Abubshait Abdulaziz, Momen Ali, Wiese Eva
Robotics Domain, Italian Institute of Technology, Genoa, Italy.
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02234. eCollection 2020.
Understanding and reacting to others' nonverbal social signals, such as changes in gaze direction (i.e., gaze cue), are essential for social interactions, as it is important for processes such as joint attention and mentalizing. Although attentional orienting in response to gaze cues has a strong reflexive component, accumulating evidence shows that it can be top-down controlled by context information regarding the signals' social relevance. For example, when a gazer is believed to be an entity "with a mind" (i.e., mind perception), people exert more top-down control on attention orienting. Although increasing an agent's physical human-likeness can enhance mind perception, it could have negative consequences on top-down control of social attention when a gazer's physical appearance is categorically ambiguous (i.e., difficult to categorize as human or nonhuman), as resolving this ambiguity would require using cognitive resources that otherwise could be used to top-down control attention orienting. To examine this question, we used mouse-tracking to explore if categorically ambiguous agents are associated with increased processing costs (Experiment 1), whether categorically ambiguous stimuli negatively impact top-down control of social attention (Experiment 2), and if resolving the conflict related to the agent's categorical ambiguity (using exposure) would restore top-down control to orient attention (Experiment 3). The findings suggest that categorically ambiguous stimuli are associated with cognitive conflict, which negatively impact the ability to exert top-down control on attentional orienting in a counterpredicitive gaze-cueing paradigm; this negative impact, however, is attenuated when being pre-exposed to the stimuli prior to the gaze-cueing task. Taken together, these findings suggest that manipulating physical human-likeness is a powerful way to affect mind perception in human-robot interaction (HRI) but has a diminishing returns effect on social attention when it is categorically ambiguous due to drainage of cognitive resources and impairment of top-down control.
理解他人的非语言社交信号并做出反应,比如注视方向的变化(即注视线索),对于社交互动至关重要,因为这对于诸如共同注意和心理理论等过程很重要。尽管对注视线索的注意力定向有很强的反射成分,但越来越多的证据表明,它可以受到关于信号社交相关性的背景信息的自上而下的控制。例如,当注视者被认为是一个“有思维”的实体(即心理理论)时,人们会对注意力定向施加更多的自上而下的控制。虽然增加一个主体的身体类人性可以增强心理理论,但当注视者的外貌在类别上模棱两可(即难以归类为人或非人)时,这可能会对社交注意力的自上而下控制产生负面影响,因为解决这种模棱两可需要使用认知资源,而这些资源原本可用于自上而下地控制注意力定向。为了研究这个问题,我们使用鼠标追踪来探究类别上模棱两可的主体是否与处理成本增加相关(实验1),类别上模棱两可的刺激是否会对社交注意力的自上而下控制产生负面影响(实验2),以及解决与主体类别模棱两可相关的冲突(使用暴露)是否会恢复自上而下的控制以引导注意力(实验3)。研究结果表明,类别上模棱两可的刺激与认知冲突相关,这在反预测注视线索范式中对注意力定向施加自上而下控制的能力产生负面影响;然而,当在注视线索任务之前预先暴露于这些刺激时,这种负面影响会减弱。综上所述,这些发现表明,在人机交互(HRI)中操纵身体类人性是影响心理理论的一种有效方式,但当它由于认知资源的消耗和自上而下控制的受损而在类别上模棱两可时,对社交注意力的影响会逐渐减弱。