• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估颅内压监测的有创和无创脑自动调节方法。

Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation Using Invasive and Noninvasive Methods of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.

机构信息

Cerebrovascular Center, Neurologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44102, USA.

Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2023 Jun;38(3):591-599. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01585-1. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s12028-022-01585-1
PMID:36050535
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulse amplitude index (PAx), a descriptor of cerebrovascular reactivity, correlates the changes of the pulse amplitude of the intracranial pressure (ICP) waveform (AMP) with changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP). AMP relies on cerebrovascular compliance, which is modulated by the state of the cerebrovascular reactivity. PAx can aid in prognostication after acute brain injuries as a tool for the assessment of cerebral autoregulation and could potentially tailor individual management; however, invasive measurements are required for its calculation. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between noninvasive PAx (nPAx) derived from a novel noninvasive device for ICP monitoring and PAx derived from gold standard invasive methods.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed invasive ICP (external ventricular drain) and non-invasive ICP (nICP), via mechanical extensometer (Brain4Care Corp.). Invasive and non-invasive ICP waveform morphology data was collected in adult patients with brain injury with arterial blood pressure monitoring. The time series from all signals were first treated to remove movement artifacts. PAx and nPAx were calculated as the moving correlation coefficients of 10-s averages of AMP or non-invasive AMP (nAMP) and MAP. AMP/nAMP was determined by calculating the fundamental frequency amplitude of the ICP/nICP signal over a 10-s window, updated every 10-s. We then evaluated the relationship between invasive PAx and noninvasive nPAx using the methods of repeated-measures analysis to generate an estimate of the correlation coefficient and its 95% confidence interval (CI). The agreement between the two methods was assessed using the Bland-Altman test.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were identified. The median age was 53.5 years (interquartile range 40-70), and intracranial hemorrhage (84%) was the most common etiology. Twenty-one (87.5%) patients underwent mechanical ventilation, and 60% were sedated with a median Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 (7-15). Mean PAx was 0.0296 ± 0.331, and nPAx was 0.0171 ± 0.332. The correlation between PAx and nPAx was strong (R = 0.70, p < 0.0005, 95% CI 0.687-0.717). Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement, with a bias of - 0.018 (95% CI - 0.026 to - 0.01) and a localized regression trend line that did not deviate from 0.

CONCLUSIONS

PAx can be calculated by conventional and noninvasive ICP monitoring in a statistically significant evaluation with strong agreement. Further study of the applications of this clinical tool is warranted, with the goal of early therapeutic intervention to improve neurologic outcomes following acute brain injuries.

摘要

背景

脉搏幅度指数(PAx)是脑血管反应性的一个描述符,它将颅内压(ICP)波形的脉搏幅度变化与平均动脉压(MAP)的变化联系起来。AMP 依赖于脑血管顺应性,而脑血管顺应性则受脑血管反应性状态的调节。PAx 可以作为评估脑自动调节的工具,帮助预测急性脑损伤后的预后,并可能针对个体进行管理;然而,它的计算需要有创测量。我们的目的是评估从新型非侵入性 ICP 监测设备中获得的非侵入性 PAx(nPAx)与从金标准有创方法中获得的 PAx 之间的关系。

方法

我们回顾性分析了有创 ICP(外部脑室引流)和非侵入性 ICP(nICP),通过机械应变计(Brain4Care 公司)。在有动脉血压监测的脑损伤成年患者中收集了有创和非侵入性 ICP 波形形态数据。所有信号的时间序列首先经过处理以去除运动伪影。PAx 和 nPAx 是通过计算 10 秒平均 AMP 或非侵入性 AMP(nAMP)和 MAP 的移动相关系数来计算的。AMP/nAMP 通过在 10 秒窗口内计算 ICP/nICP 信号的基频幅度来确定,每 10 秒更新一次。然后,我们使用重复测量分析的方法评估了有创 PAx 和非侵入性 nPAx 之间的关系,生成相关系数及其 95%置信区间(CI)的估计值。使用 Bland-Altman 检验评估两种方法之间的一致性。

结果

确定了 24 名患者。中位年龄为 53.5 岁(四分位间距 40-70),颅内出血(84%)是最常见的病因。21 名(87.5%)患者接受了机械通气,60%患者接受了镇静治疗,格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为 8 分(7-15 分)。平均 PAx 为 0.0296±0.331,nPAx 为 0.0171±0.332。PAx 和 nPAx 之间的相关性很强(R=0.70,p<0.0005,95%CI 0.687-0.717)。Bland-Altman 分析显示有很好的一致性,偏差为-0.018(95%CI-0.026 至-0.01),局部回归趋势线没有偏离 0。

