Gao Chengcheng, Qian Qi, Li Yangsheng, Xing Xiaowei, He Xiao, Lin Min, Ding Zhongxiang
Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Aug 16;10:976565. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.976565. eCollection 2022.
Bone age assessment (BAA) is an essential tool utilized in outpatient pediatric clinics. Three major BAA methods, Greulich-Pyle (GP), Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW3), and China 05 RUS-CHN (RUS-CHN), were applied to comprehensively compare bone age (BA) and chronological age (CA) in a Chinese sample of preschool children. This study was designed to determine the most reliable method.
The BAA sample consisted of 207 females and 183 males aged 3-6 years from the Zhejiang Province in China. The radiographs were estimated according to the GP, TW3, and RUS-CHN methods by two pediatric radiologists. The data was analyzed statistically using boxplots, the Wilcoxon rank test, and Student's -test to explore the difference (D) between BA and CA.
According to the distributions of D, the boxplots showed that the median D of the TW3 method was close to zero for both male and female subjects. The TW3 and RUS-CHN methods overestimated the age of both genders. The TW3 method had the highest correct classification rate for males but a similar rate for females. The GP method did not show any significant difference between the BA and CA when applied to 3-year-old males and 4-year-old females while the TW3 method showed similar results when applied to 6-year-old females. The RUS-CHN method showed the least consistent results among the three methods.
The TW3 method was superior to the GP and RUS-CHN methods but not reliable on its own. It should be noted that a precise age diagnosis for preschool children cannot be easily made if only one of the methods is utilized. Therefore, it is advantageous to combine multiple methods when assessing bone age.
骨龄评估(BAA)是儿科门诊使用的一项重要工具。三种主要的骨龄评估方法,即格-派(GP)法、坦纳-怀特豪斯3(TW3)法和中国05桡尺骨干骺端-中国(RUS-CHN)法,被用于全面比较中国学龄前儿童样本中的骨龄(BA)和实际年龄(CA)。本研究旨在确定最可靠的方法。
骨龄评估样本包括来自中国浙江省的207名3至6岁女性和183名男性。两名儿科放射科医生根据GP、TW3和RUS-CHN方法对X光片进行评估。使用箱线图、威尔科克森秩和检验以及学生t检验对数据进行统计分析,以探究骨龄和实际年龄之间的差异(D)。
根据差异(D)的分布,箱线图显示,TW3法的男性和女性受试者的D中位数均接近零。TW3法和RUS-CHN法均高估了两性的年龄。TW3法对男性的正确分类率最高,但对女性的分类率与之相似。GP法应用于3岁男性和4岁女性时,骨龄和实际年龄之间未显示出任何显著差异,而TW3法应用于6岁女性时显示出相似结果。RUS-CHN法在三种方法中结果一致性最差。
TW3法优于GP法和RUS-CHN法,但自身并不可靠。需要注意的是,如果仅使用其中一种方法,很难对学龄前儿童进行精确的年龄诊断。因此,在评估骨龄时结合多种方法是有益的。