• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

羊群心理的演变及其社会成本促进了合作。

The evolution and social cost of herding mentality promote cooperation.

作者信息

Chica Manuel, Rand William, Santos Francisco C

机构信息

Andalusian Research Institute DaSCI "Data Science and Computational Intelligence", University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.

School of Electrical Engineering and Computing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

出版信息

iScience. 2023 Sep 15;26(10):107927. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107927. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107927
PMID:37790280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10543166/
Abstract

Herding behavior has a social cost for individuals not following the herd, influencing human decision-making. This work proposes including a social cost derived from herding mentality into the payoffs of pairwise game interactions. We introduce a co-evolutionary asymmetric model with four individual strategies (cooperation vs. defection and herding vs. non-herding) to understand the co-emergence of herding behavior and cooperation. Computational experiments show how including herding costs promotes cooperation by increasing the parameter space under which cooperation persists. Results demonstrate a synergistic relationship between the emergence of cooperation and herding mentality: the highest cooperation is achieved when the herding mentality also achieves its highest level. Finally, we study different herding social costs and its relationship to cooperation and herding evolution. This study points to new social mechanisms, related to conformity-driven imitation behavior, that help to understand how and why cooperation prevails in human groups.

摘要

羊群行为会给不随大流的个体带来社会成本,影响人类决策。这项工作建议将源自羊群心理的社会成本纳入两两博弈互动的收益中。我们引入了一个具有四种个体策略(合作与背叛以及从众与不从众)的共同进化不对称模型,以理解羊群行为和合作的共同出现。计算实验表明,纳入羊群成本如何通过增加合作持续存在的参数空间来促进合作。结果证明了合作的出现与羊群心理之间的协同关系:当羊群心理也达到最高水平时,合作程度最高。最后,我们研究了不同的羊群社会成本及其与合作和羊群进化的关系。这项研究指出了与从众驱动的模仿行为相关的新社会机制,有助于理解合作在人类群体中如何以及为何盛行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/17c56f12aa3b/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/563157313acb/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/6dcf2f373a96/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/48cd14d89430/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/76bd8da3c48f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/af18e47f5d18/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/0a576d4c1248/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/17c56f12aa3b/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/563157313acb/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/6dcf2f373a96/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/48cd14d89430/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/76bd8da3c48f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/af18e47f5d18/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/0a576d4c1248/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47d/10543166/17c56f12aa3b/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
The evolution and social cost of herding mentality promote cooperation.羊群心理的演变及其社会成本促进了合作。
iScience. 2023 Sep 15;26(10):107927. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107927. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.
2
Randomized matrix games in a finite population: Effect of stochastic fluctuations in the payoffs on the evolution of cooperation.有限群体中的随机矩阵博弈:收益中的随机波动对合作进化的影响。
Theor Popul Biol. 2020 Aug;134:77-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 22.
3
Conformity enhances network reciprocity in evolutionary social dilemmas.在进化社会困境中,从众行为增强了网络互惠性。
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Feb 6;12(103). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.1299.
4
Average abundancy of cooperation in multi-player games with random payoffs.具有随机收益的多人游戏中的合作平均丰度。
J Math Biol. 2022 Sep 12;85(3):27. doi: 10.1007/s00285-022-01789-1.
5
Onymity promotes cooperation in social dilemma experiments.匿名促进社会困境实验中的合作。
Sci Adv. 2017 Mar 29;3(3):e1601444. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601444. eCollection 2017 Mar.
6
Stags, Hawks, and Doves: Social Evolution Theory and Individual Variation in Cooperation.雄鹿、鹰派与鸽派:社会进化理论与合作中的个体差异
Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Sep 1;57(3):566-579. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx071.
7
Coevolution of public goods game and networks based on survival of the fittest.基于适者生存的公共物品博弈与网络的共同进化。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 25;13(9):e0204616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204616. eCollection 2018.
8
Evolution of cooperation in stochastic games.随机博弈中的合作演变。
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7713):246-249. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0277-x. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
9
Conformity effect on the evolution of cooperation in signed networks.签名网络中合作进化的一致性效应。
Chaos. 2023 Feb;33(2):023114. doi: 10.1063/5.0101350.
10
The effect of sanctions on the evolution of cooperation in linear division of labor.制裁对线性分工中合作演变的影响。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Jan 21;437:79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Success-driven opinion formation determines social tensions.成功驱动的舆论形成决定了社会紧张局势。
iScience. 2024 Feb 16;27(3):109254. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109254. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
EGTtools: Evolutionary game dynamics in Python.EGTtools:用Python实现的进化博弈动力学
iScience. 2023 Mar 17;26(4):106419. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106419. eCollection 2023 Apr 21.
2
Evidence for a two-step model of social group influence.社会群体影响的两步模型的证据。
iScience. 2022 Aug 6;25(9):104891. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104891. eCollection 2022 Sep 16.
3
Evolutionary multigame with conformists and profiteers based on dynamic complex networks.基于动态复杂网络的从众者和机会主义者进化多游戏。
Chaos. 2022 Feb;32(2):023117. doi: 10.1063/5.0081954.
4
Cooperation dynamics under pandemic risks and heterogeneous economic interdependence.疫情风险与异质经济相互依存下的合作动态
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2022 Feb;155:111655. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111655. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
5
Combination of institutional incentives for cooperative governance of risky commons.针对风险公共资源合作治理的制度激励措施组合。
iScience. 2021 Jul 12;24(8):102844. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102844. eCollection 2021 Aug 20.
6
Emotion expressions shape human social norms and reputations.情感表达塑造人类社会规范和声誉。
iScience. 2021 Feb 4;24(3):102141. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102141. eCollection 2021 Mar 19.
7
How COVID-19 Triggers Our Herding Behavior? Risk Perception, State Anxiety, and Trust.新冠如何引发我们的从众行为?风险感知、状态焦虑和信任。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 15;9:587439. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.587439. eCollection 2021.
8
Timing Uncertainty in Collective Risk Dilemmas Encourages Group Reciprocation and Polarization.集体风险困境中的时间不确定性会促使群体互惠与两极分化。
iScience. 2020 Oct 31;23(12):101752. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101752. eCollection 2020 Dec 18.
9
Evolutionary game theory using agent-based methods.基于主体的进化博弈论方法。
Phys Life Rev. 2016 Dec;19:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Leaders should not be conformists in evolutionary social dilemmas.在进化社会困境中,领导者不应随波逐流。
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 23;6:23633. doi: 10.1038/srep23633.