Chung-Yeon Korean Medicine Clinic, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06224, Republic of Korea.
Department of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, Dong-eui University College of Korean Medicine, Busanjin-gu, Busan 47340, Republic of Korea.
J Integr Med. 2022 Nov;20(6):514-523. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
Acupotomy is a modern acupuncture method that includes modern surgical methods. Since acupotomy is relatively more invasive than filiform acupuncture treatment, it is important to establish the safety profile of this practice. To justify further large-scale prospective observational studies, this preliminary study was performed to assess the feasibility of the approach and investigate the safety profile and factors potentially associated with adverse events (AEs).
This was a prospective pilot study that assessed the feasibility of a large-scale forthcoming safety study on acupotomy treatment in a real-world setting. The feasibility (call response rate, drop-out rate, response rate for each variable and recruitment per month) and safety profile (incidence, type, severity and causality of AEs, and factors potentially associated with AEs) were measured.
A total of 28 participants joined the study from January to May 2018. A follow-up assessment was achieved in 258 (1185 treatment points) out of 261 sessions (1214 treatment points). The response rate via telephone on the day after treatment was 87.3%. There were 8 systemic AEs in all the sessions (8/258; 3.11%) and 27 local AEs on the total points treated (27/1185; 2.28%). Severe AEs did not occur. Total AE and local AE occurrence were associated with blade width and the number of needle stimulations per treatment point.
The findings suggest that it could be feasible to analyze the safety of acupotomy in a real-world setting. Moreover, the primary data on some relevant AEs could be determined. We are planning large-scale prospective studies based on these findings.
Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) KCT0002849 (https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/11487).
针刀疗法是一种现代针灸方法,包含现代手术方法。由于针刀疗法比毫针疗法更具侵入性,因此确定这种治疗方法的安全性很重要。为了进一步开展大规模前瞻性观察研究,本初步研究旨在评估该方法的可行性,并研究其安全性概况和与不良事件(AE)相关的潜在因素。
这是一项前瞻性试点研究,旨在评估在真实环境中进行针刀治疗的大型安全性研究的可行性。测量了可行性(电话应答率、脱落率、每个变量的应答率和每月招募人数)和安全性概况(AE 的发生率、类型、严重程度和因果关系,以及与 AE 相关的潜在因素)。
2018 年 1 月至 5 月期间,共有 28 名参与者加入了这项研究。在 261 次治疗(1214 个治疗点)中,有 258 次(1185 个治疗点)进行了随访评估。治疗后第二天通过电话进行应答的比例为 87.3%。在所有治疗中,共有 8 例全身性 AE(8/258;3.11%)和 1185 个治疗点中 27 例局部 AE(27/1185;2.28%)。未发生严重 AE。总 AE 和局部 AE 的发生与针刀的宽度和每个治疗点的针刺激数有关。
研究结果表明,在真实环境中分析针刀疗法的安全性是可行的。此外,还可以确定一些相关 AE 的初步数据。我们正在根据这些发现计划开展大规模前瞻性研究。
临床研究信息服务(CRIS)KCT0002849(https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/11487)。