Pinchi Vilma, De Luca Federica, Ricciardi Federico, Focardi Martina, Piredda Valentina, Mazzeo Elena, Norelli Gian-Aristide
Department of Health Sciences, Forensic Sciences Section, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Department of Health Sciences, Forensic Sciences Section, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 May;238:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.02.030. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
Paediatricians, radiologists, anthropologists and medico-legal specialists are often called as experts in order to provide age estimation (AE) for forensic purposes. The literature recommends performing the X-rays of the left hand and wrist (HW-XR) for skeletal age estimation. The method most frequently employed is the Greulich and Pyle (GP) method. In addition, the so-called bone-specific techniques are also applied including the method of Tanner Whitehouse (TW) in the latest versions TW2 and TW3.
To compare skeletal age and chronological age in a large sample of children and adolescents using GP, TW2 and TW3 methods in order to establish which of these is the most reliable for forensic purposes.
The sample consisted of 307 HW-XRs of Italian children or adolescents, 145 females and 162 males aged between 6 and 20 years. The radiographies were scored according to the GP, TW2RUS and TW3RUS methods by one investigator. The results' reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Student t-test were performed to search for significant differences between skeletal and chronological ages.
The distributions of the differences between estimated and chronological age, by means of boxplots, show how median differences for TW3 and GP methods are generally very close to 0. Hypothesis tests' results were obtained, with respect to the sex, both for the entire group of individuals and people grouped by age. Results show no significant differences among estimated and chronological age for TW3 and, to a lesser extent, GP. The TW2 proved to be the worst of the three methods.
Our results support the conclusion that the TW2 method is not reliable for AE for forensic purpose. The GP and TW3 methods have proved to be reliable in males. For females, the best method was found to be TW3. When performing forensic age estimation in subjects around 14 years of age, it could be advisable to use and associate the TW3 and GP methods.
儿科医生、放射科医生、人类学家和法医学专家常被作为专家,以便为法医目的提供年龄估计(AE)。文献推荐通过左手和腕部的X线摄影(HW-XR)进行骨骼年龄估计。最常采用的方法是格鲁利希和派尔(GP)方法。此外,还应用了所谓的特定骨骼技术,包括最新版本TW2和TW3中的坦纳-怀特豪斯(TW)方法。
使用GP、TW2和TW3方法比较大量儿童和青少年样本的骨骼年龄和实际年龄,以确定哪种方法在法医目的方面最可靠。
样本包括307例意大利儿童或青少年的HW-XR,其中145名女性和162名男性,年龄在6至20岁之间。由一名研究人员根据GP、TW2RUS和TW3RUS方法对X线片进行评分。使用组内相关系数评估结果的可靠性。进行威尔科克森符号秩检验和学生t检验,以寻找骨骼年龄和实际年龄之间的显著差异。
通过箱线图展示估计年龄与实际年龄差异的分布情况,结果表明TW3和GP方法的中位数差异的中位数通常非常接近0。针对整个个体组以及按年龄分组的人群,均获得了关于性别的假设检验结果。结果显示,TW3以及在较小程度上的GP,其估计年龄与实际年龄之间无显著差异。TW2被证明是三种方法中最差的。
我们的结果支持以下结论:TW2方法在法医目的的年龄估计中不可靠。GP和TW3方法在男性中已被证明是可靠的。对于女性,发现最佳方法是TW3。在对14岁左右的受试者进行法医年龄估计时,建议同时使用TW3和GP方法并将其结合起来。