入旨在减少手术创伤并改善生活质量。

方法

本横断面研究旨在评估MIE术后与普通人群相比的长期健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。HRQoL评估基于三份问卷:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)核心30问卷(QLQ-C30,第3版)、EORTC食管胃25问卷(QLQ-OG25)和支持性护理需求调查简表34(SCNS-SF34)。将结果与健康对照人群进行比较。

结果

确定了140例符合条件的MIE患者,其中符合纳入标准,49例完成了所有问卷。患者报告的总体健康状况和生活质量平均得分显著高于健康对照人群(71.5±15.1对66.1±21.7;p = 0.016)。然而,患者在功能(身体、角色和社会)方面得分显著更差(p < 0.05),疲劳(p = 0.021)、进食、吞咽困难、疼痛和不适、反流、食欲减退、体重减轻、咳嗽和味觉方面得分也显著更差(p < 0.001)。

讨论/结论:尽管存在长期的功能、营养和胃肠道问题,但EC幸存者在MIE术后至少1年可达到较高的总体健康状况和生活质量。患者提供了书面知情同意书,研究方案获得根特大学医院伦理委员会批准(标识符:ID B670201940737)。

相似文献

1
Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study.微创食管切除术后的生活质量:一项横断面研究。
Dig Surg. 2022;39(4):153-161. doi: 10.1159/000526832. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
2
Minimally Invasive Thoracoabdominal Esophagectomy Is Superior to Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in Terms of Health-Related Quality of Life.微创胸腹联合食管切除术在健康相关生活质量方面优于微创胃切除术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Mar;31(3):306-313. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0509. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
3
Short-Term Outcomes and Quality of Life Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in a Tertiary Care Center in Southern India.印度南部一家三级医疗中心微创食管切除术后的短期结局和生活质量
Cureus. 2023 Nov 22;15(11):e49245. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49245. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Long-term quality of life after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌行艾弗·刘易斯食管切除术后的长期生活质量
World J Surg. 2014 Sep;38(9):2345-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2576-1.
5
Reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction in the posterior mediastinum for esophageal cancer: original questionnaire and EORTC QLQ-C30 survey.食管癌经后纵隔胃代食管重建食管切除术后的反流:原始问卷及欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷C30调查
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Jul 1;31(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy001.
6
Long-term health-related quality of life for disease-free esophageal cancer patients.无病食管癌患者的长期健康相关生活质量。
World J Surg. 2011 Aug;35(8):1853-60. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1123-6.
7
Modified McKeown traditional McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy in improving short-term efficacy and the quality of life of esophageal cancers: a retrospective comparative cohort study.改良McKeown术与传统McKeown术及微创食管切除术对提高食管癌短期疗效和生活质量的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Aug;13(4):1579-1588. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-712.
8
Long-term outcome in patients operated with hybrid esophagectomy for esophageal cancer - a cohort study.杂交食管癌根治术治疗食管癌患者的长期疗效——一项队列研究。
Acta Oncol. 2020 Jul;59(7):859-865. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1750694. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
Long-term quality of life after hybrid robot-assisted and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single center: a comparative analysis.单中心机器人辅助与开放 Ivor Lewis 食管癌根治术的长期生活质量比较:一项对照分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 11;409(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03310-2.
10
Long-term quality of life after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up.胃上提食管切除术后的长期生活质量
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;117(5):970-976. doi: 10.1002/jso.24995. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the impact of minimally invasive esophagectomy on quality of life and functional prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective comparative study.微创食管癌切除术对食管鳞状细胞癌患者生活质量和功能预后的影响分析:一项回顾性比较研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 May 30;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13019-025-03485-9.
2
Analysis of the Trends and Influencing Factors for Postoperative Cough in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.基于患者报告结局的食管癌患者术后咳嗽趋势及影响因素分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6691-6698. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15413-7. Epub 2024 May 18.
3
Long-term quality of life after hybrid robot-assisted and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single center: a comparative analysis.
单中心机器人辅助与开放 Ivor Lewis 食管癌根治术的长期生活质量比较:一项对照分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 11;409(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03310-2.
4
Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Is Safe and Cost Equivalent Compared to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in a Tertiary Referral Center.在三级转诊中心,与微创食管切除术相比,机器人辅助的Ivor Lewis食管切除术安全且成本相当。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 25;16(1):112. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010112.