Suppr超能文献

预防性胆囊切除术在 ERCP 清除胆总管结石后提供最佳结果:一项荟萃分析。

Prophylactic cholecystectomy offers best outcomes following ERCP clearance of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland.

School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Oct;49(5):2257-2267. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02070-2. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic calculus biliary disease is common with associated morbidity and occasional mortality, further confounded when there is concomitant common bile duct (CBD) stones. Choledocholithiasis and clearance of the duct reduces recurrent cholangitis, but the question is whether after clearance of the CBD if there is a need to perform a cholecystectomy. This meta-analysis evaluated outcomes in patients undergoing ERCP with or without sphincterotomy to determine if cholecystectomy post-ERCP clearance offers optimal outcomes over a wait-and-see approach.

METHODS

A Prospero registered meta-analysis of the literature using PRISMA guidelines incorporating articles related to ERCP, choledocholithiasis, cholangitis and cholecystectomy was undertaken for papers published between 1st January 1991 and 31st May 2021. Existing research that demonstrates outcomes of ERCP with no cholecystectomy versus ERCP and cholecystectomy was reviewed to determine the related key events, complications and mortality of leaving the gallbladder in situ and removing it. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using Review Manager Version 5.4 and meta-analyses performed using OR using fixed-effect (or random-effect) models, depending on the heterogeneity of studies.

RESULTS

13 studies (n = 2598), published between 2002 and 2019, were included in this meta-analysis, 6 retrospective, 2 propensity score-matched retrospective studies, 3 prospective studies and 2 randomised control trials from a total of 11 countries. There were 1433 in the no cholecystectomy cohort (55.2%) and 1165 in the prophylactic cholecystectomy (44.8%) cohort. Cholecystectomy resulted in a decreased risk of cholecystitis (OR = 0.15; CI 0.07-0.36; p < 0.0001), cholangitis (OR = 0.51; CI 0.26-1.00; p = 0.05) and mortality (OR = 0.38; CI 0.16-0.9; p = 0.03). In addition, prophylactic cholecystectomy resulted in a significant reduction in biliary events, biliary pain and pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing CBD clearance, consideration should be given to performing prophylactic cholecystectomy to optimise outcomes.

摘要

背景

有症状的胆石病很常见,会导致发病和偶尔死亡,当同时存在胆总管(CBD)结石时情况会更加复杂。胆总管结石和胆管清除可减少复发性胆管炎,但问题是 CBD 清除后是否需要进行胆囊切除术。这项荟萃分析评估了接受 ERCP 加或不加括约肌切开术的患者的结局,以确定 CBD 清除后行胆囊切除术是否优于观察等待。

方法

采用 PROSPERO 注册的文献荟萃分析,采用 PRISMA 指南,纳入了 1991 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 31 日期间发表的与 ERCP、胆总管结石、胆管炎和胆囊切除术相关的文章。回顾了现有的研究,这些研究展示了不进行胆囊切除术的 ERCP 与 ERCP 和胆囊切除术的结果,以确定保留胆囊原位和切除胆囊的相关关键事件、并发症和死亡率。使用 Review Manager 版本 5.4 计算比值比(OR),并根据研究的异质性,使用固定效应(或随机效应)模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 13 项研究(n=2598),发表于 2002 年至 2019 年之间,其中 6 项为回顾性研究,2 项为倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究,3 项为前瞻性研究,2 项为随机对照试验,来自 11 个国家。无胆囊切除术组 1433 例(55.2%),预防性胆囊切除术组 1165 例(44.8%)。胆囊切除术可降低胆囊炎(OR=0.15;95%CI 0.07-0.36;p<0.0001)、胆管炎(OR=0.51;95%CI 0.26-1.00;p=0.05)和死亡率(OR=0.38;95%CI 0.16-0.9;p=0.03)的风险。此外,预防性胆囊切除术可显著降低胆道事件、胆道疼痛和胰腺炎的发生。

结论

在 CBD 清除的患者中,应考虑行预防性胆囊切除术以优化结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2148/10520076/f85e973533e9/68_2022_2070_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验