College of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Nanobody Research, Guangxi Nanobody Engineering Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Laboratory Animal Center, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China.
The Department of Stomatology, The Central Hospital Afilliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250013, China.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 22;2022:5042097. doi: 10.1155/2022/5042097. eCollection 2022.
This study used a retrospective method to explore the relevant factors affecting the prognosis of periodontal-endodontic combined lesions.
According to the changes of subjective feelings and clinical indicators of affected teeth, selected patients were divided into an effective group and an ineffective group. The natural conditions (age, gender, and smoking status) of the patients and various clinical indicators at the initial and follow-up visits were collected, including the periodontal clinical indicators of the whole mouth and the clinical indicators of the affected teeth. The full-mouth periodontal clinical indicators include periodontal probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), sulcus bleeding index (SBI), and simplified oral hygiene index (OHI.S); clinical indicators of affected teeth include PD, CAL, SBI, mobility (TM), clinical crown-to-root ratio (CR), periapical index (PAI), and number of root canals.
There were 74 cases of endodontic combined treatment, with a total of 86 teeth. There was no significant difference in age and gender ratio between the effective group and the ineffective group, and the proportion of smoking patients in the ineffective group was significantly higher than that in the effective group ( < 0.05). At the initial diagnosis, there was no significant difference in the clinical indicators of the whole mouth between the effective group and the ineffective group. After a combined endodontic treatment, the clinical indicators of the two groups were significantly improved ( < 0.01). There was no significant difference in other periodontal clinical indicators between the two groups.
The prognosis of nonsurgical treatment of periodontal and periodontal combined lesions is mainly correlated to the patient's oral hygiene maintenance, as well as the loss of attachment, the degree of loosening, the clinical crown-to-root ratio, the periapical index, and the number of root canals.
本研究采用回顾性方法探讨影响牙周-牙髓联合病变预后的相关因素。
根据患牙主观感受及临床指标的变化,将入选患者分为有效组和无效组。分别收集患者的自然状况(年龄、性别、吸烟状况)和初诊及复诊时的各项临床指标,包括全口牙周临床指标和患牙临床指标。全口牙周临床指标包括牙周探诊深度(PD)、临床附着丧失(CAL)、龈沟出血指数(SBI)和简化口腔卫生指数(OHI.S);患牙临床指标包括 PD、CAL、SBI、松动度(TM)、临床冠根比(CR)、根尖指数(PAI)和根管数目。
共纳入 74 例牙髓联合治疗病例,共 86 颗患牙。有效组和无效组患者年龄、性别比差异无统计学意义,无效组吸烟患者比例明显高于有效组( < 0.05)。初诊时两组全口牙周临床指标差异无统计学意义,联合根管治疗后两组各项临床指标均明显改善( < 0.01),两组间其他牙周临床指标差异无统计学意义。
牙周-牙髓联合病变非手术治疗的预后主要与患者的口腔卫生维护、附着丧失程度、松动度、临床冠根比、根尖指数和根管数目有关。