Ningsih Endang Sri Purwanti, Yusuf Ah, Firdaus Syamsul, Ilmi Bahrul, Fitryasari Rizki, Setyowati Anggi
Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Nursing Program, Poltekkes Kemenkes Banjarmasin, Indonesia.
J Public Health Res. 2022 Aug 22;11(3):22799036221106605. doi: 10.1177/22799036221106605. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Religious health fatalism belief that health outcome is only determined by God without seeking treatment. Tools are needed to measure fatalism among patients with chronic disease, especially diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients. The aim of this study was to conduct psychometric test of religious health fatalism questionnaire (RHFQ) including translation, validation, reliability, and cut-off point among DFU out-patients.
This study employed cross sectional design, using self-report questionnaire. Data were collected from diabetes clinic in five hospitals, Indonesia. The inclusion criteria were patients who had history of DFU more than 2 years. Total sample in this study was 184 patients. This study was conducted from April to June 2021. Permission to use the RHFQ was permitted by the original author. We conducted translation and adaptation questionnaire to Bahasa. We employed reliability test with internal consistency, construct validity, and convergent validity. Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Cut-off point RHS was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC). ROC was evaluated using correlation score between total score RHFQ and CDRISC-25 Indonesia version. Previous study mentioned that resilience is a predictor of religious. The Cronbach's alpha for RHFQ Indonesia version was adequate.
EFA showed adequate with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.72 and the Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant. According to ROC curve analysis, the cut-off point at a score 67.5 indicated the best sensitivity and specificity.
RHFQ Indonesia version had reliability and validity for screening religious health fatalism among DFU outpatients.
宗教健康宿命论认为健康结果仅由上帝决定,无需寻求治疗。需要工具来测量慢性病患者,尤其是糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者中的宿命论。本研究的目的是对宗教健康宿命论问卷(RHFQ)进行心理测量测试,包括在DFU门诊患者中进行翻译、验证、可靠性和临界点分析。
本研究采用横断面设计,使用自填式问卷。数据收集于印度尼西亚五家医院的糖尿病诊所。纳入标准为有超过2年DFU病史的患者。本研究的总样本为184名患者。本研究于2021年4月至6月进行。使用RHFQ的许可已获原作者批准。我们对问卷进行了翻译并改编为印尼语。我们采用了内部一致性、结构效度和收敛效度的可靠性测试。使用探索性因素分析(EFA)评估结构效度。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析RHS的临界点。使用RHFQ总分与印尼版CDRISC-25之间的相关评分评估ROC。先前的研究提到复原力是宗教信仰的一个预测因素。印尼版RHFQ的克朗巴哈系数足够。
EFA显示结果良好,Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO)值为0.72,巴特利特球形度检验具有显著性。根据ROC曲线分析,得分67.5时的临界点显示出最佳的敏感性和特异性。
印尼版RHFQ在筛查DFU门诊患者的宗教健康宿命论方面具有可靠性和有效性。