Suppr超能文献

善政始于善言:为何负责任的人类组织研究需要改变语言。

Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language.

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Sep 1;23(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00823-7.

Abstract

The rise of precision medicine has led to an unprecedented focus on human biological material in biomedical research. In addition, rapid advances in stem cell technology, regenerative medicine and synthetic biology are leading to more complex human tissue structures and new applications with tremendous potential for medicine. While promising, these developments also raise several ethical and practical challenges which have been the subject of extensive academic debate. These debates have led to increasing calls for longitudinal governance arrangements between tissue providers and biobanks that go beyond the initial moment of obtaining consent, such as closer involvement of tissue providers in what happens to their tissue, and more active participatory approaches to the governance of biobanks. However, in spite of these calls, such measures are being adopted slowly in practice, and there remains a strong tendency to focus on the consent procedure as the tool for addressing the ethical challenges of contemporary biobanking. In this paper, we argue that one of the barriers to this transition is the dominant language pervading the field of human tissue research, in which the provision of tissue is phrased as a 'donation' or 'gift', and tissue providers are referred to as 'donors'. Because of the performative qualities of language, the effect of using 'donation' and 'donor' shapes a professional culture in which biobank participants are perceived as passive providers of tissue free from further considerations or entitlements. This hampers the kind of participatory approaches to governance that are deemed necessary to adequately address the ethical challenges currently faced in human tissue research. Rather than reinforcing this idea through language, we need to pave the way for the kind of participatory approaches to governance that are being extensively argued for by starting with the appropriate terminology.

摘要

精准医学的兴起使得生物医学研究前所未有地聚焦于人类生物材料。此外,干细胞技术、再生医学和合成生物学的快速发展正在导致更复杂的人类组织结构和具有巨大医学潜力的新应用。虽然这些发展前景广阔,但也带来了一些伦理和实际挑战,这些挑战一直是广泛学术辩论的主题。这些辩论促使人们越来越呼吁组织提供组织的人和生物库之间建立超越初始同意获取时刻的纵向治理安排,例如更密切地让组织提供者参与其组织的去向,并对生物库的治理采取更积极的参与式方法。然而,尽管有这些呼吁,但这些措施在实践中仍缓慢被采纳,并且仍然强烈倾向于将同意程序作为解决当代生物库伦理挑战的工具。在本文中,我们认为,阻碍这种转变的一个障碍是人类组织研究领域中占主导地位的语言,其中提供组织被表述为“捐赠”或“礼物”,组织提供者被称为“捐赠者”。由于语言的表现性特质,使用“捐赠”和“捐赠者”的效果塑造了一种专业文化,使生物库参与者被视为组织的被动提供者,无需进一步考虑或享有权利。这阻碍了被认为对于充分应对当前人类组织研究中面临的伦理挑战所必需的参与式治理方法。我们需要通过语言来强化这种观念,而不是通过语言来强化这种观念,而是需要通过从适当的术语开始,为广泛提倡的参与式治理方法铺平道路。

相似文献

2
Ethically sustainable governance in the biobanking of eggs and embryos for research.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015 Dec;33(4):277-94. doi: 10.1007/s40592-015-0047-6.
3
Responsible use of organoids in precision medicine: the need for active participant involvement.
Development. 2020 Apr 6;147(7):dev177972. doi: 10.1242/dev.177972.
9
Why governance? A challenge to good governance of biobanks.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015 Dec;33(4):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s40592-016-0055-1.
10
Mini-gut feelings: perspectives of people with cystic fibrosis on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking.
Per Med. 2021 May;18(3):241-254. doi: 10.2217/pme-2020-0161. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic governance: A new era for consent for stem cell research.
Stem Cell Reports. 2024 Sep 10;19(9):1233-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
2
Genetic tests as the strongest motivator of cooperation between participants and biobanks-Findings from cross-sectional study.
Front Genet. 2024 May 17;15:1321690. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1321690. eCollection 2024.
3
Remuneration of donors for cell and gene therapies: an update on the principles and perspective of the World Marrow Donor Association.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 May;59(5):580-586. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02246-x. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
A leap of faith: building the trust in human biobanks.
Front Genet. 2023 Oct 19;14:1261623. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1261623. eCollection 2023.
5
Slide-to-Slide Tissue Transfer and Array Assembly From Limited Samples for Comprehensive Molecular Profiling.
Lab Invest. 2023 May;103(5):100062. doi: 10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100062. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
6
Public awareness and attitudes toward biobank and sample donation: A regional Chinese survey.
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;10:1025775. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1025775. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Mini-gut feelings: perspectives of people with cystic fibrosis on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking.
Per Med. 2021 May;18(3):241-254. doi: 10.2217/pme-2020-0161. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
2
Breeding brains? Patients' and laymen's perspectives on cerebral organoids.
Regen Med. 2020 Dec;15(12):2351-2360. doi: 10.2217/rme-2020-0108. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
4
Incorporating Biobank Consent into a Healthcare Setting: Challenges for Patient Understanding.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Apr-Jun;12(2):113-122. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1851313. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
6
Responsible use of organoids in precision medicine: the need for active participant involvement.
Development. 2020 Apr 6;147(7):dev177972. doi: 10.1242/dev.177972.
7
Authority and the Future of Consent in Population-Level Biomedical Research.
Public Health Ethics. 2019 Oct 30;12(3):225-236. doi: 10.1093/phe/phz015. eCollection 2019 Nov.
8
A rare disease patient/caregiver perspective on fair pricing and access to gene-based therapies.
Gene Ther. 2019 Nov;27(10-11):474-481. doi: 10.1038/s41434-019-0110-7. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
9
Broad consent for biobanks is best - provided it is also deep.
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0414-6.
10
The clinical application of gene editing: ethical and social issues.
Per Med. 2019 Jul;16(4):337-350. doi: 10.2217/pme-2018-0155. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验