Richardson R M, Halperin M L
Am J Kidney Dis. 1987 Aug;10(2):140-3. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(87)80047-1.
The purpose of this case report is to illustrate that the urine pH may be a misleading index in the assessment of the normal renal response to metabolic acidosis. On presentation, the patient had a normal anion-gap type of metabolic acidosis; the cause of the acidosis was gastrointestinal bicarbonate loss. Since the urine pH was 6.0 when the patient was acidemic, distal renal tubular acidosis was also suspected. However, since the kidneys generated more than 190 mmol of bicarbonate per day (urine ammonium was 190 mmol/d), reduced renal acid excretion was not the cause of the acidosis. Therefore, the urine pH of 6.0 provided a false clue with respect to a renal cause for the acidosis in this setting; in contrast, the urine anion gap provides more reliable information concerning bicarbonate generation by the kidney.
本病例报告的目的是说明,在评估肾脏对代谢性酸中毒的正常反应时,尿液pH值可能是一个误导性指标。就诊时,患者为正常阴离子间隙型代谢性酸中毒;酸中毒的原因是胃肠道碳酸氢盐丢失。由于患者处于酸血症时尿液pH值为6.0,因此也怀疑存在远端肾小管酸中毒。然而,由于肾脏每天生成超过190 mmol的碳酸氢盐(尿铵为190 mmol/d),肾脏酸排泄减少并非酸中毒的原因。因此,在这种情况下,尿液pH值为6.0提供了关于酸中毒肾脏病因的错误线索;相比之下,尿阴离子间隙提供了关于肾脏碳酸氢盐生成的更可靠信息。