Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍患者在新冠疫情期间的信念形成过程:一项探索性研究。

Believing processes during the COVID-19 pandemic in individuals with bipolar disorder: An exploratory study.

作者信息

Tietz Sophie, Wagner-Skacel Jolana, Angel Hans-Ferdinand, Ratzenhofer Michaela, Fellendorf Frederike T, Fleischmann Eva, Körner Christof, Reininghaus Eva Z, Seitz Rüdiger J, Dalkner Nina

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz 8010, Austria.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria.

出版信息

World J Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 19;12(7):929-943. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i7.929.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Believing or "credition" refers to psychological processes that integrate the cognitions and emotions that influence our behavior. In the credition model by Angel and Seitz, four parameters are postulated: proposition, certainty, emotion and mightiness. It is assumed that believing processes are influenced by both the individual as well as socio-cultural factors and external circumstances. External or environmental circumstances can include threatening situations such as the ongoing pandemic. It has been hypothesized that believing processes related to the pandemic differ between individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy controls (HC).

AIM

To investigate credition in individuals with BD during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

Psychiatrically stable individuals with BD ( = 52) and age- and sex matched HC ( = 52) participated in an online survey during the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey took place between April 9 and June 4, 2020, in Austria. Participants completed the Brief Symptom Inventory-18, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, the Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and a dedicated Believing Questionnaire assessing four parameters of credition (proposition, certainty, emotion and mightiness). The MAXQDA software was used to analyze the qualitative data. Statistical analyses included analyses of variance, a multivariate analysis of variance and a multivariate analysis of co-variance.

RESULTS

Individuals with BD reported significantly more negative propositions [ (1,102) = 8.89, = 0.004, η = 0.08] and negative emotions [Welch´s (1,82.46) = 18.23, < 0.001, η = 0.18], while HC showed significantly more positive propositions [ (1,102) = 7.78, = 0.006, η = 0.07] and emotions [ (1,102) = 14.31, < 0.001, η = 0.12]. In addition, individuals with BD showed a higher incongruence between their propositions and their emotions [ (1,102) = 9.42, = 0.003, η = 0.08] and showed strong correlations between the parameters of the Believing Questionnaire and their psychiatric symptoms ( = 0.51-0.77, all < 0.001). Positive as well as negative emotions and propositions were associated with scores measuring symptoms of depression, anxiety and sleep quality.

CONCLUSION

Believing parameters were associated with psychiatric symptoms in BD during the pandemic. Findings broaden knowledge about the susceptibility of believing processes for ambient challenges in individuals with BD.

摘要

背景

信念或“credition”指的是整合影响我们行为的认知和情感的心理过程。在安吉尔和塞茨的credition模型中,假定了四个参数:命题、确定性、情感和强大程度。据推测,信念过程受到个体以及社会文化因素和外部环境的影响。外部或环境情况可能包括诸如当前大流行这样的威胁性情况。据推测,双相情感障碍(BD)患者和健康对照者(HC)在与大流行相关的信念过程上存在差异。

目的

调查2019年冠状病毒病(COVID - 19)大流行期间BD患者的credition。

方法

在COVID - 19大流行的首次封锁期间,52名精神状态稳定的BD患者和年龄及性别匹配的52名HC参与了一项在线调查。该调查于2020年4月9日至6月4日在奥地利进行。参与者完成了简明症状量表 - 18、贝克抑郁量表 - II、奥特曼躁狂自评量表、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数以及一份专门评估credition四个参数(命题、确定性、情感和强大程度)的信念问卷。使用MAXQDA软件分析定性数据。统计分析包括方差分析、多变量方差分析和多变量协方差分析。

结果

BD患者报告的负面命题显著更多[F(1,102)=8.89,p = 0.004,η² = 0.08],负面情绪也显著更多[韦尔奇F(1,82.46)=18.23,p < 0.001,η² = 0.18],而HC显示出显著更多的正面命题[F(1,102)=7.78,p = 0.006,η² = 0.07]和正面情绪[F(1,102)=14.31,p < 0.001,η² = 0.12]。此外,BD患者在其命题和情绪之间表现出更高的不一致性[F(1,102)=9.42,p = 0.003,η² = 0.08],并且信念问卷的参数与其精神症状之间显示出强烈的相关性(r = 0.51 - 0.77,均p < 0.001)。正面和负面情绪及命题均与测量抑郁、焦虑和睡眠质量症状的得分相关。

结论

在大流行期间,BD患者的信念参数与精神症状相关。研究结果拓宽了关于BD患者信念过程对环境挑战易感性的认识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8309/9331453/d22a53424b22/WJP-12-929-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验