Suppr超能文献

马凡综合征中血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂:随机试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析。

Angiotensin receptor blockers and β blockers in Marfan syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials.

机构信息

The Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

MRC Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2022 Sep 10;400(10355):822-831. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01534-3. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and β blockers are widely used in the treatment of Marfan syndrome to try to reduce the rate of progressive aortic root enlargement characteristic of this condition, but their separate and joint effects are uncertain. We aimed to determine these effects in a collaborative individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials of these treatments.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, we identified relevant trials of patients with Marfan syndrome by systematically searching MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from database inception to Nov 2, 2021. Trials were eligible if they involved a randomised comparison of an ARB versus control or an ARB versus β blocker. We used individual patient data from patients with no prior aortic surgery to estimate the effects of: ARB versus control (placebo or open control); ARB versus β blocker; and indirectly, β blocker versus control. The primary endpoint was the annual rate of change of body surface area-adjusted aortic root dimension Z score, measured at the sinuses of Valsalva.

FINDINGS

We identified ten potentially eligible trials including 1836 patients from our search, from which seven trials and 1442 patients were eligible for inclusion in our main analyses. Four trials involving 676 eligible participants compared ARB with control. During a median follow-up of 3 years, allocation to ARB approximately halved the annual rate of change in the aortic root Z score (mean annual increase 0·07 [SE 0·02] ARB vs 0·13 [SE 0·02] control; absolute difference -0·07 [95% CI -0·12 to -0·01]; p=0·012). Prespecified secondary subgroup analyses showed that the effects of ARB were particularly large in those with pathogenic variants in fibrillin-1, compared with those without such variants (heterogeneity p=0·0050), and there was no evidence to suggest that the effect of ARB varied with β-blocker use (heterogeneity p=0·54). Three trials involving 766 eligible participants compared ARBs with β blockers. During a median follow-up of 3 years, the annual change in the aortic root Z score was similar in the two groups (annual increase -0·08 [SE 0·03] in ARB groups vs -0·11 [SE 0·02] in β-blocker groups; absolute difference 0·03 [95% CI -0·05 to 0·10]; p=0·48). Thus, indirectly, the difference in the annual change in the aortic root Z score between β blockers and control was -0·09 (95% CI -0·18 to 0·00; p=0·042).

INTERPRETATION

In people with Marfan syndrome and no previous aortic surgery, ARBs reduced the rate of increase of the aortic root Z score by about one half, including among those taking a β blocker. The effects of β blockers were similar to those of ARBs. Assuming additivity, combination therapy with both ARBs and β blockers from the time of diagnosis would provide even greater reductions in the rate of aortic enlargement than either treatment alone, which, if maintained over a number of years, would be expected to lead to a delay in the need for aortic surgery.

FUNDING

Marfan Foundation, the Oxford British Heart Foundation Centre for Research Excellence, and the UK Medical Research Council.

摘要

背景

血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)和β受体阻滞剂广泛用于马凡综合征的治疗,试图降低这种疾病特征性的主动脉根部进行性扩张的发生率,但它们的单独和联合作用尚不确定。我们旨在通过对这些治疗的随机试验的合作个体患者数据荟萃分析来确定这些作用。

方法

在这项荟萃分析中,我们通过系统地搜索 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL,从数据库成立到 2021 年 11 月 2 日,确定了马凡综合征患者的相关试验。如果试验涉及 ARB 与对照或 ARB 与β受体阻滞剂的随机比较,则符合入选条件。我们使用无先前主动脉手术的患者的个体患者数据来估计以下方面的影响:ARB 与对照(安慰剂或开放对照);ARB 与β受体阻滞剂;以及间接地,β受体阻滞剂与对照。主要终点是在 Valsalva 窦测量的体表面积校正的主动脉根部直径 Z 分数的年变化率。

发现

我们从搜索中确定了十项潜在的合格试验,其中包括 1836 名患者,其中七项试验和 1442 名患者符合我们主要分析的入选条件。四项涉及 676 名合格参与者的试验将 ARB 与对照进行了比较。在中位数为 3 年的随访期间,分配到 ARB 组的患者主动脉根部 Z 分数的年增长率大约减半(平均年增长率 0.07[SE 0.02]ARB 与 0.13[SE 0.02]对照;绝对差异 -0.07[95%CI -0.12 至 -0.01];p=0.012)。预先指定的次要亚组分析表明,在纤维蛋白原 1 存在致病性变异的患者中,ARB 的作用特别大,而在没有此类变异的患者中则不然(异质性 p=0.0050),并且没有证据表明 ARB 的作用随β受体阻滞剂的使用而变化(异质性 p=0.54)。三项涉及 766 名合格参与者的试验将 ARBs 与β受体阻滞剂进行了比较。在中位数为 3 年的随访期间,两组患者的主动脉根部 Z 分数的年变化相似(ARB 组的年增长率为 -0.08[SE 0.03],β受体阻滞剂组为 -0.11[SE 0.02];绝对差异 0.03[95%CI -0.05 至 0.10];p=0.48)。因此,间接地,β受体阻滞剂和对照之间主动脉根部 Z 分数年变化的差异为 -0.09(95%CI -0.18 至 0.00;p=0.042)。

解释

在没有先前主动脉手术的马凡综合征患者中,ARB 将主动脉根部 Z 分数的增长率降低了约一半,包括服用β受体阻滞剂的患者。β受体阻滞剂的作用与 ARB 相似。假设加性,从诊断开始,ARB 和β受体阻滞剂联合治疗将比单独治疗更能降低主动脉扩张的速度,如果这种治疗持续数年,预计将延迟主动脉手术的需要。

资金

马凡基金会、牛津英国心脏基金会卓越研究中心和英国医学研究理事会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3658/9631112/6db2ea32fafc/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验