Li Jin-Luan, Li Hui, Wu Qian, Zhou Han, Li Yi, Li Yong-Heng, Li Jiancheng
Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institution, Beijing, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 16;12:777934. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.777934. eCollection 2022.
As the long-term prognosis of esophageal cancer (EC) is improving, concerns of a second primary malignancy (SPM) have increased. However, research on lung cancer as the SPM after EC is limited. Therefore, we aimed to explore the prognostic factors and clinical treatment decisions of patients with second primary lung cancer following esophageal cancer (SPLC-EC).
We identified the data of 715 patients with SPLC-EC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 1975 to 2016. We established a nomogram through Cox regression modelling to predict the prognosis of patients with SPLC-EC. We determined the association between factors and cancer-specific mortality using the Fine-Gray competing risk model. Then, we performed survival analysis to evaluate the benefits of different treatment methods for overall survival (OS).
The multivariate analysis indicated that sex, insurance recode, age, surgery and chemotherapy 0for first primary malignancy (FPM), primary site, stage, and surgery for SPM were independent prognostic factors for OS. Using concordance indices for OS, the nomogram of our cohort showed a higher value than the SEER historic-stage nomogram (0.8805 versus 0.7370). The Fine-Gray competing risk model indicated that surgery for FPM and SPM was the independent prognostic factor for EC-specific mortality (P=0.016, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.532) and LC-specific mortality (p=0.016, HR=0.457), respectively (p<0.001). Compared to the patient group having distant metastasis, patients with localized and regional metastasis benefitted from undergoing surgery for SPM (P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively). For patients without surgery for SPM, radiotherapy (P<0.001) and chemotherapy (P<0.001) could improve OS.
Surgery remains the mainstay for managing SPLC-EC, especially for localized and regional tumors. However, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are recommended for patients who cannot undergo surgery. These findings can have implications in the treatment decision-making for patients with SPLC-EC.
随着食管癌(EC)长期预后的改善,对第二原发性恶性肿瘤(SPM)的关注有所增加。然而,关于肺癌作为EC后SPM的研究有限。因此,我们旨在探讨食管癌后第二原发性肺癌(SPLC-EC)患者的预后因素及临床治疗决策。
我们从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中确定了1975年至2016年期间715例SPLC-EC患者的数据。我们通过Cox回归建模建立了一个列线图,以预测SPLC-EC患者的预后。我们使用Fine-Gray竞争风险模型确定因素与癌症特异性死亡率之间的关联。然后,我们进行生存分析以评估不同治疗方法对总生存期(OS)的益处。
多变量分析表明,性别、保险编码、年龄、首次原发性恶性肿瘤(FPM)的手术和化疗、原发部位、分期以及SPM的手术是OS的独立预后因素。使用OS的一致性指数,我们队列的列线图显示的值高于SEER历史分期列线图(0.8805对0.7370)。Fine-Gray竞争风险模型表明,FPM和SPM的手术分别是EC特异性死亡率(P = 0.016,风险比[HR] = 0.532)和LC特异性死亡率(P = 0.016,HR = 0.457)的独立预后因素(P < 0.001)。与有远处转移的患者组相比,局限性和区域性转移患者从SPM手术中获益(分别为P < 0.001,P < 0.001)。对于未进行SPM手术的患者,放疗(P < 0.001)和化疗(P < 0.001)可改善OS。
手术仍然是治疗SPLC-EC的主要方法,特别是对于局限性和区域性肿瘤。然而,对于无法进行手术的患者,建议进行化疗和放疗。这些发现可能对SPLC-EC患者的治疗决策产生影响。