结论

PAx 可以通过常规和非侵入性 ICP 监测以具有统计学意义的评估进行计算,并且具有很强的一致性。需要进一步研究这种临床工具的应用,以期通过早期治疗干预改善急性脑损伤后的神经预后。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation Using Invasive and Noninvasive Methods of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.评估颅内压监测的有创和无创脑自动调节方法。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Jun;38(3):591-599. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01585-1. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
2
Validation of non-invasive cerebrovascular pressure reactivity and pulse amplitude reactivity indices in traumatic brain injury.颅脑创伤患者无创性脑血管压力反应性和脉搏波振幅反应性指数的验证。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Feb;162(2):337-344. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04169-9. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
3
Pulsatile intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后的脉动颅内压和脑自动调节。
Neurocrit Care. 2011 Dec;15(3):379-86. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9553-4.
4
Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity using pulse waveform of intracranial pressure.使用颅内压脉搏波形连续监测脑血管反应性。
Neurocrit Care. 2012 Aug;17(1):67-76. doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9687-z.
5
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
6
Usability of Noninvasive Counterparts of Traditional Autoregulation Indices in Traumatic Brain Injury.无创性传统自动调节指数在创伤性脑损伤中的可用性。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;131:163-166. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_33.
7
Validation of Intracranial Pressure-Derived Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices against the Lower Limit of Autoregulation, Part II: Experimental Model of Arterial Hypotension.颅内压衍生脑血管反应性指数对自动调节下限的验证,第二部分:动脉低血压的实验模型。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Dec 1;35(23):2812-2819. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5604. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
8
ICP Versus Laser Doppler Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices to Assess Brain Autoregulatory Capacity.颅内压与激光多普勒脑血流反应指数评估脑自动调节能力。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Apr;28(2):194-202. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0472-x.
9
Relationship Between Measures of Cerebrovascular Reactivity and Intracranial Lesion Progression in Acute TBI Patients: an Exploratory Analysis.急性颅脑损伤患者脑血管反应性测量与颅内病变进展的关系:探索性分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Apr;32(2):373-382. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00885-3.
10
Association of Outcomes with Model-Based Indices of Cerebral Autoregulation After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.儿童创伤性脑损伤后基于模型的脑自动调节指数与结局的相关性。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Dec;35(3):640-650. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01279-0. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Cerebrospinal Compensatory Zones Using a Noninvasive Approach.使用非侵入性方法探索脑脊液代偿区
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02320-2.
2
Clinical Performance of the Brain4care System for Noninvasive Detection of Intracranial Hypertension.用于无创检测颅内高压的Brain4care系统的临床性能
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02273-6.
3
Towards quantitative assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation in human neonates using ultrafast ultrasound imaging.利用超快超声成像对人类新生儿脑血管自动调节进行定量评估

本文引用的文献

1
Losing the dogmatic view of cerebral autoregulation.摒弃脑自动调节的教条观点。
Physiol Rep. 2021 Aug;9(15):e14982. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14982.
2
An Update on the COGiTATE Phase II Study: Feasibility and Safety of Targeting an Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure as a Patient-Tailored Therapy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.COGiTATE 二期研究更新:在严重创伤性脑损伤中靶向最佳脑灌注压作为患者定制治疗的可行性和安全性。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;131:143-147. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_29.
3
Fixed Compared With Autoregulation-Oriented Blood Pressure Thresholds After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 11;15(1):12374. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97292-w.
4
Validation of a Noninvasive Approach for Cerebrospinal Compliance Monitoring.一种用于脑脊液顺应性监测的非侵入性方法的验证
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb 7. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02205-w.
5
Machine learning approach for noninvasive intracranial pressure estimation using pulsatile cranial expansion waveforms.使用搏动性颅骨扩张波形进行无创颅内压估计的机器学习方法。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jan 26;8(1):57. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01463-y.
6
Evolving concepts in intracranial pressure monitoring - from traditional monitoring to precision medicine.颅内压监测的概念演变——从传统监测到精准医学
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Jan;22(1):e00507. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00507. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
7
An ultrasensitive multimodal intracranial pressure biotelemetric system enabled by exceptional point and iontronics.一种由临界点和离子电子学实现的超高灵敏多模态颅内压遥测系统。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 5;15(1):9557. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53836-8.
8
Noninvasive Method Using Mechanical Extensometer for the Estimation of Intracranial Compliance by Repeated Measures Agreement Analysis.使用机械引伸计通过重复测量一致性分析评估颅内顺应性的无创方法。
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr;42(2):465-473. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02102-2. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
9
Observational study of intracranial compliance analysis in neurologically healthy pediatric patients using a non-invasive device.使用非侵入性设备对神经健康的儿科患者进行颅内顺应性分析的观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 22;14(1):19482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69938-8.
10
Management of shunt dysfunction using noninvasive intracranial pressure waveform monitoring: illustrative case.使用无创颅内压波形监测管理分流功能障碍:病例说明
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2024 Mar 4;7(10). doi: 10.3171/CASE23437.
机械取栓治疗缺血性脑卒中后固定与自主调节导向血压阈值的比较。
Stroke. 2020 Mar;51(3):914-921. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026596. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
4
The STROBE guidelines.STROBE指南。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S31-S34. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18.
5
Prolonged monitoring of cerebral blood flow and autoregulation with diffuse correlation spectroscopy in neurocritical care patients.在神经重症监护患者中使用扩散相关光谱法对脑血流和自动调节进行长期监测。
Neurophotonics. 2018 Oct;5(4):045005. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.5.4.045005. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
Cerebral Autoregulation in Stroke.脑卒中的脑自动调节。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018 May 21;20(8):37. doi: 10.1007/s11883-018-0739-5.
7
Wavelet pressure reactivity index: a validation study.小波压力反应指数:一项验证研究。
J Physiol. 2018 Jul;596(14):2797-2809. doi: 10.1113/JP274708. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
8
Analysis of a Non-invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Method in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患者无创颅内压监测方法的分析
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2018;126:107-110. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_23.
9
Cerebral autoregulation monitoring in acute traumatic brain injury: what's the evidence?急性创伤性脑损伤的脑自动调节监测:有何证据?
Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 Aug;83(8):844-857. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12043-2. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Cerebral Autoregulation-oriented Therapy at the Bedside: A Comprehensive Review.床边脑自动调节导向治疗:综述
Anesthesiology. 2017 Jun;126(6):1187-1199. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001625.