• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会群体影响的两步模型的证据。

Evidence for a two-step model of social group influence.

作者信息

Cracco Emiel, Bernardet Ulysses, Sevenhant Robbe, Vandenhouwe Nette, Copman Fran, Durnez Wouter, Bombeke Klaas, Brass Marcel

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

iScience. 2022 Aug 6;25(9):104891. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104891. eCollection 2022 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104891
PMID:36051185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9424596/
Abstract

Social group influence plays an important role in societally relevant phenomena such as rioting and mass panic. One way through which groups influence individuals is by directing their gaze. Evidence that gaze following increases with group size has typically been explained in terms of strategic processes. Here, we tested the role of reflexive processes. In an ecologically valid virtual reality task, we found that participants were more likely to follow the group's gaze when more people looked, even though they knew the group provided no relevant information. Interestingly, participants also sometimes changed their mind after starting to follow the gaze of the group, indicating that automatic imitation can be overruled by strategic processes. This suggests that social group influence is best explained by a two-step model in which bottom-up imitative processes first elicit a reflexive tendency to imitate, before top-down strategic processes determine whether to execute or inhibit this reflex.

摘要

社会群体影响在诸如暴乱和大规模恐慌等与社会相关的现象中起着重要作用。群体影响个体的一种方式是引导他们的目光。注视跟随随着群体规模的增加而增加,这一证据通常是从战略过程的角度来解释的。在这里,我们测试了反射过程的作用。在一个生态有效的虚拟现实任务中,我们发现当更多的人看向某个方向时,参与者更有可能跟随群体的目光,即使他们知道该群体没有提供相关信息。有趣的是,参与者有时在开始跟随群体的目光后也会改变主意,这表明自动模仿可能会被战略过程推翻。这表明社会群体影响最好用一个两步模型来解释,在这个模型中,自下而上的模仿过程首先引发一种反射性的模仿倾向,然后自上而下的战略过程决定是否执行或抑制这种反射。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38bd/9424596/135f5b3dab4e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38bd/9424596/669d517f309b/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38bd/9424596/ae7c5bd42998/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38bd/9424596/135f5b3dab4e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38bd/9424596/669d517f309b/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38bd/9424596/ae7c5bd42998/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38bd/9424596/135f5b3dab4e/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence for a two-step model of social group influence.社会群体影响的两步模型的证据。
iScience. 2022 Aug 6;25(9):104891. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104891. eCollection 2022 Sep 16.
2
Conditional effects of gaze on automatic imitation: the role of autistic traits.注视对视化模仿的条件影响:自闭症特质的作用。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 23;10(1):15512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72513-6.
3
The control of automatic imitation based on bottom-up and top-down cues to animacy: insights from brain and behavior.基于自下而上和自上而下的生命感知线索对自动模仿的控制:来自大脑和行为的见解
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;26(11):2503-13. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00651. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
4
Pre-exposure to Ambiguous Faces Modulates Top-Down Control of Attentional Orienting to Counterpredictive Gaze Cues.预先暴露于模糊面孔会调节自上而下对注意力定向的控制,以应对反预测性注视线索。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02234. eCollection 2020.
5
Stronger reactivity to social gaze in virtual reality compared to a classical laboratory environment.虚拟现实中的社交注视反应比传统实验室环境更强。
Br J Psychol. 2021 Feb;112(1):301-314. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12453. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
6
Automatic imitation in a strategic context: players of rock-paper-scissors imitate opponents' gestures.在策略情境中自动模仿:石头剪刀布游戏玩家会模仿对手的手势。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 22;279(1729):780-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1024. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
7
Social group membership does not modulate automatic imitation in a contrastive multi-agent paradigm.社会群体成员身份不会调节对比多主体范式中的自动模仿。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Apr;74(4):746-759. doi: 10.1177/1747021820986528. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
8
The role of sensorimotor processes in social group contagion.感觉运动过程在社会群体传染中的作用。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jun;103:23-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
9
Investigating social gaze as an action-perception online performance.将社会凝视作为一种在线动作感知表现进行研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 20;6:94. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00094. eCollection 2012.
10
To follow or not to follow your gaze: The interplay between strategic control and the eye contact effect on gaze-induced attention orienting.跟随还是不跟随你的目光:策略控制与眼神接触对视定向效应的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jan;151(1):121-136. doi: 10.1037/xge0001074. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Search advantages for facing social groups reflect optimal interactive group sizes.面对社会群体时的搜索优势反映了最佳互动群体规模。
iScience. 2024 Oct 5;27(11):111105. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111105. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
2
Behavioural Synchronisation between Dogs and Humans: Unveiling Interspecific Motor Resonance?狗与人类之间的行为同步:揭示种间运动共鸣?
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 7;14(4):548. doi: 10.3390/ani14040548.
3
The evolution and social cost of herding mentality promote cooperation.羊群心理的演变及其社会成本促进了合作。

本文引用的文献

1
Collective rule-breaking.集体违规行为。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Dec;25(12):1082-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
2
Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R.在(广义)线性混合模型中估计功效:在 R 中的开放介绍和教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2528-2543. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01546-0. Epub 2021 May 5.
3
Standing out from the crowd: Both cue numerosity and social information affect attention in multi-agent contexts.脱颖而出:线索数量和社会信息在多主体情境中均影响注意。
iScience. 2023 Sep 15;26(10):107927. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107927. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Oct;74(10):1737-1746. doi: 10.1177/17470218211013028. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
4
Wise or mad crowds? The cognitive mechanisms underlying information cascades.明智还是疯狂的群体?信息级联背后的认知机制。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 15;6(29):eabb0266. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb0266. eCollection 2020 Jul.
5
Gaze deflection reveals how gaze cueing is tuned to extract the mind behind the eyes.目光转移揭示了目光提示如何调整以提取眼睛背后的思维。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19825-19829. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010841117. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
6
Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model.自动模仿多个代理:一种计算模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2019 Sep;113:101224. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101224. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
Implicit model of other people's visual attention as an invisible, force-carrying beam projecting from the eyes.将他人视觉注意视为一种不可见的、具有力的光束,从眼睛中投射出来的内隐模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 2;116(1):328-333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816581115. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Representing Multiple Observed Actions in the Motor System.在运动系统中表示多个观察到的动作。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jul 22;29(8):3631-3641. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy237.
9
Synchronization: The Key to Effective Communication in Animal Collectives.同步:动物群体中有效沟通的关键。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Oct;22(10):844-846. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.001.
10
Drawing power of virtual crowds.虚拟人群的号召力。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Aug;15(145). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0335.