Xiang Xiaoling, Cho Joonyoung, Sun Yihang, Wang Xiafei
School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 16;13:935254. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935254. eCollection 2022.
This study examined the association between childhood adversity and cognitive impairment in later life and explored the potential moderation effect of gender and race.
The study sample included 15,133 participants of the Health and Retirement Study (1998-2016 surveys) who had complete data on key study measures and were more than 50. The outcome variable is a dichotomous indicator of cognitive impairment as assessed by the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status for self-respondents and the 16-item Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly for proxies. A total of six childhood adversity indicators included grade retention, parental substance abuse, physical abuse, trouble with the police, moving due to financial hardship, and receipt of help due to financial hardship in early life. The estimation of the association between childhood adversity and cognitive impairment involved Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Grade retention had the largest effect on incident cognitive impairment (HR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.23-1.38, < 0.001), followed by physical abuse by a parent (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.00-1.20, = 0.001). The impact of grade retention was more detrimental to women than men (interaction term HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80-1.00, = 0.048, female as the reference). Parental substance abuse was associated with a lower risk of incident cognitive impairment for most racial groups (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.83-0.95, = 0.001), but this association was reversed in "non-Hispanic other" race, consisting mainly of Asians (HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.05-2.26, = 0.025).
Some aspects of childhood adversity continue to harm cognitive functioning in later life, while some events may have the opposite effect, with evidence of heterogeneity across gender and race.
本研究探讨童年逆境与晚年认知障碍之间的关联,并探究性别和种族的潜在调节作用。
研究样本包括健康与退休研究(1998 - 2016年调查)中的15133名参与者,他们在关键研究指标上有完整数据且年龄超过50岁。结果变量是一个二分指标,用于衡量认知障碍,自我受访者通过认知状态电话访谈进行评估,代理受访者则通过16项老年人认知衰退知情者问卷进行评估。童年逆境指标共有六项,包括留级、父母药物滥用、身体虐待、与警方有麻烦、因经济困难搬家以及早年因经济困难接受帮助。童年逆境与认知障碍之间关联的估计采用Cox比例风险回归。结果:留级对新发认知障碍的影响最大(风险比[HR]=1.3,95%置信区间[CI]=1.23 - 1.38,P<0.001),其次是父母的身体虐待(HR = 1.10,95% CI = 1.00 - 1.20,P = 0.001)。留级对女性的危害比对男性更大(交互项HR = 0.89,95% CI = 0.80 - 1.00,P = 0.048,以女性为参照)。对于大多数种族群体,父母药物滥用与新发认知障碍风险较低相关(HR = 0.89,95% CI = 0.83 - 0.95,P = 0.001),但在主要由亚洲人组成的“非西班牙裔其他”种族中,这种关联则相反(HR = 1.54,95% CI = 1.05 - 2.26,P = 0.025)。
童年逆境的某些方面在晚年继续损害认知功能,而某些事件可能产生相反的效果,且存在性别和种族的异质性证据。