• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯沙坦治疗儿童隐性遗传性营养不良性大疱性表皮松解症的安全性和耐受性(REFLECT):一项开放标签、单臂、1/2期试验。

Safety and tolerability of losartan to treat recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa in children (REFLECT): an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial.

作者信息

Kiritsi Dimitra, Schauer Franziska, Gewert Stella, Reineker Katja, Reimer-Taschenbrecker Antonia, Schwieger-Briel Agnes, Ott Hagen, Schmoor Claudia, Grishina Olga, Murrell Dedee, Stiller Brigitte, Zahn Tobias, Nyström Alexander, Bruckner-Tuderman Leena

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Medical Center- University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

First Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Oct 30;77:102900. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102900. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102900
PMID:39539991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11558043/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a skin fragility disorder characterised by life-long mechanically induced skin blistering, fibrosis-driven pseudosyndactyly, and multi-organ involvement. Preclinical studies have suggested mitigated progression by angiotensin II type I receptor blockade through losartan. We aimed to determine the safety and tolerability of systemic losartan treatment among children with RDEB, and to obtain initial data on its clinical benefit.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial at the Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Germany. Children with molecularly-confirmed RDEB, aged 2-16 years (starting from the 25th month of life) were eligible. Key exclusion criteria comprised anaemia with haemoglobin <8 g/dl; hypotension (defined as age-related systolic blood pressure under the 5th percentile); cardiologic contraindications, requirement for any medications that are likely to cause interactions with losartan; renal artery stenosis or renal insufficiency with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min; severe liver failure; severe, untreated electrolyte disturbances; history of cancer or chronic viral infections; hypersensitivity to losartan or any of the excipients and known or persistent abuse of medication, drugs, or alcohol. Treatment duration with losartan comprised 10 months, encompassing 16 weeks up-dosing of losartan, 24 weeks full dose losartan (final target dose of 1.4 mg/kg), and 4 weeks losartan tapering, followed by 12 weeks follow-up without losartan. The primary endpoint was occurrence of a serious safety concern, defined as one of the following side effects of losartan: clinically relevant severe hypotension, immediate hypersensitivity reactions to the drug or clinical relevant severe hypo- and hyperkalaemia. EB-specific scores (the EBDASI activity and damage score, Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity Score (BEBS)) and other clinical outcome parameters were evaluated at five clinical visits as secondary outcomes: pain (Wong-Baker FACES Scale for pain), quality of life (Quality Of Life in EB [QOLEB] questionnaire and Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index [CDLQI]), itch (Itch Assessment Scale for the Paediatric Burn Patients), dysphagia (Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire-day 30 [MDQ-30]), pseudosyndactyly progression (our own morphometric scoring instrument), and hand function (Score of Colville and Terrill). All analyses (safety and efficacy) were performed in the safety population, defined as participants who received at least one dose of trial medication with losartan. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2015-003670-32.

FINDINGS

Between Jul 28, 2017, and Feb 12, 2021, 29 children were enrolled. Of those 27 received the full treatment. Losartan was well tolerated, no treatment-related severe complications leading to a serious safety concern occurred. The patients revealed improvement in the RDEB clinical scores, namely a mean reduction at week 40 of -7.36 points (95%-CI: -16.13 to 1.41) in the EBDASI activity score and -10.50 points (95%-CI: -20.81 to -0.19) in the EBDASI damage score, while the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index rose by 2.64 points (95%-CI: -4.55 to -0.90). Similar to the EBDASI score, the BEBS showed a mean reduction of -3 points, 95%-CI: -0.21 to -5,79, P = 0.036). In the Wong-Baker FACES Scale for Pain an improvement of at least one level was identified for 9 of 28 patients between baseline and at month 9 (95%-CI: 15.9%-52.4%; P = 0.57). Regarding the Quality of Life in EB Score, five of 28 patients showed an improvement in the total scale of at least one level at month 9 (95%-CI: 6.1%-36.9%; P = 0.71). With the Itch assessment scale for the paediatric burn patients an improvement of at least one level could be observed in 12 of 28 patients (95%-CI: 24.5%-62.8%; P = 0.24). The MDQ-30 showed no relevant difference at 9 months after treatment start, as compared to baseline. We observed improvement of finger span with our own morphometric scoring instrument of pseudosyndactyly progression, revealing an increase of the maximal distance between thumb and index finger at month 9 by 6.92 mm, 95%-CI [3.48, 10.37] P = 0.0009. With the Hand function assessment score of Colville and Terrill, an improvement of at least one level was documented for 3 of 28 patients, i.e., 10.7% (95%-CI: 2.3%-28.2%; P = 0.63).

INTERPRETATION

Our results suggest that losartan was well tolerated by children with RDEB, and provide preliminary evidence that it may reduce disease burden. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer durations is needed to establish the treatment's long-term efficacy and safety.

FUNDING

Debra International, the Department of Dermatology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg (Berta-Ottenstein Advanced Clinician Scientist Program of the Medical Faculty), and the German Research Foundation.

摘要

背景

隐性营养不良性大疱性表皮松解症(RDEB)是一种皮肤脆性疾病,其特征为终生因机械作用导致皮肤水疱形成、纤维化驱动的假性并指以及多器官受累。临床前研究表明,通过氯沙坦阻断血管紧张素II 1型受体可减缓疾病进展。我们旨在确定氯沙坦全身治疗在RDEB患儿中的安全性和耐受性,并获取其临床获益的初步数据。

方法

我们在德国弗莱堡大学医学中心进行了一项开放标签、单臂、1/2期试验。年龄在2至16岁(从出生后第25个月起)且分子确诊为RDEB的儿童符合条件。主要排除标准包括:血红蛋白<8 g/dl的贫血;低血压(定义为年龄相关的收缩压低于第5百分位数);心脏疾病禁忌证;需要使用任何可能与氯沙坦发生相互作用的药物;肾动脉狭窄或肌酐清除率<30 ml/min的肾功能不全;严重肝功能衰竭;严重的、未经治疗的电解质紊乱;癌症或慢性病毒感染史;对氯沙坦或任何辅料过敏以及已知或持续滥用药物、毒品或酒精。氯沙坦的治疗持续时间为10个月,包括16周的氯沙坦剂量递增期、24周的氯沙坦全剂量期(最终目标剂量为1.4 mg/kg)以及4周的氯沙坦减量期。之后为12周的无氯沙坦随访期。主要终点是出现严重安全问题,定义为氯沙坦的以下副作用之一:临床相关的严重低血压、对药物的即刻过敏反应或临床相关的严重低钾血症和高钾血症。在五次临床访视时评估EB特异性评分(EBDASI活动和损伤评分、伯明翰大疱性表皮松解症严重程度评分(BEBS))以及其他临床结局参数作为次要结局:疼痛(采用Wong-Baker面部表情疼痛量表)、生活质量(采用EB生活质量[QOLEB]问卷和儿童皮肤病生活质量指数[CDLQI])、瘙痒(采用小儿烧伤患者瘙痒评估量表)、吞咽困难(采用梅奥吞咽问卷-第30天[MDQ-30])、假性并指进展(我们自己的形态计量评分工具)以及手部功能(科尔维尔和特里尔评分)。所有分析(安全性和有效性)均在安全人群中进行,安全人群定义为接受至少一剂含氯沙坦试验药物的参与者。本试验已在欧洲临床试验数据库(EudraCT)注册,注册号为2015-003670-32。

结果

在2017年7月28日至2021年2月12日期间,共纳入29名儿童。其中27名接受了全程治疗。氯沙坦耐受性良好,未发生导致严重安全问题的与治疗相关的严重并发症。患者的RDEB临床评分有所改善,具体如下:在第40周时,EBDASI活动评分平均降低-7.36分(95%置信区间:-16.13至1.41),EBDASI损伤评分平均降低-10.50分(95%置信区间:-20.81至-0.19),而儿童皮肤病生活质量指数上升了2.64分(95%置信区间:-4.55至-0.90)。与EBDASI评分类似,BEBS平均降低-3分,95%置信区间:-0.21至-5.79,P = 0.036)。在Wong-Baker面部表情疼痛量表中,28名患者中有9名在基线至第9个月期间疼痛至少改善了一个等级(95%置信区间:15.9%-52.4%;P = 0.57)。关于EB生活质量评分,28名患者中有5名在第9个月时总评分至少改善了一个等级(95%置信区间:6.1%-36.9%;P = 0.71)。在小儿烧伤患者瘙痒评估量表中,28名患者中有12名至少改善了一个等级(95%置信区间:24.5%-62.8%;P = 0.24)。治疗开始后9个月时,MDQ-30与基线相比无显著差异。我们使用自己的假性并指进展形态计量评分工具观察到指间距有所改善,在第9个月时拇指与食指之间的最大距离增加了6.92 mm,95%置信区间为[3.48, 10.37],P = 0.0009。在科尔维尔和特里尔的手部功能评估评分中,28名患者中有3名记录到至少改善了一个等级,即10.7%(95%置信区间:2.3%-28.2%;P = 0.63)。

解读

我们的结果表明,RDEB患儿对氯沙坦耐受性良好,并提供了初步证据表明其可能减轻疾病负担。需要进行更大样本量和更长疗程的进一步研究,以确定该治疗方法的长期疗效和安全性。

资助

德布拉国际、弗莱堡大学医学中心皮肤科(医学院的贝塔 - 奥滕斯坦高级临床科学家项目)以及德国研究基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/a22056a219f8/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/a3ba5b81f198/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/de6c78fb1736/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/eff2c43d4da4/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/d72cceb2c879/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/a22056a219f8/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/a3ba5b81f198/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/de6c78fb1736/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/eff2c43d4da4/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/d72cceb2c879/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96f6/11558043/a22056a219f8/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and tolerability of losartan to treat recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa in children (REFLECT): an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial.氯沙坦治疗儿童隐性遗传性营养不良性大疱性表皮松解症的安全性和耐受性(REFLECT):一项开放标签、单臂、1/2期试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Oct 30;77:102900. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102900. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Hindi translation and validation of quality of life score in Indian patients with epidermolysis bullosa; and its correlation with the clinical severity assessment scores: A cross-sectional study.印度大疱性表皮松解症患者生活质量评分的印地语翻译和验证; 及其与临床严重程度评估评分的相关性: 一项横断面研究。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2022 Mar-Apr;88(2):177-183. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_31_20.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Intravenous gentamicin therapy induces functional type VII collagen in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: an open-label clinical trial.静脉注射庆大霉素治疗隐性营养不良型大疱性表皮松解症患者诱导功能性 VII 型胶原产生:一项开放性临床试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jul 16;191(2):267-274. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae063.
5
A comparison study of outcome measures for epidermolysis bullosa: Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) and the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes of Research for Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB).大疱性表皮松解症结局指标的比较研究:大疱性表皮松解症疾病活动与瘢痕指数(EBDASI)和大疱性表皮松解症研究临床结局评分工具(iscorEB)。
JAAD Int. 2021 Jan 21;2:134-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2020.12.007. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa营养不良性大疱性表皮松解症
7
Losartan treatment improves recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A case series.氯沙坦治疗改善隐性遗传性营养不良性大疱性表皮松解症:病例系列
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Jul;35(7):e15515. doi: 10.1111/dth.15515. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
8
Development, reliability, and validity of a novel Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI).新型大疱性表皮松解症活动和瘢痕指数(EBDASI)的制定、可靠性和有效性。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jan;70(1):89-97.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.041.
9
Clinical trial of ABCB5+ mesenchymal stem cells for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.ABC B5+间充质干细胞治疗隐性营养不良型大疱性表皮松解症的临床试验。
JCI Insight. 2021 Nov 22;6(22):e151922. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.151922.
10
Long-term safety and efficacy of gene-corrected autologous keratinocyte grafts for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.基因校正自体角质形成细胞移植治疗隐性营养不良型大疱性表皮松解症的长期安全性和疗效。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Oct 17;17(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02546-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Progress in skin gene therapy: From the inside and out.皮肤基因治疗的进展:由内而外
Mol Ther. 2025 May 7;33(5):2065-2081. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.03.017. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
2
The Role of Fibroblasts in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Pathogenesis and Current Treatment Approaches.成纤维细胞在营养不良性大疱性表皮松解症发病机制中的作用及当前治疗方法
JID Innov. 2025 Feb 4;5(3):100353. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2025.100353. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Trial of Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC) for Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.贝雷单抗基因治疗(B-VEC)治疗营养不良型大疱性表皮松解症的临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 15;387(24):2211-2219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206663.
2
Periostin overexpression in scleroderma cardiac tissue and its utility as a marker for disease complications.硬皮病心脏组织中骨膜蛋白的过表达及其作为疾病并发症标志物的用途。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Nov 11;24(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02943-2.
3
Long-term follow-up of epidermolysis bullosa in real practice shows stability of the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index and improvement with some off-label therapies.
在实际临床中对大疱性表皮松解症的长期随访显示,大疱性表皮松解症疾病活动和瘢痕指数具有稳定性,且一些非标签疗法可带来改善。
JAAD Int. 2022 Sep 5;9:105-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.07.008. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Losartan ameliorates renal interstitial fibrosis through metabolic pathway and Smurfs-TGF-β/Smad.氯沙坦通过代谢途径和 Smurfs-TGF-β/Smad 改善肾间质纤维化。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2022 May;149:112931. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112931. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
Angiotensin receptor blockers and β blockers in Marfan syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials.马凡综合征中血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂:随机试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2022 Sep 10;400(10355):822-831. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01534-3. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
Losartan as therapy for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: Report of three cases.氯沙坦治疗隐性遗传性营养不良型大疱性表皮松解症:3例报告。
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Sep;35(9):e15678. doi: 10.1111/dth.15678. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Losartan treatment improves recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A case series.氯沙坦治疗改善隐性遗传性营养不良性大疱性表皮松解症:病例系列
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Jul;35(7):e15515. doi: 10.1111/dth.15515. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
8
In vivo topical gene therapy for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a phase 1 and 2 trial.体内局部基因治疗隐性营养不良型大疱性表皮松解症:一项 1 期和 2 期临床试验。
Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):780-788. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01737-y. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
9
Comparative therapeutic strategies for preventing aortic rupture in a mouse model of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.血管型埃勒斯-当洛斯综合征小鼠模型中预防主动脉破裂的治疗策略比较。
PLoS Genet. 2022 Mar 4;18(3):e1010059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010059. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Pro-inflammatory immunity supports fibrosis advancement in epidermolysis bullosa: intervention with Ang-(1-7).促炎免疫支持大疱性表皮松解症纤维化进展:血管紧张素 (1-7) 的干预作用。
EMBO Mol Med. 2021 Oct 7;13(10):e14392. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202114392. Epub 2021 Aug 30.